_heat_pump_apm_efficiencies applied the Table N8 in-use factor to the PCDB
water-heating efficiency but omitted the spec's "subject to a minimum
efficiency of 100%" clause (SAP 10.2 Appendix N3.7, PDF p.109). An oversized
heat pump whose PSR-extended water,3 x the 0.60 in-use factor fell below
100% therefore billed water heating at that sub-100% efficiency, over-
counting hot-water fuel.
Apply max(in_use x eta_water, 100%). Accredited Elmhurst worksheet for cert
100110101713 (golden fixture case 56, PCDB 100061): water (216) = 100.0000,
which we now match (was 77.13%). Combined with the space-heating PSR-
extension fix the cert lands 72.51 vs lodged 73 (|err| 18.32 -> 0.49).
Data-driven: only the single oversized-PSR cert moves (in-range heat pumps
keep their > 100% water COP, e.g. case 54 112.5%, case 55 179.6%). Corpus
(RdSAP-21.0.1 n=1000) MAE 0.726 -> 0.721, within-0.5 74.1% -> 74.2%.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
interpolate_heat_pump_efficiency_at_psr clamped to the smallest/largest PSR
row when the dwelling's plant size ratio fell outside the record's range.
That is the SAP 10.2 Appendix N rule for *combined heat-pump-and-boiler*
packages, not for a plain air/ground/water source heat pump.
Per Appendix N2 (PDF p.101, footnotes 44/45) a source heat pump whose PSR
exceeds the record's largest value takes a reciprocal-linear interpolation
between the largest-PSR efficiency and 100% at twice that PSR (100% beyond),
and 100% when the PSR is below the record's smallest value. Both the space-
and water-heating PSR-dependent efficiencies extend this way.
Effect: an oversized heat pump in a small dwelling is no longer credited the
full top-of-table COP. Accredited Elmhurst worksheet for cert 100110101713
(golden fixture case 56, PCDB 100061, PSR 3.107 over largest 2.0): (206)
334.4% -> 139.66% = Elmhurst exact. Corpus (RdSAP-21.0.1, n=1000) MAE
0.7397 -> 0.7258, within-0.5 0.7410 held; only two certs move (both
oversized-PSR heat pumps), 100110101713 +18.32 -> -4.97.
Exhaust-air and combined heat-pump-and-boiler packages have different
boundary rules (straight-to-100% / clamp-to-edge) but are not distinguished
by the current PCDB parse; the air/ground/water rule is applied uniformly,
a documented limitation noted in the function docstring.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Gate PV generation/credit in cert_to_inputs on gov-API pv_connection:
credit only when ==2 ('connected'); ==1 ('present but not connected to the
dwelling's meter') contributes zero to the dwelling's cost/CO2/PE per
RdSAP 10 §11.1 / SAP 10.2 Appendix M. Non-int (None / site-notes str) keeps
the credit-if-array behaviour, so the Elmhurst/Summary + synthetic paths are
unchanged (no regression).
Corpus: all 5 pv_connection=1 PV certs move inside ±0.5 (e.g. 100051118081
+6.5→+0.5); MAE 0.760→0.740, within-0.5 73.8→74.3%, no regression
(pv_connection=2 certs keep their credit).
Also corrects a now-load-bearing latent bug: the solar-recommendation
overlay tagged recommended arrays pv_connection=1 ('not connected') — which
the new gate would zero. A new install connects to the dwelling's meter, so
it must be 2; pinned by the overlay test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A gov-API flat can lodge dwelling_type="Mid-floor flat" while carrying its
own exposed roof — a top-floor flat mislabelled mid-floor. _dwelling_exposure
keyed roof exposure on the dwelling_type label alone, dropping the roof
heat-loss term: space-heating demand under-read ~32%, SAP over-read +7.
Fix: when the main building part lodges a *determined* roof_insulation_location
(an RdSAP integer code, not the "ND" Not-Defined party-ceiling sentinel),
expose the roof regardless of a contradictory label. Structured field, not a
description string and not roof_construction (which the gov-API lodges
building-wide on every unit, so it is not a per-unit signal).
On the RdSAP-21.0.1 corpus roof_insulation_location separates the classes with
zero disagreement: all 190 party-ceiling flats lodge "ND"; the 4 mid/ground
flats this exposes all move toward lodged, 0 away. within-0.5 73.3% -> 73.6%,
MAE 0.774 -> 0.761 (ratchets tightened). Verified end-to-end on the same
block: 715363 (location 6, RHI 2694) 81 -> 74 = lodged; genuine mid-floor
sibling 715395 (location ND, RHI 1024) stays party at 83 = lodged.
The override is additive (only ever exposes a label-dropped roof) and reads
the main part, so multi-part flats with a party main ceiling stay party.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Surface the hot-water (Table 13 / HP-DHW), secondary (direct-acting),
main-2 and ALL_OTHER_USES High-Rate Fractions on CalculatorInputs from
the same Table 12a helpers the SAP cost path uses, so Bill Derivation's
day/night split matches the rating's exactly.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Note that code 39 "any tariff" currently collapses to the standard electricity
rate; future work should resolve it to the dwelling's actual tariff (off-peak vs
standard) so off-peak electric heating prices correctly. Comment-only.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
modelling_e2e properties with main fuel 39 failed at the price boundary
(UnpricedFuelCode since #44fff767; previously mis-rated as non-electric →
the ~14-SAP over-rating flagged in earlier review).
Code 39 is SAP Table 12 "electricity, any tariff" (epc_codes.csv main_fuel 39 =
"electricity, unspecified tariff"; spec footnote (j): defines an electric system,
cost/CO2/PE = standard electricity). It was absent from API_FUEL_TO_TABLE_32, so
to_table_32_code(39) was None → is_electric_fuel_code(39) False and pricing
raised.
Fix: map API_FUEL_TO_TABLE_32[39] = 30 (standard electricity) — the canonical
place Khalim's fuel work added codes. One line makes classification, pricing,
CO2/PE and the billing carrier all agree (39 → 30 → ELECTRICITY).
Tests: to_table_32_code(39)==30, is_electric_fuel_code(39) True, price == standard
electricity, and the billing carrier resolves to ELECTRICITY. 0 corpus impact
(no lodged corpus cert uses 39); accuracy + mapper-corpus gates green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A dwelling's heating is one conceptual system, but its fields are scattered
across EpcPropertyData (a gov-API schema mirror): the cluster on sap_heating, the
electricity tariff on sap_energy_source.meter_type, hot-water flags loose at top
level. Three places synthesise a heating system — Measure Options, Landlord
Overrides, EPC Prediction's donor — and each hand-copied a different ad-hoc
subset. The override and donor both dropped meter_type, so an electric-storage
system landed on the template's single-rate meter and billed overnight heat at
the peak rate: property 713406 scored SAP 13 (G) vs ~50 (E), inflating the HHRSH
measure to +45.8 and overshooting the plan to band A.
