diff --git a/backend/documents_parser/extractor.py b/backend/documents_parser/extractor.py
index fe85c8f59..42ad98a56 100644
--- a/backend/documents_parser/extractor.py
+++ b/backend/documents_parser/extractor.py
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ from datatypes.epc.surveys.pashub_rdsap_site_notes import (
     MainBuildingMeasurements,
     MainHeating,
     PasHubRdSapSiteNotes,
+    PvArrayDetail,
     Renewables,
     RoomCountElements,
     RoofSpace,
@@ -435,8 +436,41 @@ class PasHubRdSapSiteNotesExtractor:
             hydro=self._bool_in(r_section, "Is the dwelling connected to Hydro?"),
             pv_connection=pv_connection,
             percent_roof_covered_pv=percent_roof,
+            pv_diverter_present=self._optional_bool_in(
+                r_section, "Is there a PV diverter?"
+            ),
+            pv_arrays=self._pv_arrays_in(r_section),
         )
 
+    def _pv_arrays_in(self, r_section: List[str]) -> Optional[List[PvArrayDetail]]:
+        """The "Photovoltaic array kWp Known? Yes" form lodges a per-system
+        block instead of the percent-roof estimate: "Number of PV systems?"
+        then "PV {n}: kWp value / Photovoltaic Pitch / Orientation /
+        Overshading" per system. Dropped detail silently zeroes the Appendix M
+        PV credit downstream (issue #1590 bug 1)."""
+        systems_raw = self._get_in(r_section, "Number of PV systems?")
+        if systems_raw is None:
+            return None
+        arrays: List[PvArrayDetail] = []
+        for n in range(1, int(systems_raw) + 1):
+            kwp_raw = self._get_in(r_section, f"PV {n}: kWp value:")
+            pitch_raw = self._get_in(r_section, f"PV {n}: Photovoltaic Pitch?")
+            arrays.append(
+                PvArrayDetail(
+                    kwp=float(kwp_raw.split()[0]) if kwp_raw else None,
+                    pitch_degrees=(
+                        int(pitch_raw.split()[0]) if pitch_raw else None
+                    ),
+                    orientation=self._get_in(
+                        r_section, f"PV {n}: Photovoltaic Orientation?"
+                    ),
+                    overshading=self._get_in(
+                        r_section, f"PV {n}: Photovoltaic Overshading:"
+                    ),
+                )
+            )
+        return arrays or None
+
     def extract_room_count_elements(self) -> RoomCountElements:
         rce_section = self._section("Room Count Elements", "Customer Response")
         heated_rooms_raw = self._get_in(rce_section, "Number of heated rooms?")
diff --git a/backend/documents_parser/tests/test_pashub_sap_accuracy.py b/backend/documents_parser/tests/test_pashub_sap_accuracy.py
index 34141c47b..b22c44b31 100644
--- a/backend/documents_parser/tests/test_pashub_sap_accuracy.py
+++ b/backend/documents_parser/tests/test_pashub_sap_accuracy.py
@@ -84,7 +84,10 @@ _MIN_WITHIN_HALF: float = 0.12
 # Ratcheted 2.71 -> 2.64 by #1590 bug 2 (roof "Insulation At: None" -> explicit
 # zero thickness): observed MAE 2.632 — the two ~7-SAP roof over-raters
 # (507665533138 / 507670893756) correcting is exactly 14/205 ≈ 0.07 of MAE.
-_MAX_SAP_MAE: float = 2.64
+# Ratcheted 2.64 -> 2.58 by #1590 bug 1 (surveyed PV arrays now reach the
+# Appendix M input): observed MAE 2.571 — 507639151843's 13.5-SAP zero-PV-credit
+# under-rate closing.
+_MAX_SAP_MAE: float = 2.58
 
 _KNOWN_GAP_REASON = (
     "pashub `from_site_notes` mapper does not int-code a main-heating "