RdSAP10 §5.12 Table 19 footnote (1): when floor_construction is unknown,
age bands A and B default to suspended timber, not solid. Previously
u_floor always used the BS EN ISO 13370 solid-floor formula, which
under-counted ~14% on pre-1929 dwellings.
Elmhurst worksheet U985-0001-000490 Main Dwelling (A=14.85, P=7.42,
w=0.400, age B) records floor U=0.71 W/m²K — the suspended-floor formula
on §5.12 page 46 reproduces this exactly. The solid branch returned 0.66.
Description prefixes "Solid, ..." / "Suspended, ..." take precedence over
the age-band default since they're explicit assessor observations.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Delete HANDOVER_FRESH_REVIEW (22-slice, MAE-5.34 era) and
HANDOVER_SYSTEMATIC_REVIEW (pre-Elmhurst-conformance). Both described
a state the Elmhurst worksheet work has since superseded.
Add HANDOVER_S3_CLOSE.md with:
- Accurate §3 status: §1/§2 fully done; LINE_31/LINE_36 exact for
non-RR fixtures; LINE_33 gap diagnosed as missing floor_construction
codes (not a window-area problem as previously assumed)
- Concrete investigation steps to close LINE_33 for 000474 + 000490
- Table 11 Secondary Heating framed as next slice after §3
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
LINE_31 (total external element area) = Σ_parts (gross_wall + roof +
floor). Window and door areas cancel in the net-wall expansion, so LINE_31
is independent of the window/door split. This lets us assert the exact
Elmhurst worksheet (31) for the two non-RR fixtures (000474, 000490)
without needing window-area input data.
LINE_36 = y × LINE_31 follows for free. Both 000474 and 000490 use age
band B throughout (y = 0.15), giving:
000474: 0.15 × 153.39 = 23.0085
000490: 0.15 × 164.85 = 24.7275
The per-storey-perimeter fix (e6c768c3) was the prerequisite; without it,
upper storeys with a smaller perimeter than the ground floor were
over-counted (e.g. 000474 Main: 7.07 m ground vs 5.27 m first storey).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Replace the string literal "Main Dwelling" / "Extension 1" comparisons
in `_building_part_aggregates` and the four affected tests with the
typed `BuildingPartIdentifier.MAIN` / `.EXTENSION_1` enum values, so
the transform is consistent with the typed domain introduced in the P6.1
cert→inputs adapter. Fixes a latent mismatch that would silently return
`main=None` if the string ever drifted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP §3 wall heat-loss area sums each storey individually:
`Σ (heat_loss_perimeter_i × room_height_i)`. Pre-fix used the short-cut
`ground_perimeter × avg_height × storey_count`, which over-counts upper
storeys whenever they have a smaller perimeter than the ground (set-back
top floors, ground-floor additions, etc.). RdSAP §5.10 party-wall area
follows the same per-storey-sum convention.
Surfaced by Elmhurst 000474 Main (ground perim 7.07, first 5.27): our
gross-wall over-counted by ~10 m², the (29a) W/K downstream by ~15 W/K
on this cert. Documented at the time as follow-up #2; this slice closes
it. The §3 partial-conformance test's gap-#2 entry is removed; gap #1
(RR sub-areas) remains.
Fix lives in two parallel code paths:
- dimensions.py: per-storey accumulation inside the existing fd loop
- heat_transmission.py: _part_geometry now emits gross_wall_area_m2 and
party_wall_area_m2 directly, dropping the avg_height + storey_count
intermediate fields (no other consumer)
Tests:
- New: gross_wall_area_sums_per_storey_perimeter_times_height_…
(2-storey main, ground 10 m / first 6 m, same height — expects
Σ=40 m² not ground×avg×count=50)
- New: party_wall_area_sums_per_storey_party_length_… (same shape,
ground party 5 / first party 3 → Σ=20 not 25)
- New: walls_w_per_k_uses_sum_of_per_storey_perimeter_… (heat-
transmission counterpart: 0.6 × 40 = 24 W/K not 30)
829 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP §2 (9) "ns" is the dwelling height — the tallest part — which drives
the (10) additional-infiltration adjustment. Pre-fix code summed
`len(sap_floor_dimensions)` across parts and incremented for every
sap_room_in_roof block, so a 2-storey main + 1-storey side extension
returned ns=3 instead of 2, and a 2-part RR-bearing cert could return
ns=4 or 5. The (10) ach output overstated by 0.1 per spurious storey.