Establish a single Coherent Heating System boundary (CONTEXT.md) that every
synthesiser must cover, with a source-appropriate fill policy (ADR-0035):
- Override overlay *completes* the partial system the landlord named. Companion
fields are now DERIVED from the SAP code, not hand-attached per archetype: the
off-peak meter from the calculator's single off-peak classification (new
OFF_PEAK_IMPLYING_HEATING_CODES = SAP §12 Rules 1-2), and an unobserved storage
charge control defaults to the conservative manual control (Table 4e 2401). So
adding a heating archetype is just adding its code — companions can't be
forgotten. A contract test guards it (every off-peak code drags a Dual meter).
- Prediction's heating donor now *carries* the donor's meter_type alongside its
sap_heating cluster — the donor is already coherent.
Coherence is a synthesis-time obligation only; the calculator still scores a real
lodged cert exactly as lodged.
Verified on 713406: baseline 13 -> 47.8 (E), matching its recorded rating; the
phantom HHRSH recommendation is gone and the plan no longer overshoots to A.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 Table 12d/12e: electric water heating on a 7-/10-hour tariff bills
CO2/PE at the high-rate code (32/34) and low-rate code (31/33), kWh-weighted
by the Table 13 high-rate fraction. The cost path already applied this split;
the CO2/PE factors did not — they used the flat annual Table 12 figure
(0.136 CO2 / 1.501 PE) for ALL dual-rate electric HW.
That flat-annual behaviour (slice S0380.163) was validated only against
HW-from-main "low-rate cost" certs (100% low, no high-rate split). It is NOT
how Elmhurst bills a whc-903 ELECTRIC IMMERSION: the hand-built case-50
worksheet (000565 + dual immersion, 7-hour) splits HW CO2/PE into "high rate
cost" (CO2 0.1475 / PE 1.5514) + "low rate cost" (CO2 0.1238 / PE 1.4429)
weighted by the Table 13 fraction 0.1009. So flat-0.136 for immersion HW was
a spec gap on our side, not an Elmhurst divergence.
Fix: `_electric_immersion_hw_high_rate_fraction` threads the Table 13 fraction
(scoped to whc-903, 7-/10-hour, cylinder data present) into the HW CO2 + PE
factor helpers, which then blend the Table 12d/12e high/low codes. The flat
rule is unchanged for HW-from-main and 18-/24-hour (no Table 12d split), so
the S0380.163 41-variant cases and the existing pin are untouched.
Case 50: rating CO2 2413.48 -> 2397.1237 = Elmhurst EXACT; demand CO2 2007.1384
EXACT; demand PE +111 -> +32.5 residual (within corpus PE noise). Corpus
unchanged 73.3% / MAE 0.774 / CO2 0.08 / PE 3.4 (62 whc-903 off-peak certs;
aggregate gauges hold). SAP unaffected (cost-based).
Pin: test_whc903_immersion_hw_co2_pe_factors_split_high_low_on_off_peak; doc
updated in SAP_CALCULATOR.md §8.1.
pyright strict gate not run locally (pyright not installed in this container).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 Table 12a Grid 2 (PDF p.191) bills "Fans for mechanical ventilation
systems" at 0.71 (7-hour) / 0.58 (10-hour), distinct from "All other uses"
(0.90 / 0.80) which covers circulation pumps, flue fans and the solar HW pump.
The cost-split mech-vent kWh (`mev_kwh_for_cost_split`) only summed the
decentralised-MEV (230b) fans, not the (230a) MVHR fan electricity — even
though the total pumps/fans bucket adds both. So an MVHR dwelling on an
off-peak tariff billed its fan electricity at the 0.90/0.80 "all other uses"
rate instead of 0.71/0.58. The comment already said "MEV/MVHR-fan portion";
only the MEV term was wired when MVHR landed. Fixed to mirror both
mechanical-ventilation fan terms summed into the total.
Worksheet-proven on simulated case 50 (000565 semi + MVHR Vent Axia + dual
electric immersion, Unknown meter -> 7-hour via the §12 dual-immersion
trigger): the fan bucket (315.64 kWh, 100% MVHR per worksheet line 230a) was
billing at 14.311 p/kWh (0.90) vs Elmhurst's 12.451 p/kWh (0.71) — +£5.87/yr,
-0.23 SAP. After the fix our existing-dwelling rating reconciles to Elmhurst
EXACTLY: SAP value 38.8426 (=Elmhurst 38.8426 -> 39), total cost £1317.0116
(=Elmhurst £1317.0116 to the penny).
Same `mev_kwh_for_cost_split` feeds the CO2 + PE cascades, so all three split
consistently. 0 corpus impact (all 3 corpus MVHR certs are standard tariff);
gauge unchanged 73.3% / MAE 0.774 / CO2 0.08 / PE 3.4.
Pin: test_mvhr_fan_electricity_bills_at_grid2_fan_fraction_on_off_peak.
pyright strict gate not run locally (pyright not installed in this container).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 Table 4a electric boilers (PDF p.170) split across three distinct
Table 12a Grid 1 SH rows (PDF p.191), not one "direct-acting" family as the
stale TODO in `_table_12a_system_for_main` implied:
- 191 Direct-acting electric boiler -> "Direct-acting electric boiler (a)"
row: 7-hour 0.90, 10-hour 0.50 (NOT the 1.00/0.50 "Other direct-acting
electric heating" room-heater row).
- 193/194/195/196 Electric dry core / water storage boiler -> "Electric dry
core or water storage boiler" row: 7-hour 0.00 (charged wholly off-peak =
100% low rate, identical to the None fallback).
- 192 Electric CPSU -> Appendix F; left falling through to None (off-peak
low) until the Appendix-F high-rate cascade is implemented.
The enum + fractions already existed in table_12a.py; only the code->enum
mapping was missing. Resolves the TODO and pins the spec-correct 0.00 for the
storage boilers so 195 can't be mis-"fixed" up to a direct-acting fraction.
Forward guard, 0 corpus impact: storage boilers already billed 100% low via
the None fallback, and all corpus 191 certs are on standard tariff (Table 12a
off-peak split never fires). Corpus gauge unchanged 73.3% / MAE 0.774.
