Commit graph

15 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
a80d6cad05 Re-pin the trigger-attributes fixture to one that still buys lighting 🟪
0390's floor+ASHP package reaches post 68.772, which publishes as 69 = band C,
so under ADR-0064 it now meets the goal and stops before low-energy lighting —
the same over-purchase the ADR removes, one level up at the package. 0380 fires
the same three measures with identical trigger attributes, so every assertion
stands unchanged, and it lands at post 74.4, clear of a band floor.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-21 16:57:22 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
4fcd23455b The multi-measure trigger fixture is a cert the sized ASHP alone cannot clear 🟩
Golden cert 0330 now reaches band C on the dwelling-sized ASHP alone
(ADR-0049), dropping its solid_floor_insulation companion; cert 0390
still fires three measures, so the per-measure trigger-attribute
assertions move there (and gain the lighting triggers).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-03 12:25:03 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
44752344a0 Re-pin golden cert 0036 to expect the zoned tune-up its PCDB boiler now fires (#1399)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-01 22:56:12 +00:00
Daniel Roth
10c975b1ae Fix test asserting None for cfl_fixed_lighting_bulbs_count on 21.0.1 cert 🟩
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-24 13:31:02 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
fffb07d04b test(harness): re-pin golden-cert plans to the gain-maximising packages
Three more pre-existing failures (present at 9ee38211, before this branch's
recent commits; same family as the orchestration multi-measure re-pin) —
golden-cert plan expectations that predate the ASHP generator (ADR-0025)
and the optimiser folding forced dependencies into candidate gain (ADR-0016):

- test_console: a multi-measure plan now leads with air_source_heat_pump,
  not cavity_wall_insulation (which is dropped — its forced ventilation makes
  the pair net-negative). Assert a measure actually in the package.
- test_report 0330: package is now {solid_floor_insulation, air_source_heat_
  pump}; cavity_wall + forced mechanical_ventilation correctly excluded.
- test_report 0036: gain-maximising package is now {solid_floor_insulation,
  low_energy_lighting}.

Same verified-correct optimiser evolution as 077e3a39 (cavity_wall +2.9 SAP
alone but its forced fabric→ventilation dep drags the pair net-negative).
Re-pin to the actual packages + their trigger fields; the forced wall→vent
edge stays covered by test_measure_dependency / test_optimiser.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-15 13:57:27 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
b211715750 feat(modelling): wire secondary-heating-removal into the pipeline (ADR-0028)
Orchestrator runs recommend_secondary_heating_removal; report._triggers_for
explains it via the lodged secondary_heating_type; harness catalogue + ARA seed
price it. Re-pins the golden/integration plans it shifts: it is a cheap (\£250)
SAP lever, so on gas-main certs lodging an electric secondary (691) it displaces
the \£12k ASHP (0330, 0036) or joins the all-beneficial-measures package (000490,
where its marginal SAP is 0 under the category-4 ASHP but the heater is still
physically removed). Consistent with the optimiser's existing kitchen-sink
package behaviour.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 16:04:07 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
07f534ee11 feat(modelling): system tune-up options (standard + zone controls)
Add the system tune-up to the heating Recommendation: keep the existing wet
boiler but install better heating controls and fix the cylinder. Two competing
Options (the Optimiser picks <=1 across the whole heating rec) per the user's
two best control end-states:

- system_tune_up        — standard controls (programmer + room thermostat +
  TRVs, SAP 10.2 Table 4e code 2106)
- system_tune_up_zoned  — time-and-temperature zone control (code 2110, type 3):
  more SAP uplift for more cost

Both keep the boiler (no fuel / SAP code / flue change), set the control
ABSOLUTELY to their end-state, and apply the conditional cylinder fixes (an
80 mm jacket when under-insulated, a thermostat when absent — only when a
cylinder exists). Each control option is offered only when it genuinely improves
the existing control — standard is skipped when the control is already 2106 /
2110 / 2112, zone when already 2110 / 2112 — so neither is ever a downgrade or a
no-op.

Validated against the Elmhurst "system tune up" re-lodgements (cert 001431):
nine befores spanning controls 2101-2113 all converge to the two common afters,
proving the control overlay is absolute. The cascade pin is parametrised over
two starting controls (2101 "no control" + 2113 "room thermostat and TRVs") x
both afters, delta 0 (SAP/CO2/PE).

