Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
af501fce0e feat(modelling): ventilation-aware selection — price the forced dependency in
The warm-start (and max-gain fallback) now price each forced Measure Dependency
the candidate triggers, not just inject it afterwards: optimise/optimise_min_cost
fold dependencies into each candidate's cost+gain via _augmented_cost_gain, and
optimise_package scores each dependency's true role-1 signal (_with_role1_signals)
instead of the 0.0 placeholder. This stops the min-cost objective (i) ignoring the
~£900 a wall drags in (a wall-free package reaching target can be cheaper) and
(ii) picking a small-gain wall whose mandatory ventilation (down to -5 SAP) makes
it net-negative, which repair cannot un-pick.

Budget is now a hard envelope: the constraint applies to the augmented (measure +
its ventilation) cost, so a wall that fits alone but whose ventilation would bust
the budget is DROPPED rather than forced over budget. This reverses the earlier
'forced regardless of budget' call (which made sense when selection was
ventilation-blind). Safety invariant intact — presence still injected on every
path; we just never recommend a wall we can't afford to ventilate. ADR-0016
amendment updated. 94 modelling+orchestration tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-03 16:16:26 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
5620f49f18 docs(modelling): ADR-0016 amendment — optimiser objective is least-cost-to-target
The original ADR-0016 mis-specified the warm-start objective as maximise-gain-
subject-to-budget (with the target a repair floor); the rebuild faithfully
implemented that wrong objective. The intended behaviour is the legacy
StrategicOptimiser Case 1: minimise cost subject to (true) SAP gain >= target and
cost <= budget, falling back to max-gain-within-budget only when the target is
unreachable. For Increasing EPC this is least-cost-to-target: cheapest package
reaching the band, stops at the target (no overshoot into a higher band), surplus
budget unspent.

Also records: target predicate sap_continuous >= band floor (conservative, no
legacy slack — re-score+repair supersede it); ventilation-aware selection (the
forced dependency, -1 to -5 SAP, is folded into candidate evaluation with a real
negative role-1 signal, not just injected afterwards); presence-vs-awareness
enforcement; warm-start+re-score+repair structure and scalability rationale kept.
Sharpened the CONTEXT.md Optimised Package definition to match.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-03 15:26:02 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
772cdd4f5a docs(modelling): #1157 Plan-persistence design review
Outcome of the /grill-with-docs session scoping #1157.

- CONTEXT.md: add **Plan Measure** (the persisted selected Option +
  role-3 attribution + cost); Recommendation stays the candidate.
  Remove Scenario Phase / Plan Phase / Rolled-over Options — multi-phase
  is deferred. Reshape Scenario + Plan to single-phase; fix relationships,
  dialogue, and the "phase" ambiguity note.
- ADR-0005: rewritten to Deferred (multi-phase was speculative
  prospective-client work; single-phase now; future plan_phase back-fill
  path preserved). Stray phase refs cleaned in ADR-0016 / ADR-0009.
- ADR-0017 (new): Plan persistence — reuse the live plan/recommendation
  tables via SQLModel mirrors + a PlanRepository on the UoW; add
  recommendation.plan_id, retire the plan_recommendations m2m; flat
  post-retrofit on plan; idempotent replace; CO2 in tonnes. Unselected
  alternatives + bills noted as deferred directions.
- docs/migrations/recommendation-plan-id.md: the FE-owned Drizzle change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-03 11:12:54 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
0ba45a09cc docs(modelling): record stage design — CONTEXT terms + ADR-0016
Reframe Recommendation as a target surface (partitions the EpcPropertyData
surface, so selected overlays never collide); add Measure Option,
Simulation Overlay (EpcSimulation), Product, Cost, Contingency, and
Measure Dependency. ADR-0016 fixes the scoring/optimisation approach
(warm-start grouped-knapsack MILP -> deterministic package re-score ->
greedy repair, with a final-package marginal cascade for display
attribution), resolving the open question in ADR-0005 §14.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-02 22:13:51 +00:00