Pin: test_electric_boilers_191_195_map_to_distinct_table_12a_grid1_rows.
pyright strict gate not run locally (pyright not installed in this container).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 Table 3a (PDF p.160) additional combi loss (61)m. Two coupled
defects, both surfaced by simulated case 49 (000565 + gas combi, U985
"Combi keep hot type = None") sitting at SAP 71.43 vs the worksheet's 72:
1. The cascade defaulted EVERY non-PCDB combi to the flat keep-hot
time-clock row (600 × n/365). A combi WITHOUT a keep-hot facility uses
row 1 (600 × fu × n/365, fu = V_d/100 when daily HW < 100 L/day) —
over-counting (61)m for the no-keep-hot cohort. `water_heating_from_
cert` now defaults to the "without keep-hot" row.
2. `pcdb_combi_loss_override` returned None for keep_hot_facility=1/
timer=1, leaning on the OLD flat-600 default. So flipping the default
silently turned 190 corpus PCDB keep-hot-time-clock combis into
no-keep-hot. Fixed to return the flat keep-hot row EXPLICITLY.
Key insight (the Summary is the input echo; the U985 keep-hot line is a
computed OUTPUT, so it must be derivable): keep-hot rides on the PCDB
boiler record (Table 105 keep_hot_facility/timer), resolved by
`pcdb_combi_loss_override`. A generic SAP-code combi with no PCDB record
(case 49, PCDF ref 0) has no keep-hot by construction → row 1. So the
default is not a guess — it is the spec-correct value for non-PCDB combis.
Worksheet-proven: case 49 → cost £726.696, SAP 72 — matching the
accredited worksheet to the digit (continuous 71.6945 = the worksheet's
own 71.6945). 000516 (keep-hot None) also exact (£860.716, SAP 63);
000490 (PCDB 10328, keep_hot_facility=1/timer=1) keeps its flat-600 via
the PCDB path. Masked until now because every prior combi-loss worksheet
fixture was keep-hot (000490/000474/000480 time-clock) or had V_d >= 100
every month (001431, rows coincide); case 49 is the first no-keep-hot one.
Corpus within-0.5 72.7% -> 73.3%, MAE 0.781 -> 0.774, PE 3.5 -> 3.4;
ratcheted _MAX_SAP_MAE 0.785 -> 0.775, _MAX_PE_PER_M2_MAE 3.6 -> 3.5.
Note: pyright strict type gate not run locally (pyright not installed).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Extends the dMEV intermittent-fan fix (4db05e84) to MVHR. A balanced
whole-house MVHR system IS the dwelling's ventilation, so the lodged (7a)
intermittent-extract-fan count is explicit — a lodged 0 means 0, not the
RdSAP 10 Table 5 age-band "unknown" default. The cascade was substituting
the default (here 20 m³/h) into worksheet line (8) openings, inflating
(16/18) infiltration → (21) → (22b) → (25) effective ach → (38)
ventilation heat loss → the space-heating demand.
Worksheet-proven on simulated case 49 (000565 + Vent Axia 500140 MVHR,
lodged (7a)=0): our (8) openings 0.0723 -> 0.0000, (18) 0.7223 -> 0.6500,
(25)m Jan 0.9423 -> 0.8571, all now matching Elmhurst exactly; space-
heating demand 7857 -> 7528 kWh (worksheet 7546). SAP 70.90 -> 71.43
continuous. (The residual to the worksheet's 72 is its own continuous SAP
71.69 rounding up, driven by a separate gas-combi water-heating-loss gap,
not ventilation.)
Scoped to EXTRACT_OR_PIV_OUTSIDE + MVHR only — MV-without-HR
(mechanical_ventilation=1) stays on the default-substitution path
(forcing its lodged 0 regressed 47 Howsman / 18 Jutland and is not
worksheet-validated). Corpus within-0.5 holds 72.7%, MAE 0.782 -> 0.781.
Note: pyright strict type gate not run locally (pyright not installed).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
MVHR (24a) heat-recovery support, part 2: the mapper + cascade wiring.
Both source paths now resolve balanced whole-house MV with heat recovery
to the MVHR kind:
- gov-API: `_API_MECHANICAL_VENTILATION_TO_KIND` 4 → "MVHR" (was None /
treated as natural — under-stated ventilation heat loss, over-rating).
- Elmhurst Summary: `_ELMHURST_MV_TYPE_TO_KIND` "Mechanical ventilation
with heat recovery (MVHR)" → "MVHR" (was UnmappedElmhurstLabel, which
blocked the whole Summary for MVHR dwellings).
cert_to_inputs resolves the in-use heat-recovery efficiency + SFP for an
MVHR cert (`_mvhr_system_values`): pick the PCDB Table 323 data point by
the lodged wet-room count (SAP 10.2 §2.6.4), multiply the raw efficiency
by the Table 329 ducts-inside-envelope in-use factor (0.90) and the raw
SFP by the per-duct-type factor (rigid 1.4), and feed:
- the §2.6.6 eq (2) effective-air-change credit (23c) → (24a)/(25)m;
- the (230a) fan electricity (in-use SFP × 1.22 × V), costed but NOT
added to the Table 5a gains (its effect is in the efficiency).
An MVHR lodged with no PCDF index falls back to the SAP 10.2 Table 4g
default (raw efficiency 66% × 0.70, raw SFP 2.0 × 2.5).
Worksheet-proven on simulated case 49 (000565 semi + Vent Axia Sentinel
Kinetic B 500140 + gas combi → Elmhurst Current SAP 72): every MVHR line
matches Elmhurst exactly — (33) fabric heat loss 100.5923, (23c) in-use
efficiency 81.9% = 91 × 0.90, (25)m Jan 0.8571, (230a) fan electricity
415.9325, (231) total pumps/fans 501.9325. The residual SAP 71 vs 72 is
the known 000565-family space-heating-demand artifact (same -1/-2 seen on
cases 47/48), not the MVHR logic.
Corpus: within-0.5 72.6% -> 72.7%, MAE 0.788 -> 0.782, PE 3.6 -> 3.5.
The 3 gov-API MVHR certs: Flat 1 +6 -> 0 (Table 4g default path) and
12a Princes Gate +3 -> +1 (heat-recovery credit); Apartment 707 -4 -> -6
is a separate baseline under-rate (it under-rated as natural too — the
MVHR credit correctly adds ventilation loss per Elmhurst's method).
Ratcheted _MAX_SAP_MAE 0.79 -> 0.785, _MAX_PE_PER_M2_MAE 3.7 -> 3.6.
Note: pyright strict type gate not run locally (pyright not installed).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
MVHR (24a) heat-recovery support, part 1: the PCDB data layer.