Fix tracks per-part `(floor_count + 1 if RR else 0)` and emits
`max(per_part)`. TFA and volume sums on §1 are unaffected — those are
genuine Σ per RdSAP §3.9.1.
Surfaced by Elmhurst 000474 (2-storey + 2 side extensions): worksheet
says ns=2; we previously had to pass `storey_count=fixture.LINE_9_STOREYS`
explicitly in the §2 Elmhurst conformance test. With the fix, the test
now derives `storey_count` from `dims.storey_count` and the
`LINE_9_STOREYS` field cross-checks the derivation against (9).
Tests:
- New: dwelling_storey_count_is_max_across_parts_not_sum (2-storey main
+ 1-storey ext expects ns=2)
- New: room_in_roof_on_main_adds_one_to_dwelling_storey_count_only_once
(main with RR + ext without RR expects ns=3, not 5)
- Updated: main_plus_extension_sums_areas_perimeters_and_walls assertion
ns==2 → ns==1 (both parts single-storey)
- Updated: all_rir_shapes_apply_section_1_2_45m_convention_uniformly —
storey_delta is now ≤1 not len(parts_with_rr); TFA/volume deltas
remain Σ per the spec
- Updated: §2 Elmhurst test consumes dims.storey_count + asserts
dims.storey_count == fixture.LINE_9_STOREYS as an Arrange precondition
826 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Threads the strict BuildingPartIdentifier type (introduced in a8b443f6)
through the two remaining backend touchpoints:
- EpcBuildingPartModel.from_*: SQLModel column expects a string, so
unbox the enum with .identifier.value before binding to the DB.
- documents_parser end-to-end tests: swap bare-string equality
("main" / "extension_1") for identity checks against the enum
members (BuildingPartIdentifier.MAIN / EXTENSION_1).
Documents_parser test pack passes (105/105). No dedicated SQLModel test
covers EpcBuildingPartModel.from_*; the .value line is exercised
transitively via db_writer.py / local_runner.py in production.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Lands the production code that the just-committed Elmhurst conformance
fixtures (6455d48b) exercise: the SAP10.3 calculator orchestrator
(domain.sap.calculator.Sap10Calculator), the RdSAP-driven cert→inputs
mapper (domain.sap.rdsap.cert_to_inputs), and the EpcPropertyData
strict-type pass that P6.1 starts.
calculator.py is the entry point. Two surfaces depending on the caller's
shape:
- Sap10Calculator().calculate(epc) — full RdSAP mapper + worksheet loop
- calculate_sap_from_inputs(inputs) — pure physics over typed inputs
P6.1 introduces BuildingPartIdentifier as a strictly-typed replacement
for bare-string matching on SapBuildingPart.identifier (motivated by
the pain point at worksheet/dimensions.py:74-82). Two boundary factories
canonicalise raw inputs: from_api_string for the gov-EPC API, and
extension(n) for site-notes / construction id flows.
Also catches up two transitive deps that 6455d48b implicitly required
but I missed:
- ml/rdsap_uvalues.py — party-wall U-value rows that heat_transmission
resolves; the U=0.0 branch the 000516 fixture exercises lands here.
- ml/tests/_fixtures.py — make_minimal_sap10_epc that every Elmhurst
fixture imports. Without this catch-up, checking out 6455d48b in
isolation would ImportError.
Out of scope (will commit separately): ml/transform.py legacy envelope
drift; backend/ FastAPI + documents_parser layer; etl/ scratch.
824 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Lands real-cert ground-truth conformance tests for the SAP10.2 worksheet,
asserting our §1 dimensions, §2 ventilation, and §3 heat-transmission
output line-by-line against six Elmhurst-lodged worksheets (000474,
000477, 000480, 000487, 000490, 000516). Each fixture covers a distinct
shape: with/without room-in-roof, single-part vs main+extensions, age
A and B, party-wall U=0.0 vs U=0.25, 1/2/3 sheltered sides, varying
draught-proofing %, and the (12) suspended-timber quirk.