Wires the two MeasureTypes through contingencies (0.15), the offline catalogue
(500 / 900), the catalogue-coverage list, the report triggers, and the ARA
first-run seed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-10 10:20:46 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
3d108a9d9e feat(harness): explain gas_boiler_upgrade in the report triggers
Add the `gas_boiler_upgrade` branch to `report._triggers_for`, mirroring the
generator's eligibility guard so a cohort report explains why the boiler upgrade
fired: the wet-boiler SAP code, the mains-gas connection that makes the gas
end-state installable, and the cylinder presence that shapes the bundle (combi
vs regular + cylinder fixes).

No golden API cert selects the boiler upgrade (it competes with — and on houses
loses to — the ASHP bundle within the one heating Recommendation), so the branch
is covered by a direct `_triggers_for` unit test, following the repo pattern for
testing internal helpers (cert_to_inputs).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-10 08:44:37 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
037daa98ef test: reflect ASHP winning more often after the Vaillant swap
The efficient Vaillant aroTHERM plus 5 kW (ADR-0025) now raises SAP even on gas
dwellings, so the Optimiser selects the ASHP bundle far more often -- a deliberate
product shift (user-confirmed). Updated the integration/harness tests:
- ARA multi-measure: ASHP is additive to the kept fabric package -> add to set.
- ARA listed_uprn: is_listed blocks walls AND ASHP (blocks_internal); the gate is
  now observable via ASHP (selected unrestricted, blocked listed).
- report three-measures: ASHP + solid-floor displace the fabric stack; assert
  their triggers (property_type, main_heating_category / floor).
- console hhr + solid_wall coverage tests: assert the measure is OFFERED as a
  candidate (the wiring/eligibility intent), since ASHP now out-competes them in
  selection; also assert the optimised package leads with ASHP.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-06 21:49:12 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
f7863f986d feat(modelling): wire the lighting generator into the candidate pool
Slice 4 of the lighting generator (ADR-0023): run recommend_lighting in
_candidate_recommendations (no planning gate). Price low_energy_lighting in the
offline catalogue + contingency table (0.26, the legacy rate); the
_GENERATOR_MEASURE_TYPES forcing test enforces both. A run_modelling test pins
the wiring end-to-end (an incandescent-lit dwelling gets the LED upgrade in the
optimised package).

Downstream updates, all because lighting now fires on any cert with non-LED
bulbs: report.py gains the low_energy_lighting trigger (the non-LED counts); the
two golden-cert report tests and the multi-measure integration test now expect
low_energy_lighting alongside the fabric measures (the sample/golden EPCs lodge
low-energy-unknown bulbs); first-run integration seeds a low_energy_lighting
MaterialRow.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-05 12:39:54 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
ae267070b1 feat(modelling): flat per-property CSV for the inspection report
format_report_csv emits one comma-safe row per property: the calculator-error
fields (lodged/calculated/Δ/flag), the Plan headline figures (baseline+post
SAP/band, measures, cost+contingency, bill & CO2 savings, valuation %), the
flattened measure triggers, and any captured error — sortable in a spreadsheet
for a large dump.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-04 11:16:52 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
1c00708ecd feat(modelling): render the three-section inspection report as Markdown
format_report_markdown emits: (1) cohort parity stats + a per-property
lodged-vs-calculated table flagging |Δ| > 0.5 (errors shown inline),
(2) Plans + costings (SAP/band jump, cost + contingency, bill & CO2 savings,
valuation uplift), (3) each fired measure with the EPC attributes that
triggered it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-04 11:15:12 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
5e4906dd70 feat(modelling): cohort builder + cohort-level ParityReport
build_property_reports models a dump in order (errors captured per-cert);
parity_report_for aggregates the lodged-vs-calculated SAP across the cohort
into the existing ParityReport (MAE/RMSE/bias/worst-N), excluding certs that
couldn't be mapped or scored. Residual convention is the calculator's own
(predicted - actual), the negative of PropertyReport.sap_error.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-04 11:13:04 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
2b04dddb06 feat(modelling): surface each fired measure's trigger attributes
Section 3 of the report: build_property_report now runs the Modelling stage
and, for every Plan Measure, records the EPC attribute(s) that caused its
generator to fire (MeasureTrigger) — wall_construction/insulation for cavity
fill, roof thickness for loft, floor thickness/construction for floors, the
absent mechanical kind for ventilation. Modelling raises are captured as
plan_error, independent of the calculator-error capture.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-04 11:10:43 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
ecebb07c9e feat(modelling): calculator-error per property (lodged vs calculated SAP)
Section 1 of the property inspection report: PropertyReport compares the
cert's lodged energy_rating_current to Sap10Calculator's un-rounded SAP and
flags |Δ| > 0.5 (the ADR-0010/0013 shadow-validation design target). A
mapping/scoring raise is captured per-cert as calculator_error, never
propagated, so one bad cert can't abort the sweep.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-04 11:06:57 +00:00