PCDB Table 323 (PCDF Spec Rev 6b §A.18, Format 426; pcdb10.dat carries
Format 431, header `$323,431,...`) holds the per-wet-room SFP + heat-
exchanger efficiency for centralised MEV / MVHR units. Added
`MvhrRecord` / `MvhrDataPoint`, `parse_centralised_mv_row` /
`parse_table_323`, the ETL step, the committed jsonl, and the
`mvhr_record(pcdb_id)` runtime lookup (mirrors Table 322).
SAP 10.2 §2.6.4/§2.6.6: "MVHR ... SFP is a single value depending on the
number of wet rooms" — each test group's leading field is the wet-room
count; callers select the group matching the dwelling lodgement.
Worksheet-proven on simulated case 49 (000565, 2 wet rooms, Vent Axia
Sentinel Kinetic B 500140 → flow 21.0, SFP 0.88, efficiency 91%).
Also decoded the MVHR heat-recovery efficiency in-use factor from Table
329 (Format 432): system_type 3 ducts-inside-envelope = 0.90 (case-49
(23c) = 91 × 0.90 = 81.9%), cross-checked against system_type 10 = 0.70
(= SAP 10.2 Table 4g default heat-recovery in-use factor). "Table 4h is
no longer used – data now stored in the PCDB" (SAP 10.2 p.176).
The outside-envelope efficiency columns + with-scheme SFP blocks are
preserved verbatim in `raw` (no fixture exercises them yet).
Note: pyright strict type gate not run locally (pyright not installed).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Chasing the space-heating demand gap on "simulated case 48" (main 691 + Unknown
meter + 903 dual immersion): our SAP 55 vs Elmhurst 57. Every §10a cost line
already matched to the penny; the residual was demand — our space-heating
energy 3849.8 kWh vs Elmhurst 3513.8 (+9.6%). Traced through the worksheet: our
ventilation heat loss (38) ran ~35.5 W/K vs Elmhurst 27.76 — we were adding 20
m3/h of intermittent extract fans (the Table 5 age-band default) on a dwelling
with a decentralised mechanical extract (dMEV) system that lodges 0 fans.
SAP 10.2 §2 (PDF p.13): a whole-house mechanical EXTRACT system provides
extraction via the (23a) 0.5 system air-change rate; the lodged intermittent
extract-fan count (7a) is then explicit — a lodged 0 means 0 (the dMEV is the
ventilation), NOT "unknown". The Table 5 default is an unknown-fallback for
NATURALLY ventilated dwellings only, so it must not be substituted here.
Fix: for EXTRACT_OR_PIV_OUTSIDE, take vc.intermittent_fans as-is (no age-band
default). Worksheet-proven on two dMEV builds of cert 000565: "case 48" lodges
(7a)=0 -> our SAP 55 -> 57 EXACT; the original 000565 fixture lodges (7a)=2 and
keeps 2 (its e2e pins are unchanged). An earlier draft that forced fans=0 broke
000565 (which legitimately has 2) — corrected to "lodged as-is".
within-0.5 72.5% -> 72.6%, MAE 0.789 -> 0.788; CO2/PE unchanged. The fix also
reduces a systematic under-rating bias in the 21-cert dMEV cohort (median dSAP
-0.22 -> -0.08). Scoped to EXTRACT_OR_PIV_OUTSIDE; balanced MVHR/MV kinds left
untouched pending their own worksheet. SAP-schema regression
test_18_0_0 pin 80 -> 81 (closer to its lodged 84, same cause). Spec-pinned in
test_cert_to_inputs (dMEV-lodged-0 vs natural-default). pyright not installed
in this container -- strict type gate not run locally.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes the follow-up from 22fe4f41. RdSAP 10 §12's third Unknown-meter
exception bullet — "main heating is ground source or water source heat pump" —
was unimplemented. Add `_GROUND_OR_WATER_SOURCE_HEAT_PUMP_CODES` (Table 4a,
SAP 10.2 PDF p.176-177: ground 211/215/221/225 + warm-air 521/525; water
213/216/223/226 + warm-air 523/526) to the Unknown-meter off-peak triggers;
once dual, Rules 1-4 (Rule 3) resolve it to 10-hour.
AIR-source heat pumps (214/217/224/227, 524/527) are deliberately EXCLUDED —
the spec names only ground/water source. Verified the only Unknown-meter heat
pumps in the corpus are "3/10 Bedford House" (main 214 = AIR source), which
correctly KEEP STANDARD. 0 corpus certs carry a GSHP/WSHP on an Unknown meter,
so this is a spec-completeness forward guard (gauge unchanged 72.5% / 0.789),
same family as the Scotland-J wall / rafters-M roof 0-impact spec fixes.
Coverage gap noted in-code: a database-index heat pump without a 211/213-style
SAP code can't have its source type read from the code alone (rare).
Spec-pinned (test_unknown_meter_ground_or_water_source_heat_pump_triggers_off_
peak). Gates green: corpus 72.5%/0.789, batch worksheet 0 raised/0 diverge,
suite 2989 passed (2 known pre-existing fails). pyright not installed locally.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Supersedes the previous "verified non-fix" doc (3548f1f3): the spec DOES make
this a fix — Khalim was right that the Unknown-meter branch is driven by the
heating/water system, not a blanket STANDARD.
RdSAP 10 §12 (PDF p.62): "If the electricity meter is unknown, treat as single
meter EXCEPT where main heating OR WATER HEATING are intended to run off an
off-peak tariff (per systems listed in the text box above) ... If that results
in a dual meter, assign tariff per rules 1 to 4." The text-box off-peak systems
include DUAL ELECTRIC IMMERSION. Our `rdsap_tariff_for_cert` only triggered the
Unknown→off-peak exception on a storage/CPSU MAIN — it ignored the
dual-electric-immersion WATER-heating trigger, so an Unknown-meter dwelling
with a non-storage main (e.g. room heaters) + dual immersion was billed
STANDARD (13.19p flat) when it should be dual → Rules 1-4 on the main.
Fix: thread `water_is_off_peak_dual_immersion` (whc 903 + immersion lodged dual
via `_immersion_is_single is False`) into the Unknown-meter branch; when any
text-box trigger is present, resolve via the same Rules 1-4 dispatch (room
heaters → Rule 3 → 10-hour). Single-immersion / instantaneous (whc 909) certs
correctly stay STANDARD (no text-box system).
