End-to-end pin at the generator seam (recommend_solar) — passed on first
run since option construction is unchanged by design (ADR-0058).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Pins that the unchanged cap regime (min of 0.7×Google and the ADR-0038
budget) flows into ADR-0058 derivation — no red phase; the tracer
implementation passed the already-min'd cap through.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Pins the ADR-0058 install floor delivered with the tracer slice (rung_max
< 2 returns empty) — no red phase.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Pins behavior delivered with the tracer slice (derivation starts from the
north-dropped remainder) — no red phase; the mutation is discriminating
(a kept north panel would win fill-by-generation and shift the yields).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sizing selects the aroTHERM plus rung nearest PSR ~0.8 (0.8 x design heat
loss) — the Appendix-N efficiency peak, reproducing the pump a real
installer fits — rather than the MCS PSR>=1.0 capacity target, which
oversizes. Validated against the relodged Elmhurst ASHP cert (delta 0
held at the 5 kW Vaillant); the two self-snapshot pins re-pin to their
correctly-sized larger pumps, and the orchestrator/harness thread the
calculator's design heat loss so production sizes to the dwelling. Manual
SapResult test stubs carry the new design_heat_loss_kw field.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
_ashp_option now selects the aroTHERM plus PCDB record matching the
threaded design heat loss (floor-area proxy fallback), so the overlay's
efficiency anchor is sized to the dwelling instead of a fixed 5 kW unit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The high-heat-retention storage-heater (HHRSH) recommendation was computed
as LOWERING SAP and wrongly rejected by the Optimiser, leaving electric-
room-heater flats/maisonettes stuck at band E with no sensible plan.
Root cause: `_HHR_STORAGE_OVERLAY` sets `sap_main_heating_code=409` (HHR
storage) + `meter_type="Dual"` but left `main_heating_category` at the
pre-existing value (10 = electric room heaters). The SAP 10.2 Table 12a
space-heating high-rate-fraction resolver classifies by category, so it
misread the off-peak storage heating as direct-acting electric (1.00
high-rate) and priced 100% at the 7-hour peak rate (15.29p) instead of the
storage off-peak split (0.00, ~5.5p).
Verified against accredited Elmhurst RdSAP-10 on UPRN 100020942571
(8 Booth Close, SE28 8BW): engine HHRSH SAP 48 (peak-priced, cost £1087)
vs Elmhurst 71 (cost ~£611); with the fix the engine gives 73 / £576.
Two-part fix (defence in depth, so no future overlay/mapper can
reintroduce it):
- `_HHR_STORAGE_OVERLAY` now sets `main_heating_category=7`, keeping the
overlaid EPC internally consistent.
- `_table_12a_system_for_main` now classifies electric storage heaters by
their Table 4a SAP code (401-409) as well as `category==7`, checked
before the room-heater branch, so a specific storage code is
authoritative over a stale/inconsistent category.
Tests: new regression `test_storage_heater_classified_by_sap_code_over_stale_category`;
updated the HHRSH overlay pin. Full accuracy corpus still passes (no regressions).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Gov-API certs that lodge a gas boiler as main_heating_category=2 + a PCDB
main_heating_index_number but omit sap_main_heating_code were carried with
a null code, so the heating generators (which gated on sap_main_heating_code
alone) never evaluated them for a boiler upgrade or a system tune-up — they
silently got nothing (£0 works, plateau at D). The SAP calculator already
handles this shape (cert_to_inputs._is_wet_boiler_main), so the calculator
modelled these as wet boilers while the recommenders ignored them.
Mirror the calculator's classification in the generator:
- _is_wet_boiler / _is_electric_boiler fall back, when no SAP code is
lodged, to a PCDB Table 105 boiler index or main_heating_category in
{1,2} (heat pumps excluded); electric boilers stay excluded by the code
range when lodged, else by an electricity main fuel.
- _already_condensing reads the boiler's declared PCDB winter efficiency
when there is no Table 4b code, so a modern condensing boiler lodged this
way still isn't offered a pointless like-for-like swap (gets a tune-up).