§1/§2/§3 module updates back the new line-refs (LINE_31 external-element
area, LINE_33 fabric loss, LINE_37 total fabric loss; per-fixture (12)
floor / (15) window / (21) shelter-adjusted ach; SapRoomInRoof storey
contribution via the 2.45 m §3.9.1 convention).
The §3 test currently asserts invariants only ((33) = Σ per-element,
(37) = (33) + (36)) because SapRoomInRoof only carries floor_area —
gable/slope/stud/flat-ceiling sub-areas the worksheet itemizes are not
yet modelled. LINE_3* constants capture the worksheet ground truth for
when that gap closes.
Adds a SAP-domain README with a step-by-step guide for adding new
Elmhurst fixtures from the assessor's PDF pair (Summary + worksheet),
including the field-by-field cert → EpcPropertyData mapping table and
the gotchas surfaced across the six fixtures (storey-height +0.25
convention, party-wall U code mapping, has_suspended_timber_floor flag
truth table, (25) effective-ach formula, Energy Rating vs EPC Costs
wind-speed trap).
366 tests pass (was 360 pre-pairs 5-6).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Wires slice 1-5 primitives into a deployable splitter:
- orchestration/postcode_splitter_orchestrator.py: PostcodeSplitterOrchestrator
loads addresses via UserAddressRepository, groups by postcode via
iter_postcode_grouped_batches, persists each batch under
ara_postcode_splitter_batches/{task_id}/{subtask_id}/, creates a WAITING
child SubTask, and publishes an address2UPRN SQS message per batch.
- applications/postcode_splitter/: Lambda entrypoint. handler.py is decorated
with @subtask_handler() so the parent SubTask lifecycle is decorator-owned;
PostcodeSplitterTriggerBody validates the body. Dockerfile is the
python:3.11 Lambda base with the DDD-shaped source layers and no pandas.
- tests/orchestration/test_postcode_splitter_orchestrator.py: integration
test using moto S3 + moto SQS + in-memory SQLite that exercises the full
wiring against a fixture CSV spanning three postcode groups (one
oversize) and asserts child count, persisted inputs, queue bodies, and
dispatch order.
backend/postcode_splitter/ and .github/workflows/deploy_terraform.yml are
intentionally unchanged: the dockerfile_path flip is deferred until the
companion backend/address2UPRN/ migration is also ready.
The wrapped function now receives the decorator-owned TaskOrchestrator as
a third positional argument so handlers can compose their own use-case
orchestrator that shares the session, instead of opening a second Postgres
connection per invocation.
Both existing callers (backend/ordnanceSurvey/main.py and
backend/bulk_address2uprn_combiner/main.py) have their signatures extended
to accept the new positional argument (typed Optional[TaskOrchestrator] so
the legacy backend.utils.subtasks.subtask_handler — which only passes two
args — keeps working until the migration to the new decorator lands).
@task_handler is intentionally unchanged in this slice; symmetry is
deferred per issue #1103.
Adds a primitive for creating a new WAITING SubTask under an existing
parent Task, routing all SubTask creation through the orchestrator
(replacing the legacy SubTaskInterface path used by the splitter).
Skips _cascade because a new WAITING child against an IN_PROGRESS
parent is a no-op under Task.recalculate_from_subtasks.
Slice 3/6 of the postcode_splitter refactor (Hestia-Homes/Model#1101).
Introduces a thin typed infrastructure layer wrapping boto3 for the AWS
side of the splitter. S3Client/SqsClient are bucket-/queue-bound byte
adapters; CsvS3Client subclasses S3Client to round-trip CSV row dicts
via the existing parse_s3_uri helper in utils/s3.py; Address2UprnQueueClient
subclasses SqsClient to publish the typed {task_id, sub_task_id, s3_uri}
fan-out body the downstream consumer expects. moto[s3,sqs] is pulled into
test.requirements.txt and the new tests/infrastructure/ suite exercises
each client against the moto backend (S3 round-trip, CSV round-trip,
SQS send + body inspection, typed publish + body inspection). pyright
--strict is clean on the new modules.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Slice 1/6 of the postcode_splitter refactor (Hestia-Homes/Model#1100).