Worksheet-validated on "simulated case 48" (main 691 + Unknown meter + 903 dual
immersion): Elmhurst 10-Hour Off Peak, SAP 57; ours 45 → 55 (7-hour gives 45,
confirming 10-hour). Flips exactly ONE corpus cert — Apartment 241 (the genuine
-5.38 under-rater, main 691 + dual immersion) -5.38 → -1.05; every other
Unknown+dual-immersion cert already has a storage main (Rule 2). Corpus
within-0.5 holds 72.5%, MAE 0.793 → 0.789 (improved). CO2/PE unchanged.
GSHP/WSHP-main trigger (the other §12 Unknown exception bullet) is a separate
follow-up. Gates green: corpus 72.5%/0.789, batch worksheet 0 raised/0 diverge,
000565 e2e 11/11, suite 2987 passed (2 known pre-existing fails). pyright not
installed in this container — strict type gate not run locally.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Khalim's hand-built "simulated case 48" Elmhurst worksheet (main 691 room
heaters + Unknown meter + 903 dual electric immersion + cylinder) proves
Elmhurst resolves an Unknown meter + Rule-3 room-heater main to 10-Hour Off
Peak — Elmhurst SAP 57; ours (STANDARD) 45; routing Unknown+Rule3 to off-peak
(10h) gives 55, 7h gives 45 (so Elmhurst uses 10-hour, RdSAP 10 §12 Rule 3,
PDF p.62). So the prior "Rule 3 is not off-peak evidence" comment was wrong
about Elmhurst's behaviour.
But adopting it REGRESSES the lodged-register corpus 72.5%->71.8% / MAE
0.793->0.827: of 11 Unknown+Rule-3 corpus certs only Apartment 241 improves
(-5.38->-1.05); the other 10 overshoot +2.7..+9.1 (Flat 2 +9.11). The
register's meter_type=3 certs were lodged with STANDARD-tariff costing — the
gov-API "Unknown" is lossy and does not mean off-peak. North star is
reproducing the lodged register, not Elmhurst's deliberate-Unknown worksheet,
so KEEP STANDARD (same "Elmhurst != noisy register" family as
roof-windows/shutters).
Comment-only; no behaviour change (corpus gauge unchanged 72.5% / 0.793).
pyright not installed in this container — strict type gate not run locally.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
profile_corpus_error.py: print median signed error alongside the mean in each
feature bucket. The mean is dragged by fat-tail register anomalies (e.g. electric
room heaters mean -1.09 but median -0.01) — median is the outlier-resistant lens
for finding TRUE systematic slices, so hunt by |median|, not |signed|.
heat_transmission.py: document why permanent-shutter R is deliberately NOT applied
(Elmhurst uses R=0.04 curtains on every window incl. insulated shutters, proven on
case 46; API-path trial worsens MAE). Comment-only.
pyright not installed locally — strict type gate not run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two second-main fuel errors mis-cost a dual-main dwelling whose two main systems
burn different fuels (SAP 10.2 §10a worksheet (213) bills main 2 at its own fuel):
1. Off-peak/legacy scalar cost path (calculator.py + cert_to_inputs.py): main 2's
kWh was priced at main 1's `space_heating_fuel_cost_gbp_per_kwh` scalar. Split
main 1 vs main 2 and price main 2 at its OWN rate via the new
`_main_2_space_heating_fuel_cost_gbp_per_kwh` (+ CalculatorInputs field).
Scoped to a NON-electric second main (wood/oil/coal) — an electric second
main keeps main 1's scalar (its off-peak Table 12a split is the deferred §10a
slice; per-system splitting it regresses the off-peak electric cohort, certs
13 Parkers Hill / 34 Dunley Road). 0 corpus impact (no corpus cert has a
non-electric second main on an off-peak meter).
2. Elmhurst Summary mapper (mapper.py): when §14.1 omits the Fuel Type cell, a
fuel-fired second main (room-heater SAP code) inherited main 1's fuel. Derive
it from the SAP code's Table 4a category (solid 631-636 -> house coal, gas ->
mains gas, liquid -> oil) before the main-1 inherit, mirroring
`_elmhurst_secondary_fuel_from_sap_code` (same modal sub-fuel caveat). Boiler
codes (<601) still inherit main 1 (case 6 oil rads+UFH).
simulated case 47 (electric room heaters + solid room heaters 633): our SAP
37.81 -> 55.09 vs Elmhurst current 57 (residual is the wood-vs-coal sub-fuel the
Summary export does not carry). Corpus unchanged 72.5% / MAE 0.793; batch 0
raised / 0 diverge; 000565 e2e green. (mapper.py also carries an earlier,
behaviour-free roof-window doc comment.) Spec-cited unit pins added (AAA).
pyright not installed locally — strict type gate not run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
`table_32.unit_price_p_per_kwh` silently returned the mains-gas default
(3.48 p/kWh) for any fuel code it could not resolve to a Table 32 price or a
translatable gov-API enum. An unhandled fuel billed at the gas rate mis-costs
the dwelling (same failure mode as the dual-main wood-vs-electric over-cost).
Raise `UnpricedFuelCode` (new, mirrors MissingMainFuelType / UnmappedSapCode)
so the gap surfaces at the price boundary. `None` (no fuel lodged) still
defaults — callers resolve "no system" upstream.
0 corpus impact: all 1000 certs compute (every lodged fuel resolves), so this
is a forward guard against future/unmapped fuels. Unit pin added; existing
None-default test docstring tightened. pyright not installed locally — strict
type gate not run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Main heating system 2's space-heating fuel cost (worksheet (213)) was billed
at main system 1's Table 32 unit price (`main_2_high_rate_gbp_per_kwh` reused
`main_1_high_rate_gbp_per_kwh`). For a dual-FUEL pair this grossly mis-costs the
second main: cert 10032957680 "Copse Cottage" (main 1 electric room heaters
fuel 30, main 2 wood logs fuel 6) charged its 9481 kWh of wood at 13.19 p/kWh
instead of 4.23 p/kWh — +£850/yr → SAP 21.75 vs lodged 45.
Route main 2 through its own fuel code (`_main_fuel_code(details[1])`), mirroring
the existing secondary-fuel handling. Copse Cottage 21.75 -> 45.94. Corpus
within-0.5 holds 72.5%, SAP MAE 0.815 -> 0.793 (ratcheted ceiling 0.82 -> 0.80);
CO2/PE unchanged. Same-fuel dual mains (gas+gas) unaffected. Off-peak-tariff
dual-fuel mains still defer to the legacy scalar path (separate slice).