Verified read-only on portfolio 814 / scenario 1271: pids 742304, 742306,
742322, 742325, 742336 now get a gas_boiler_upgrade (two cross D->C on the
boiler alone) where they had £0 works; predicted properties whose heating
donor is a PCDB-shape boiler (e.g. 742095/742102/742105) also recover a
tune-up. Fixes the A#2 slice of #1388 (and unblocks 742302/742367).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Gate PV generation/credit in cert_to_inputs on gov-API pv_connection:
credit only when ==2 ('connected'); ==1 ('present but not connected to the
dwelling's meter') contributes zero to the dwelling's cost/CO2/PE per
RdSAP 10 §11.1 / SAP 10.2 Appendix M. Non-int (None / site-notes str) keeps
the credit-if-array behaviour, so the Elmhurst/Summary + synthetic paths are
unchanged (no regression).
Corpus: all 5 pv_connection=1 PV certs move inside ±0.5 (e.g. 100051118081
+6.5→+0.5); MAE 0.760→0.740, within-0.5 73.8→74.3%, no regression
(pv_connection=2 certs keep their credit).
Also corrects a now-load-bearing latent bug: the solar-recommendation
overlay tagged recommended arrays pv_connection=1 ('not connected') — which
the new gate would zero. A new install connects to the dwelling's meter, so
it must be 2; pinned by the overlay test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three corrections found by re-running property 742003 end-to-end:
- roofSegmentStats are POSITIONAL — real responses omit the segmentIndex field
the fixture happened to carry; key the centre/area lookup by array position.
- Base the cap on ground_floor_area (the footprint the roof covers), not the
greatest per-storey area; roof_area is the fallback.
- Clamp the basis by total_floor_area: predicted EPCs borrow the structural
template's geometry (742003: a 118.62 m² MAIN ground floor) decoupled from
the predicted 55 m² (ADR-0029), so without the clamp the cap reads the
template's larger footprint.
Result: 742003 plan A/92.4 (16 kWp) -> C/74.4 (6.4 kWp). 29 solar tests +
orchestration threading + products green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
select_conservative_configs must accept the dwelling's roof area and cap panels
to its usable roof (ADR-0038) — bounding a 55m² dwelling to ~16 panels under
Google footprint conflation, while staying a no-op on correctly-matched homes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Dwelling-Roof Cap (ADR-0038) sizes by usable roof area and ranks segments
by distance from the dwelling, so the projection must carry each panel's
footprint and each segment's centre + area (from roofSegmentStats).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2 modelling_e2e properties failed with KeyError: 'maxArrayPanelsCount'.
Google returns a `solarPotential` block with no array-level sizing fields
(`maxArrayPanelsCount` / `panelCapacityWatts`) for buildings with no usable
solar estimate. `SolarPotential.from_building_insights` hard-indexed those keys
and crashed the whole property.
Fix: the projection now returns Optional and yields None when those fields are
absent — the established "no solar potential" outcome (the orchestrator and
recommendation path already type it Optional and skip solar on None). Existing
callers (`_solar_potential_for`, harness) already assign to Optional.
Regression test + `assert is not None` narrowing on the valid-fixture tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fitting sealed glazing units changes two things beyond the pane's U/g
that the cascade reads, which the overlay didn't model — leaving the
double/secondary before→after pins ~0.7 SAP short (xfail):
1. Draught-proofing (RdSAP 10 §8.1). Sealed units draught-proof the panes
they replace, re-lodging the dwelling-level `percent_draughtproofed`
(cert 001431: 84 → 100). The §2 cascade reads that dwelling-level
value, so the overlay now carries it. `_recompute_percent_draughtproofed`
anchors on the lodged before-% — `after = round((round(before%/100 × N)
+ flips) / N × 100)`, N = openable windows (vertical + roof) + doors,
flips = upgraded panes that were not draught-proofed — so it's robust
to incomplete window extraction (unchanged openings are already in the
aggregate). ~0.3 SAP.
2. Frame factor (§6 solar gains). A replacement unit re-lodges its own
FF=0.70, overriding the pane it replaced — the two "single glazing,
known data" panes lodge FF 1.00 / 0.50 (one is 6.6 m²), so leaving them
unchanged understated solar gains by ~+150 kWh space heating. `WindowOverlay`
now carries `frame_factor`, written flat onto the window. ~0.4 SAP.
Wiring: `EpcSimulation.percent_draughtproofed` + `WindowOverlay.frame_factor`
new fields; `apply_simulations` / `_fold_window` write them; the glazing
generator computes both from the upgraded set and cert 001431's after.