Introduces the pure-domain foundation under domain/, with no AWS, Postgres,
or pandas. UserAddress is a frozen dataclass that sanitises its postcode in
__post_init__ via the canonical sanitise_postcode helper, and
iter_postcode_grouped_batches preserves the legacy splitter's batching
invariants (group-by-postcode in insertion order, never split a group,
oversize single-postcode groups dispatched whole, final flush). Updates
UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md so the User Address term covers both the dataclass
sense (preferred in domain code) and the raw upstream-string sense.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
100-cert probe, seed=7, sap_score window 5..99. MAE 4.29
(vs 8.41 on 2026-05-18 with the older 20..95 window — the
delta blends calculator improvements with sample-window
change, so this is logged as the post-P5 reference, not as
"P5 reduced MAE".)
P5 itself was pure trace exposure; the calculator's SAP
output should be numerically unchanged. The headline finding
from this run is primary-energy over-prediction: PE MAE
44.40 kWh/m², bias +39.66 — now the dominant signal with
SAP residuals halved. Each end-use PE contribution surfaces
on SapResult.intermediate per P5.12, so the next session
can localise the bias without re-instrumenting.
Closes the second half of P5 (HANDOVER_SYSTEMATIC_REVIEW §2.5):
- Adds test_bre_worked_examples.py — one comprehensive test that
locks every published SapResult.intermediate key against its
SAP 10.2 worksheet item number ((4) TFA, (33) fabric heat loss,
(39) HTC, (40) HLP, (73) gains, (93) mean internal temp, (98c)
space heating, (240e/247/250) costs, (252) PV credit, (256)
deflator, (257) ECF, (261-272) per-end-use CO2, (275-287)
primary energy per m²). All formulas derived independently from
the worksheet pages 131-148; passes against the synthetic
100 m² baseline.
- Explicit caveat in module docstring: BRE-published worked
examples don't exist in any of the three SAP-spec PDFs we have
(rdSAP10, SAP10.2, SAP10.3 — all greppped). The test is
spec-formula-derived, not BRE-validated. Structure stays if
BRE numbers surface later; only expected values change.
Also surfaces and documents an RdSAP10 spec drift in
PARITY_FINDINGS.md: Table 32 (page 95 of rdSAP10) gives
Energy Cost Deflator = 0.42, vs the code's 0.36 (SAP10.2 Table 12,
worksheet item (256)). Not changed in P5 — needs ADR-level
resolution on whether the calculator targets SAP10.2 (0.36) or
RdSAP10 (0.42) ratings.
P5 (SapResult.intermediate population + BRE worked-example
fixtures) is now complete on this branch.
Closes the second §11-sketch gap noted in HANDOVER_SYSTEMATIC_REVIEW
("primary energy AND CO2 per end-use"). Lifts the single co2 = total
× factor expression into five named locals (main_heating, secondary,
hot_water, pumps_fans, lighting) and exposes them on `intermediate`.
The five components sum exactly to the top-level co2_kg_per_yr — no
PV deduction in the current implementation.
P5.9 exposed the four primary-energy components as absolute kWh/yr
keys (space_heating_primary_kwh_per_yr, …). HANDOVER_SYSTEMATIC_REVIEW
§11 specifies these as `_pe_kwh_per_m2` because primary energy enters
the rating equation per floor area. Renamed to match the sketch:
- space_heating_pe_kwh_per_m2
- hot_water_pe_kwh_per_m2
- other_pe_kwh_per_m2
- pv_pe_offset_kwh_per_m2
Chain check now verifies max(0, sum − pv_offset) ≈
result.primary_energy_kwh_per_m2 (the top-level per-m² field).
Absolute kWh/yr values remain recoverable via tfa_m2 on `intermediate`.
Final P5 slice. PV credit was the missing term linking the per-end-use
fuel costs (P5.6) to the top-level total_fuel_cost_gbp: total =
max(0, sum(per-end-use) − pv_credit). With this key, every step of
the §13 cost chain — per-fuel cost → PV credit → total → ECF →
rating — is auditable from `intermediate`. P5 trace exposure is
complete.
Promotes _FLOOR_AREA_OFFSET_M2 → FLOOR_AREA_OFFSET_M2 (§13 ECF
denominator, Table 12) and _ECF_LOG_THRESHOLD → ECF_LOG_THRESHOLD
(SAP rating linear/log regime boundary at ECF = 3.5). Together with
the deflator (P5.7) they fully document the §13 rating curve in
trace mode.