Spec-cited unit pin added (AAA). pyright not installed locally — strict type
gate not run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Table 5 reads "Number of extract fans if known; if number is unknown:
[age-band default]" — the default is an UNKNOWN-fallback, NOT a floor. The
cascade applied `max(lodged, table_5_default)`, flooring a genuinely-lodged
count up to the age-band minimum: e.g. an age H-M dwelling lodging 2 extract
fans was billed at the 6-8-room default of 3, over-counting ventilation line
(8) and the heat-loss coefficient. Fixed to `lodged if lodged > 0 else
default` (a lodged 0 is the Elmhurst/RdSAP "unknown" form → default; any
positive count is taken literally).
Surfaced by Khalim's Elmhurst stress worksheet (simulated case 46): this was
its last ventilation residual — our Jan effective ACH 9.14 -> 9.0748 (exact
match to the accredited worksheet), SAP 29 -> 30 = Elmhurst, cost £1496 vs
£1493. Corpus IMPROVED: within-0.5 71.6% -> 72.5%, MAE 0.819 -> 0.815 (the
max-flooring over-counted ventilation on every cert lodging fans below its
age default). Floor ratcheted 0.71 -> 0.72. pyright not installed locally.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When the main heating system does not heat every habitable room (heated rooms
< habitable rooms), SAP 10.2 Appendix A.2.2 assumes the unheated rooms are
served by a portable-electric secondary heater, so the Table 11 secondary
fraction (0.10 for a boiler main) must be costed at the electricity tariff —
even when the cert lodges no explicit secondary system.
`_secondary_fraction` previously returned 0 unless a secondary was lodged or
the main was a forced-secondary electric-storage code, dropping the assumed
secondary and billing 100% of space heat to the (cheaper) main fuel — an
over-rate. Added an `unheated_habitable_rooms` trigger plus
`_has_unheated_habitable_rooms(epc)`, which prefers the lodged
`any_unheated_rooms` flag and guards the gov-API `heated_rooms_count == 0`
"not provided" sentinel. The secondary fuel/efficiency cascade already
defaults to portable electric (code 693) when no secondary code is lodged.
Worksheet-validated on simulated case 46 (heated 4 < habitable 7, no lodged
secondary): the assumed 10% electric secondary (2289 kWh, ~£260) lifted our
SAP 39 -> 29.35 vs accredited Elmhurst 30 (cost £1502 vs £1493, within 0.6%).
Corpus UNCHANGED (71.6% / MAE 0.819): all 17 corpus certs with heated <
habitable already lodge an explicit secondary description, so the gov-API
path was already costing it; this only adds the assumed secondary where none
is lodged (Elmhurst / reduced-field path). pyright not installed locally.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
`u_window` hard-coded the 12 mm gap row for pre-2002 double/triple glazing
(double 2.8, triple 2.1), ignoring the lodged glazing gap. Table 24 splits
the pre-2002 rows by gap: double 6mm=3.1 / 12mm=2.8 / 16mm+=2.7; triple
6mm=2.4 / 12mm=2.1 / 16mm+=2.0 (PVC/wooden), with a metal-frame column
(+0.5/+0.5/+0.5 ish). Added a `glazing_gap` parameter + `_glazing_gap_row`
helper and wired `w.glazing_gap` through the synthesised-window caller in
heat_transmission.
Corpus impact nil by design: the gov-API mapper already resolves per-window
U gap-aware via `_API_GLAZING_TYPE_GAP_TO_TRANSMISSION` (e.g. code 3 + gap
"16+" → 2.7), so corpus certs use that lodged per-window U, not this fallback.
This aligns the reduced-field / worksheet fallback path with the mapper and
Table 24. Unknown gap still defaults to the 12 mm row.
(Metal frames are not distinguishable on the gov-API path — only a `pvc_frame`
boolean exists and Table 24 groups PVC+wooden — so the PVC/wooden U stands
there; the metal column applies only where frame material is lodged.)
Spec-pinned: pre-2002 double + triple gap-row tests. pyright not installed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The SAP rating is spec-floored at 1 ("if the result of the calculation is
less than 1, the rating is 1"). `sap_rating_integer` already clamps, but the
continuous `sap_score_continuous` did not — so a degenerate dwelling could
emit a physically impossible negative SAP. Apply the same max(1, …) floor to
the continuous value (the un-rounded part is for sensitivity near real
ratings, not for negative ratings).
Removes a -12.3 accuracy outlier on the committed corpus (cert 422000111926,
lodged at the floor of 1, was computing -11.3): within-0.5 70.2% -> 70.3%,
MAE 0.845 -> 0.833. Ratcheted the corpus MAE ceiling to 0.84. Unit-pinned in
test_calculator.
pyright not installed in this codespace (strict gate not run locally).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The gov-API lodges secondary fuel as an enum whose value can COLLIDE with a
different same-valued RdSAP 10 Table 32 / SAP 10.2 Table 12 fuel code:
- enum 9 = "dual fuel (mineral and wood)" vs Table code 9 = LPG SC11F
- enum 5 = "anthracite" vs Table code 5 = LPG (bulk)
The main-fuel boundary already canonicalises these (`_GOV_API_COLLISION_
FUELS`), but the SECONDARY-heating cost + CO2/PE paths never did — they took
the bare same-value lookup, so a dual-fuel room heater was priced as LPG
(3.48 vs dual-fuel 3.99 p/kWh) and emitted as LPG (CO2 0.241 vs 0.087),
and an anthracite secondary as bulk LPG (12.19 vs 3.64 p/kWh). The price
under-count over-rates SAP; the CO2 over-count inflates emissions.
Fix: add enum 9 to `_GOV_API_COLLISION_FUELS` (5 and 33 were already there)
and canonicalise the secondary fuel code on both the cost
(`_secondary_fuel_cost_gbp_per_kwh`) and factor (`_secondary_fuel_code`)
paths, mirroring the main-fuel boundary. canonical_fuel_code only touches
{5,9,33}, so genuinely Table-coded secondaries (House coal 11, wood logs 20,
community fuels 30-32) are left unchanged — confirmed by a full-map audit.
Corpus: within-0.5 69.7% -> 70.2% (MAE 0.854 -> 0.845; dual-fuel-secondary
cohort 42.9% -> 49.0%, signed +0.55 -> +0.41) and CO2 MAE 0.12 -> 0.08 t/yr
(bias +0.04 -> 0.00). Ratcheted the corpus floors (within 0.70, MAE 0.85,
CO2 0.09, PE 4.0). A prior session deferred enum 9 ("direction not
understood") while the EPC PE/CO2 lens was confounded by the climate-cascade
bug (fc7c4d2d); on the corrected lens the over-rate direction is clear.
pyright not installed in this codespace (strict gate not run locally).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The SAP/EI rating is computed on UK-average weather (Appendix U Tables
U1-U3 region 0) so ratings are nationally comparable, but Appendix U
paragraph 1 (PDF p.124) requires that "other calculations (such as for
energy use and costs on EPCs) are done using local weather. Weather data
for each postcode district are taken from the PCDB". `Sap10Calculator.
calculate` ran ONE cascade (UK-average) and fed it to SAP, CO2 AND primary
energy, so every cert's EPC-displayed CO2/PE were computed on the wrong
climate. Because most of England is warmer than the UK-average, this
systematically OVER-counted heating demand on the emissions/PE outputs.
