diff --git a/modelling_audit.md b/modelling_audit.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..81c5595d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/modelling_audit.md
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+# Modelling anomaly audit
+
+Scanned **0** properties · flagged **0** anomalies across **0** checks.
diff --git a/scripts/audit/__init__.py b/scripts/audit/__init__.py
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e69de29b
diff --git a/scripts/audit_modelling_anomalies.py b/scripts/audit/anomalies.py
similarity index 77%
rename from scripts/audit_modelling_anomalies.py
rename to scripts/audit/anomalies.py
index 10f6bef1..420d1be9 100644
--- a/scripts/audit_modelling_anomalies.py
+++ b/scripts/audit/anomalies.py
@@ -77,6 +77,10 @@ class PropertyAudit:
     cost_of_works: Optional[float]
     energy_bill_savings: Optional[float]
     energy_consumption_savings: Optional[float]
+    # Recommendation-level rollups for the default plan.
+    solar_sap_points: Optional[float]  # max SAP a single solar_pv measure earns
+    solar_bill_savings: Optional[float]  # the solar_pv measure's £/yr bill saving
+    n_measures: int
 
 
 @dataclass(frozen=True)
@@ -173,6 +177,50 @@ def _effective_lodged_divergence(a: PropertyAudit) -> Optional[str]:
     return f"effective {a.effective_sap:.0f} vs lodged {a.lodged_sap:.0f} (Δ{gap:+.0f}, reason={a.rebaseline_reason})"
 
 
+@check("impossible-sap-over-100", Severity.HIGH)
+def _impossible_sap_over_100(a: PropertyAudit) -> Optional[str]:
+    """A SAP score above 100 is impossible (SAP caps at 100) — a calculator /
+    aggregation bug, or an oversized solar array pushing the score past the cap."""
+    offenders = [
+        f"{label} {value:.1f}"
+        for label, value in (("post", a.post_sap), ("effective", a.effective_sap))
+        if value is not None and value > 100.0
+    ]
+    if not offenders:
+        return None
+    return "SAP > 100: " + ", ".join(offenders)
+
+
+@check("excessive-solar-sap", Severity.MEDIUM)
+def _excessive_solar_sap(a: PropertyAudit) -> Optional[str]:
+    """A single solar PV measure earns an implausibly large slice of SAP (> 25
+    points; cohort avg ≈ 12.5). Usually an oversized array — Google footprint
+    conflation borrowing a neighbour's / the whole building's roof (ADR-0038)."""
+    if a.solar_sap_points is None or a.solar_sap_points <= 25.0:
+        return None
+    return f"solar PV alone earns {a.solar_sap_points:.1f} SAP points (likely oversized array)"
+
+
+@check("unusually-high-post-sap", Severity.LOW)
+def _unusually_high_post_sap(a: PropertyAudit) -> Optional[str]:
+    """Post-works SAP at the very top of the scale (>= 95, near band A) — rare for
+    a retrofit of existing stock; worth confirming it isn't an over-credit."""
+    if a.post_sap is None or a.post_sap < 95.0 or a.post_sap > 100.0:
+        return None
+    return f"post SAP {a.post_sap:.1f} (near band A) — confirm not over-credited"
+
+
+@check("low-solar-bill-savings", Severity.MEDIUM)
+def _low_solar_bill_savings(a: PropertyAudit) -> Optional[str]:
+    """A solar PV measure that barely cuts the bill (< £50/yr, or negative). Solar
+    reliably saves on electricity, so a near-zero / negative figure points at a
+    pricing bug — e.g. self-consumption or SEG export not credited (the Saltmead
+    case: solar, D→C, but only ≈ −£62/yr)."""
+    if a.solar_bill_savings is None or a.solar_bill_savings >= 50.0:
+        return None
+    return f"solar PV bill saving only £{a.solar_bill_savings:.0f}/yr — check self-consumption / SEG export"
+
+
 @check("negative-bill-savings", Severity.LOW)
 def _negative_bill_savings(a: PropertyAudit) -> Optional[str]:
     """The plan INCREASES the annual bill — can be legitimate on a fuel-switch
@@ -205,14 +253,41 @@ _QUERY = text(
 )
 
 
+_ROLLUP_QUERY = text(
+    """
+    SELECT r.property_id,
+           MAX(r.sap_points) FILTER (WHERE r.type = 'solar_pv') AS solar_sap,
+           MAX(r.energy_cost_savings) FILTER (WHERE r.type = 'solar_pv') AS solar_bill,
+           COUNT(*) AS n_measures
+    FROM recommendation r
+    JOIN plan pl ON pl.id = r.plan_id AND pl.is_default = TRUE
+    JOIN property p ON p.id = r.property_id
+    WHERE (:portfolio_id IS NULL OR p.portfolio_id = :portfolio_id)
+      AND (:property_id IS NULL OR p.id = :property_id)
+    GROUP BY r.property_id
+    """
+)
+
+
 def _load(portfolio_id: Optional[int], property_id: Optional[int]) -> list[PropertyAudit]:
     engine = build_engine()
     out: list[PropertyAudit] = []
     with engine.connect() as conn:
+        rollups: dict[int, tuple[Optional[float], Optional[float], int]] = {
+            m["property_id"]: (m["solar_sap"], m["solar_bill"], m["n_measures"])
+            for m in (
+                row._mapping
+                for row in conn.execute(
+                    _ROLLUP_QUERY,
+                    {"portfolio_id": portfolio_id, "property_id": property_id},
+                )
+            )
+        }
         for r in conn.execute(
             _QUERY, {"portfolio_id": portfolio_id, "property_id": property_id}
         ):
             m = r._mapping
+            solar_sap, solar_bill, n_measures = rollups.get(m["id"], (None, None, 0))
             out.append(
                 PropertyAudit(
                     property_id=m["id"],
@@ -230,6 +305,9 @@ def _load(portfolio_id: Optional[int], property_id: Optional[int]) -> list[Prope
                     cost_of_works=m["cost_of_works"],
                     energy_bill_savings=m["energy_bill_savings"],
                     energy_consumption_savings=m["energy_consumption_savings"],
+                    solar_sap_points=solar_sap,
+                    solar_bill_savings=solar_bill,
+                    n_measures=n_measures,
                 )
             )
     return out