Lifts the inlined primary-energy sum into four named components:
space-heating (main + secondary × space_heating PEF), hot water,
other (pumps_fans + lighting × other PEF), and the PV offset at
other PEF (Appendix M). Together with the top-level
primary_energy_kwh_per_yr they make whether the floor-at-zero
clipped visible.
Adds delivered_fuel_kwh_per_yr (sum of all five end-use kWh) and
co2_factor_kg_per_kwh (mirrors the SAP10 input). Together with the
top-level co2_kg_per_yr they make the §15 equation traceable:
co2 = delivered_fuel × factor.
Promotes `_ENERGY_COST_DEFLATOR` to `ENERGY_COST_DEFLATOR` so the
§13 Table 12 constant can be referenced in trace mode alongside the
ECF it scales. ECF mirrors the top-level field; the deflator is the
only fixed worksheet constant the SAP rating depends on.
Per-end-use £/yr costs (main heating, secondary heating, hot water,
pumps_fans, lighting) lifted from the inlined total_cost sum into named
locals and populated on `intermediate`. §12 sweep slices can now diff
each line against the spec (Table 12 unit prices, future Table 12a
fractional blending, Table 12c heat-network DLF) without re-deriving
the cost decomposition.
Behaviour-preserving — `total_fuel_cost_gbp` reconciles bit-for-bit.
136 SAP tests pass.
§9 / Table 9c step 10 output keyed by worksheet name on `intermediate`.
Mirrors the top-level `space_heating_kwh_per_yr` field so spec sweep
slices refer to the worksheet name regardless of field renames.
135 SAP tests pass.
heat_transfer_coefficient_w_per_k (HLC), heat_loss_parameter_w_per_m2k
(HLP), time_constant_h, and the two annual averages
(internal_gains_annual_avg_w, mean_internal_temp_annual_avg_c) populated
on `intermediate`. The averages let sweep slices verify monthly-loop
outputs without re-summing 12 months.
134 SAP tests pass.
infiltration_ach (the cert-derived input) and infiltration_w_per_k
(the derived HLC_V = ACH × volume × 0.33 from SAP 10.2 §4.1) populated
on `intermediate`. Diagnostic surface for the §4 / Table 4g sweep.
133 SAP tests pass.
First slice of P5 trace mode mechanical half (ADR-0010 / handover §11).
SapResult.intermediate: dict[str, float] now exposes worksheet-named
variables for per-section diffing against BRE worked examples and hand
calcs. Dimensions group lands first: tfa_m2, volume_m3, storey_count.
Subsequent slices (P5.2 heat transmission → P5.8 primary energy)
extend the same dict; field defined here so the structural change
lands once and later slices are pure additions.
131 SAP tests pass; 310 packages/domain tests pass.
ADR-0010 §2: the cert-calibration price table was bug-masking
pre-March-2025 SAP values fit against a mixture-distribution of two
spec-version regimes. P2.1 swapped the probe to SAP_10_2_SPEC_PRICES,
P2.2 migrated the golden fixtures, leaving no external consumers.
File deletion is mechanical at this point.
Also updates the cert_to_inputs() docstring at L741-L751: removes the
stale reference to CERT_CALIBRATION_PRICES, points at ADR-0010 and
the Validation Cohort filter as the parity-validation mechanism.
All 152 SAP + ml_training_data tests pass with the file gone.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ADR-0010 §10: the cert-based fixtures contained compensating errors
under cert-cal prices and are scheduled for replacement by BRE
worked-example fixtures (P5). Until P5 lands they stay as a loose
smoke test catching catastrophic regressions only.
Changes:
- Swap prices=cert_calibration_prices() → prices=SAP_10_2_SPEC_PRICES.
Last external consumer of cert_calibration_prices — P2.3 can now
delete table_12_cert_calibration.py cleanly.
- Loosen tolerance: SAP ±1 → ±5, PE ±10 → ±25. The cert-cal prices
had been numerically tuned around these specific certs, so spec
prices alone produce a -3 to +3 SAP drift across the set.
- Retire 9390-2722-3520-2105-8715 early (heat-network mid-floor
flat). It drifted to SAP residual -7 because cert-cal had absorbed
heat-network DLF + Table 12c interactions. Cert JSON remains in
fixtures/golden/ per ADR-0010 §10; a BRE worked-example covering
the heat-network path will subsume it during P5.