The two cascades (`cert_to_inputs` rating, `cert_to_demand_inputs`
postcode) already existed; this wires the demand cascade into the
production entry point and grafts its CO2/PE onto the rating result (SAP
unchanged). The corpus gauge's longstanding +5% CO2/PE over-estimate was
mostly this climate bug, NOT (as previously diagnosed) per-cert mapper
fidelity:
CO2 MAE 0.26 -> 0.12 t/yr (bias +0.18 -> +0.04)
PE MAE 13.6 -> 3.8 kWh/m2 (bias +9.0 -> +0.24)
SAP within-0.5 = 69.7% (rating cascade, unchanged)
Worksheet-validated to 1e-4 on simulated case 45 (heat-pump ground-floor
flat, postcode W6): the P960 prints the current dwelling twice — Block 1
on UK-average weather (SAP 60.5318, CO2 692.13) and Block 2 on postcode
weather (CO2 626.78, PE 6581.59). Both reproduce exactly. Added a tracked
case-45 Summary fixture + two-cascade cascade pin as a permanent guard,
and ratcheted the corpus CO2/PE ceilings to 0.13 / 4.2. The e2e Elmhurst
suite (Block-1 line refs) now pins the rating cascade directly; the two
Vaillant overlay snapshots refreshed to demand-cascade CO2/PE.
pyright not installed in this codespace (strict gate not run locally);
change is type-trivial (dataclasses.replace over SapResult).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When a heat-pump cert lodges a PCDB Table 362 record, the APM override
set BOTH the space efficiency (N3.6) and the water efficiency (N3.7a)
from the heat pump unconditionally. But the PCDB η_water applies only
when the DHW is heated BY the heat pump (water-heating code "from main":
901/902/914). A separate electric immersion (WHC 903) heats the water at
100% regardless of the space system, so applying the HP's water SCOP
(187.5% × 0.6 in-use = 112.5%) under-counted the immersion's hot-water
fuel.
Gate the η_water override on the DHW-from-main codes; a separate immersion
keeps its own 100% efficiency. Space η_space still always uses the APM
value (the heat pump is the space main).
Worksheet-validated to 1e-4 on simulated case 45 (HP space + WHC-903
immersion): water fuel (62) 1893.57 -> 2130.2639, total cost (255)
619.7433, CO2 692.13 — all matching the P960 exactly; SAP 60.53 -> rounds
to the worksheet's 61. RdSAP-21.0.1 corpus unchanged (no HP+WHC903 certs
in it). Pinned in test_cert_to_inputs (immersion fuel is main-independent).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The flat floor-exposure heuristic keys on dwelling_type: a flat defaults
to has_exposed_floor=False (assuming a heated dwelling below). The
Elmhurst Summary path lodges a ground-floor flat's vertical position as a
"Ground floor" floor_type rather than the API floor_heat_loss=1 exposed
code, and the mapper can label such a flat "Top-floor flat" — so the
cascade dropped the ground floor entirely (a ground floor is in contact
with the ground and carries heat loss).
Treat a "ground floor" floor_type as a heat-loss floor, overriding the
dwelling-level suppression upward — mirroring the existing "another
dwelling below" party override downward.
Worksheet-validated to 1e-4 on simulated case 45 (a ground-floor flat
the mapper labelled "Top-floor flat"): floor (28a) 0 -> 25.38 W/K,
fabric (33) 75.63 -> 101.0104, HTC (39) 112.93 -> 145.3579, all matching
the P960 exactly; SAP 67.81 -> 62.52. RdSAP-21.0.1 corpus within-0.5
69.5% -> 69.7% (MAE 0.859 -> 0.854). Floors ratcheted. Pinned in
test_heat_transmission (ground-floor billed + party-floor suppressed).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The deduplicated `epc.roofs[]` list cannot be indexed 1:1 against the
building parts (190/329 multi-part certs have len(roofs) != len(parts)),
so every part's `u_roof` consumed a SINGLE join of all roof descriptions.
That leaked one part's insulation state onto another: a "Flat, no
insulation" extension dragged a "Pitched, insulated (assumed)" main roof
to the uninsulated 2.30, ~3x over-stating its heat loss. 3-part certs
systematically under-rated (56% within-0.5, mean -0.79 SAP).
Partition the non-RR roof descriptions into flat vs pitched/sloping and
match each part to its own kind (`_main_roof_descriptions_by_kind`),
falling back to the global join when a part's kind has no matching entry.
Corpus cert 100010129331: roof 110.5 -> 31.3 W/K, +13.10 -> -0.05 SAP.
RdSAP-21.0.1 within-0.5 68.8% -> 69.5% (MAE 0.888 -> 0.859; PE 13.9 ->
13.6); 3-part cohort 56% -> 61%. Floors/ceilings ratcheted. Pinned in
test_heat_transmission (by_kind split + mixed-roof no-contamination).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Close the §6.1 conservatory demand cascade per RdSAP 10 §6.1 + Table 25.
Solar gains (§6, solar_gains.py) — Table 25 note (PDF p.51): "The
orientation of windows in a conservatory is not recorded, thus solar
gains are calculated using the default solar flux (East/West orientation,
with 20° pitch for roof windows)." The glazed wall bills onto the (76)
East line (vertical, average-overshading Z); the glazed roof onto the
(82) roof-window line (20° pitch, Z=1.0), both at Table 25 g=0.76, FF=0.70.
TFA-occupancy (mapper) — §6.1: the conservatory floor area is added to the
dwelling total floor area. TFA drives occupancy → §5 internal gains + §4
hot-water demand, so the non-separated conservatory's floor area now
enters `EpcPropertyData.total_floor_area_m2` (the worksheet's (4) = 95.38
carries it). Separated conservatories (§6.2) stay excluded.
Pinned against the case-44 P960 demand cascade at abs=1e-4: (73) internal
gains 625.1759, (83) solar gains 495.8655, (95) useful gains 1079.6510,
(99) space heating per m² 89.8073 — the full §6.1 chain reproduces EXACTLY.