Remaining 6 fixtures pass at ±5 SAP under spec prices. The whole
suite retires when P5 lands.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds ADR-0010 superseding ADR-0009's spec-version target, PCDB
sequencing, and cert-calibration layer. Captures the conclusions
of a grill-with-docs session:
1. Active spec target is SAP 10.2 (14-03-2025), not SAP 10.3 — no
SAP-10.3-lodged certs exist in the corpus to validate against.
2. table_12_cert_calibration is deleted (not "re-derived at the
end"). It was pre-March-2025 spec prices fit against a mixture
distribution of two spec-version regimes, with downstream-
component bugs absorbed into the fit — not Elmhurst deviation.
3. Validation Cohort: filter the corpus to inspection_date ≥
2025-07-01 so every cert in the probe was lodged on SAP 10.2
(14-03-2025) prices. One spec, one signal.
4. PCDB integration is promoted from "Session C deferred" to
prerequisite P4 — dominates residual variance on heat pumps and
the 78% of gas-boiler certs lodging main_heating_data_source=1.
5. Trace mode (SapResult.intermediate) and BRE worked-example
fixtures replace the 7 cert-based golden fixtures, which
contained compensating errors.
6. Strict-type EpcPropertyData via codes.csv-derived canonical
enums (P6) — the in-source motivation lives at
dimensions.py:74-82 (Khalim's comment, included in this commit).
7. Worksheet-faithful structure is a sweep-time principle: each
worksheet module mirrors SAP 10.2 worksheet line numbering.
CONTEXT.md additions:
- Refined "Calculated SAP10 Performance" and "SAP10 Calculation"
to reference SAP 10.2 + ADR-0010.
- New term "SAP Spec Version" — domain-meaningful because the
same EpcPropertyData yields different sap_score under different
spec revisions.
- New term "Validation Cohort" — the version-locked sub-corpus.
HANDOVER_SYSTEMATIC_REVIEW.md is rewritten section-by-section to
reflect ADR-0010: §1 framing, §2 status pointer, new §2.5 with the
six prerequisites P1–P6 in dependency order, §3 diagnosis (cert-cal
was stale prices, not Elmhurst deviation), §4 scope (PCDB IN,
SAP 10.3 stays OUT), §5 approach (worksheet-faithful principle as
§5.5), §7 tension dissolved, §7b findings re-framed, §8 dead-ends
re-classified as conditional, §9 cohort filter, §10 fixture
strategy, §11 trace mode as prerequisite, §12 prereqs-first,
§13 Phase 0/Phase 1 workflow, §14 ADR-0010 reference, §15 final
note.
P2.1 (commit ac1aa56a) already lands the first ADR-0010 slice
(probe swap to spec prices).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ADR-0010 P2: cert-calibration layer is deleted, the probe uses
SAP_10_2_SPEC_PRICES (already defined in cert_to_inputs.py). Extracts
a pure predict_sap_for_cert(cert_document, *, prices) -> int helper
out of main()'s inline pipeline so the spec-prices path is unit-
testable in isolation; the helper is also reusable for P3's cohort-
filtered probe variant.
The pinned regression value (SAP=67 for cert 6035-7729 under spec
prices, vs the cert's lodged SAP of 73 under cert-cal prices) lives
in services/ml_training_data/tests/unit/test_sap_parity_probe.py.
It will drift as P4 (PCDB) and the section sweep land their fixes;
that's expected.
cert_calibration_prices is still imported by test_golden_fixtures.py
and the table_12_cert_calibration module is intact. P2.2/P2.3 retire
those.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
§7b "Outstanding findings to pick up during the systematic pass"
collects spec-correct fixes that were reverted because they regressed
SAP MAE against the corpus — but the spec basis is unambiguous and
they WILL be the right answer once cert-calibration is re-derived.
Treat as TODOs, not dead-ends. Documents:
Finding 1 — HW cylinder zero-loss for combi (PE MAE -6.64 measured)
Finding 2 — Standing charges Table 12 note (a)
Finding 3 — Cat=10 room-heater Table 12a fractional blending
Finding 4 — Lighting Appendix L proper (L1-L12 cascade)
Finding 5 — Internal-gains Table 5 water-heating + losses rows
Finding 6 — Storage-loss-factor table values 3× off spec
Finding 7 — Heat-pump fallback (needs PCDB)
Finding 8 — Smaller gaps carried forward
Each documents the spec section/page reference, the current code
bug, empirical impact where measured, and when to pick up during the
section-by-section sweep.
PCDB section strengthened from "deferred to Session C" to an explicit
roadmap: data source URL, lookup key (main_heating_index_number),
fields needed, recommended sequencing (after spec sweep so cert-cal
is re-derivable), and why-not-now (cert-cal currently masks PCDB gaps).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The slice-by-slice "fix the biggest residual" approach has hit a
ceiling at SAP MAE ~4.6 because the cert-calibration prices absorb
multiple structural deviations from spec. Any spec-correct fix in one
component breaks the calibration for others. Three failed slices this
session (standing charges, cat=10 routing, combi zero-loss) made the
pattern unambiguous.
Pivot: systematic section-by-section spec verification. Read the
RdSAP 10 + SAP 10.2 spec in order, check each table / formula /
footnote against the corresponding code, fix gaps one at a time.
Build the spec-correct engine first; re-derive cert-cal calibration
once at the end as a thin Elmhurst-compatibility layer.
Handover doc covers:
- Critical framing (deterministic, not assessor judgement)
- Current state (SAP MAE 4.61, PE MAE 43.32 at f4a8d2a0)
- Why the slice-by-slice approach won't converge
- Scope decisions (RdSAP 10 + SAP 10.2 only; park full-SAP + PCDB)
- Section-to-code mapping
- Known dead-ends to skip
- Cert-calibration vs spec-correctness tension and how to resolve it
- The 7 golden fixtures and their compensating-error caveats
- Trace mode recommendation (ADR-0009's `intermediate` field)
- Specific §1-3 starting tasks
- Workflow recap
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Pins 7 certs from a 1000-cert random sample that satisfy:
|SAP rounded-int residual| ≤ 1
|PE residual| ≤ 10 kWh/m²
main_heating_category != 4 OR main_heating_data_source != 1
(non-PCDB-heat-pump — PCDB lookup is deferred)
Cert mix: 6 cat=2 gas/oil boilers (3 PCDB, 3 Table 4b) + 1 cat=6 heat
network. Age bands A, C, D (×3), F, J, L. TFAs 75-526. Mix of
detached / semi-detached / mid-terrace / mid-floor flat. The cleanest
PE match in the set (cert 7536-3827) has PE residual -0.29 kWh/m².
Purpose: regression anchor. Future slices that improve aggregate MAE
silently break individual certs unless caught here. Each cert's
expected residual is recorded in `_EXPECTATIONS` so the diff is
human-inspectable when a regression fires.
The set is acknowledged to contain compensating-errors cases: some
certs match SAP within ±1 because the cert-calibration prices absorb
multiple structural deviations from spec. Hand-trace of 7536-3827
showed PE matched (-0.29) but cost was £143 (12%) under cert's implied
cost — a multi-factor gap (price calibration + missing gas standing
charge + lighting over-prediction) that cancels back into SAP ±1. We
accept this with the tolerance choice: tightening to PE ±5 in our
sample would have yielded zero fixtures.
Tolerance can tighten over the session as we close the PE bias
(currently +38 kWh/m² systematic).
All 301 domain tests pass; no behaviour changed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Heat-network certs (cat=6) were under-predicted in cost — SAP bias
+6.31 across 13 sample certs, PE bias -15.6 (we under-predicted PE).
Root cause: missing distribution-loss-factor application.
SAP 10.2 spec references:
- Table 12 note (k): "Cost is per unit of heat generated (i.e.
before distribution losses); emission and primary factors are per
unit of fuel used by the heat generator."
- §C3.1: "Where a heat network is listed in the PCDB, the DLF is
already factored into the cost, CO2 and PE factors recorded
therein, so a DLF of 1 should be entered in worksheet (306) to
avoid double counting." (Implication: non-PCDB networks MUST
apply DLF.)
- Table 12c (p. 193): DLF by age band, 1.20 (A pre-1900) →
1.50 (K+ 2007+).
- RdSAP 10 §10.11 Table 29 cross-references Table 12c.
Mechanism: setting main_heating_efficiency = 1/DLF (and water_eff
when HW inherits from main via codes 901/902/914) makes the
calculator's main_fuel_kwh = q_useful × DLF = q_generated, which
multiplied by the per-kWh-generated unit price gives the cost the
spec mandates.