The whole-dwelling SAP (72.9517) / CO2 (3241.8656) are not pinned: the
case-44 Summary omits the House-Coal secondary heater (SAP 633) the P960
descriptor carries (cf. case 43), so the cascade computes no secondary —
the entire residual (+349.77 kg CO2). A Summary-input defect, independent
of §6.1; every conservatory-affected line ref is exact. Worksheet harness
stays 47/47 0-raised; corpus unchanged (API path; mirror is the next slice).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 §2 (17)-(18): a measured/design air permeability at 50 Pa from a
Blower Door test routes infiltration via `(18) = AP50/20 + (8)`, in
preference to the components-based (16) estimate. The Elmhurst extractor
read only the AP4 ("Pulse") column of §12.2, so a Blower Door result
(§12.2 "Pressure Test Result (AP50)") fell through to the structural-
infiltration default — over-counting ventilation heat loss.
Surfaced by simulated case 44 (AP50 4.50): effective air change rate was
0.81 vs the worksheet's 0.58 (+38% ventilation loss). The cascade already
supports `air_permeability_ap50` (preferred over AP4); this wires the read
end to end (extractor → ElmhurstSiteNotes → SapVentilation → cert_to_inputs).
Pinned against the case-44 P960 §2 at abs=1e-4: (18) infiltration 0.3417
(= 4.5/20 + 0.1167) and (25) Jan effective ach 0.5812. Worksheet harness
stays 47/47 0-raised.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP-Schema-16.2 (datatypes/epc/domain/mapper.py):
- 16.2 is structurally an RdSAP-17.1 cert under a different name; add
_normalize_sap_schema_16_2 (field renames + defaults) and dispatch to the
tested from_rdsap_schema_17_1 mapper. uprn_100020933699 maps → SAP 71.
- Honour a "Single glazed" windows description when multiple_glazing_type="ND"
(was defaulting to double) → RdSAP-21 code 5; eng 72→71 (lodged 70).
- 4 regression tests + sap_16_2.json fixture; 0 new pyright errors.
Flat party-wall fix (domain/sap10_calculator/worksheet/heat_transmission.py):
- Full-SAP flats carry flatness in dwelling_type, not property_type, so the
party-wall default fell through to the 0.25 house value instead of the RdSAP
Table-15 flat 0.0. Add _is_flat_or_maisonette_dwelling fallback + regression
test. uprn_10093116529 80→81 (matches the cert's lodged party u_value 0).
Accuracy corpus pins (tests/domain/sap10_calculator/test_real_cert_sap_accuracy.py):
- uprn_10093116543 (SAP-17.1 gas-combi semi): engine 81 (Elmhurst 77; documented
full-SAP→RdSAP residual — measured wall/floor U + PCDB boiler vs RdSAP defaults).
- uprn_10093116529 (SAP-17.1 g/f flat): engine 81 (Elmhurst 78).
devcontainer: add poppler-utils (pdfinfo) for the documents-parser PDF fixtures.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Wire the non-separated conservatory into the §3 heat-transmission +
§1 dimensions cascade per RdSAP 10 §6.1 (PDF p.49) + Table 25 (p.51):
"The floor area and volume of a non-separated conservatory are added to
the total floor area and volume of the dwelling. Its roof area is taken
as its floor area divided by cos(20°), and wall area is taken as the
product of its exposed perimeter and its height. ... The conservatory
walls and roof are taken as fully glazed ... Glazed walls are taken as
windows, glazed roof as rooflight."
New `worksheet/conservatory.py` derives the geometry:
- height from the equivalent storey count (§6.1: 1 storey → ground-floor
room height; 1½ → ground + 0.25 + 0.5×first; etc.);
- glazed WALL → window (27) at Table 25 U (double 3.1 / single 4.8) with
the §3.2 curtain resistance (R=0.04) → U_eff 2.758;
- glazed ROOF → rooflight (27a) at Table 25 roof U (double 3.4 / single
5.3) + curtain → U_eff 2.993;
- FLOOR → (28a) via BS EN ISO 13370 as an uninsulated SOLID ground floor
with 300 mm walls (§5.12, spec p.43), exposed perimeter = glazed
perimeter → U 0.89;
- glazed wall + roof + floor areas join (31)/(36); the fully-glazed
structure walls/roof add nothing (the glazing IS the window/rooflight).
`dimensions_from_cert` adds the conservatory floor area to TFA (4) and
floor area × height to volume (5) (feeds ventilation (8)), without making
it a storey (avg storey height for §2 infiltration is unchanged).
Pinned against the simulated case-44 P960 §3 at abs=1e-4 — every line ref
EXACT: (4) 95.3800, (5) 257.1630, (27) 96.1169, (27a) 38.2201, (28a)
21.4164, (29a) 35.5852, (30) 7.4688, (31) 294.2900, (33) 207.3274,
(36) 23.5432. The remaining whole-dwelling SAP/CO2 gap is the §6 solar
gains, closed in the next slice. Worksheet harness stays 47/47 0-raised.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The gov API lodges a manufacturer's declared cylinder loss factor
(kWh/day) in `sap_heating.cylinder_heat_loss`, in which case it leaves
the cylinder volume / insulation type / thickness None. That field was
undeclared on the 21.0.x schemas, so `from_dict` dropped it — then
`_cylinder_storage_loss_override` hit its insulation-None / volume-None
guards and returned None, dropping the §4 storage loss ENTIRELY. The
dwelling over-rated (the declared loss is typically ~1.5 kWh/day ≈
550 kWh/yr).
SAP 10.2 §4 branch a) (PDF p.136): when the declared loss factor is
known, storage loss (50) = (48) declared loss × (49) Table-2b
temperature factor — replacing the Table 2 V×L×VF computation.
- declare `cylinder_heat_loss` on RdSapSchema21_0_0/21_0_1.SapHeating +
EpcPropertyData.SapHeating; thread through the 21.0.x mappers.
- `cylinder_storage_loss_monthly_kwh` gains `declared_loss_kwh_per_day`:
when set, combined_55 = declared × TF (volume/insulation unused).
- `_cylinder_storage_loss_override` resolves the declared loss BEFORE the
insulation/volume guards (the gov omits those when the loss is lodged).
12 /tmp certs carry it (mean |err| 3.00 -> 2.51; the clean ones close
hard, e.g. 2360 2.65 -> 0.30, 0245 2.25 -> 0.53). Corpus within-0.5
67.0% -> 67.3% (MAE 1.025 -> 1.020); /tmp 71.2% -> 71.4% (0.889 ->
0.882). Worksheet harness 47/47; regression = only the 3 pre-existing
fails; pyright net-zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