Affects:
- Heat-network main heating (sap_main_heating_code in 301-304 OR
main_heating_category == 6)
- HW from main on such certs (water_heating_code in 901/902/914)
Trade-off: CO2/PE for heat-network certs will under-predict ~20%
versus the spec's "fuel-burned × per-fuel-factor" formula, because
our architecture uses one main_fuel_kwh value for cost AND CO2/PE.
For SAP-rating purposes (the priority) this is acceptable; the PE
bias actually moves in the right direction here (cat=6 PE bias
-15.6 → -5.6) because the under-counting partially cancels a
pre-existing larger under-count.
Parity probe at 300 certs, seed=7:
SAP MAE 4.69 → 4.61 (-0.08)
SAP bias 0.98 → 0.87 (-0.11)
PE MAE 43.32 → 43.11 (-0.21)
cat=6 PE bias -15.6 → -5.6 (+10.0, correct direction)
cat=6 PE MAE 40.3 → 35.8 (-4.5)
cat=6 our_pe 158.5 → 225.0 (cert 230.6 — converged)
Cumulative across S-B23 → S-B31:
SAP MAE 5.34 → 4.61 (-0.73)
PE MAE 57.28 → 43.11 (-14.17)
PE bias 51.56 → 38.64 (-12.92)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
An attempted slice (S-B30, not committed) hypothesised that
`main_heating_fraction=1` on the cert meant "no secondary heating" and
overrode Table 11's 10% default. Probe at 300 certs penalised it:
SAP MAE 4.69 → 4.85, SAP bias 0.98 → 1.61. The hypothesis was wrong
and I should have read the spec before coding.
SAP 10.2 Appendix A1 (p. 43) defines `main_heating_fraction` as the
allocation between TWO main heating systems when both exist; not as
the main-vs-secondary fraction. 99% of corpus certs have =1, meaning
"single main, 100% allocation".
SAP 10.2 Appendix A4(d) (p. 45) is explicit: "If any fixed secondary
heater has been identified, the calculation proceeds with the
identified secondary heater" and "Table 11 gives the fraction of the
heating that is assumed to be supplied by the secondary system" —
no override based on main_heating_fraction.
Adds:
- Regression test pinning the spec behaviour
(test_main_heating_fraction_does_not_override_table11_secondary_default)
- Regression test for the already-spec-aligned fallback path
- _secondary_fraction docstring explaining why main_heating_fraction
is NOT consulted (with reference to the failed attempt)
- secondary_heating_type kwarg on make_sap_heating (test-only, was
missing — needed to construct the regression fixture)
Probe at 300 certs unchanged from prior baseline:
SAP MAE 4.69, bias 0.98
PE MAE 43.32, bias 37.69
The hand-trace finding that cert 9036-0827 over-predicts cost remains
real, but the secondary-heating fraction is per-spec. The residual
~£33 gap on that cert is most likely missing PCDB efficiency lookup
(cert has main_heating_data_source=1 and index_number=10241 — PCDB
data — and we fall back to category-default 0.80 vs typical PCDB-
listed condensing-boiler 0.90+). Deferred to Session C per ADR-0009.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Parallel of S-B24 (walls) for the other envelope elements. Full-SAP
assessments lodge a measured/calculated U-value directly in the
description ("Average thermal transmittance X W/m²K") for floors
(~1 391 corpus certs) and roofs (~1 140 certs). Per spec:
- §5.11 (roofs) opening clause defers to assessor's value when
present
- §5.12 (floors): "Unless provided by the assessor the floor
U-value is calculated according to BS EN ISO 13370"
Both u_floor and u_roof now invoke `_measured_u_from_description`
first; if it parses a value, they return it directly and skip the
cascade. No range cap (consistent with S-B24 design — calculator
mirrors what the assessor lodged).
Parity probe at 300 certs, seed=7: headlines unchanged (same parquet
sampling gap as S-B24 — full-SAP certs filtered out upstream). Slice
correctness proved by:
- 1 unit test for u_floor measured-U parse
- 1 unit test for u_roof measured-U parse
- existing 287 tests passing, no regressions
A bulk-zip-based probe to measure the corpus-wide impact remains the
needed tooling investment (see S-B24 commit message).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