Un-xfails `test_{double,secondary}_glazing_overlay_reproduces_the_relodged_after`
— both now pin SAP/CO2/PE to the relodged after within tolerance. Updates
the two `test_glazing_recommendation` overlay expectations for the new
`frame_factor`. 96 modelling tests pass; zero new pyright errors.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A Landlord Override's building_part is a positional index (0=main, 1=extension
1…, ADR-0004), but the gov-API EPC can label that slot differently (e.g. lodge
the 2nd part as 'other', not 'extension_1'). The previous fix skipped such
orphaned overrides, silently discarding the landlord's correction. Now the
override falls back onto the EPC's part at that position (via _resolve_part), so
the correction lands; only a position the EPC models no part at is skipped
(no geometry to model a wholly-absent part). Replaces the skip-only behaviour.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The SAP/EI rating is computed on UK-average weather (Appendix U Tables
U1-U3 region 0) so ratings are nationally comparable, but Appendix U
paragraph 1 (PDF p.124) requires that "other calculations (such as for
energy use and costs on EPCs) are done using local weather. Weather data
for each postcode district are taken from the PCDB". `Sap10Calculator.
calculate` ran ONE cascade (UK-average) and fed it to SAP, CO2 AND primary
energy, so every cert's EPC-displayed CO2/PE were computed on the wrong
climate. Because most of England is warmer than the UK-average, this
systematically OVER-counted heating demand on the emissions/PE outputs.
The two cascades (`cert_to_inputs` rating, `cert_to_demand_inputs`
postcode) already existed; this wires the demand cascade into the
production entry point and grafts its CO2/PE onto the rating result (SAP
unchanged). The corpus gauge's longstanding +5% CO2/PE over-estimate was
mostly this climate bug, NOT (as previously diagnosed) per-cert mapper
fidelity:
CO2 MAE 0.26 -> 0.12 t/yr (bias +0.18 -> +0.04)
PE MAE 13.6 -> 3.8 kWh/m2 (bias +9.0 -> +0.24)
SAP within-0.5 = 69.7% (rating cascade, unchanged)
Worksheet-validated to 1e-4 on simulated case 45 (heat-pump ground-floor
flat, postcode W6): the P960 prints the current dwelling twice — Block 1
on UK-average weather (SAP 60.5318, CO2 692.13) and Block 2 on postcode
weather (CO2 626.78, PE 6581.59). Both reproduce exactly. Added a tracked
case-45 Summary fixture + two-cascade cascade pin as a permanent guard,
and ratcheted the corpus CO2/PE ceilings to 0.13 / 4.2. The e2e Elmhurst
suite (Block-1 line refs) now pins the rating cascade directly; the two
Vaillant overlay snapshots refreshed to demand-cascade CO2/PE.
pyright not installed in this codespace (strict gate not run locally);
change is type-trivial (dataclasses.replace over SapResult).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The measures a run considers should come from the Scenario, not a CLI flag.
The live scenario table persists exclusions only (no inclusions column), as a
Postgres text-array of exact MeasureType values.
- Scenario gains `exclusions: frozenset[MeasureType]` + `considered_measures()`
(all measures minus the excluded ones, or None when none are excluded).
- ScenarioModel.to_domain parses the `{a,b,c}` exclusions array into
MeasureTypes, raising on a token that is not an exact MeasureType value
(no high-level category expansion), per the strict-enum convention.
- ModellingOrchestrator._plan_for derives the allowlist from the Scenario's
exclusions, combined (intersection) with any explicit considered_measures
override via the new `combine_considered_measures`.
- run_modelling_e2e sources the allowlist from the Scenario; --measures /
--exclude-measures become optional overlays (e.g. the technical
secondary_heating_removal exclusion the catalogue cannot yet stock).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The ASHP bundle is priced from the rate sheet (ADR-0025); the catalogue
row is read only for its material id, which is nullable end-to-end. The
live `material` catalogue has no `air_source_heat_pump` row, so
`products.get` raised `ValueError: no active product` and aborted every
ASHP-eligible property.
Add `ProductNotFound(ValueError)` + a concrete `ProductRepository
.get_optional`, raise the typed error from both repos, and have
`_ashp_option` look the row up optionally — a missing row now yields an
ASHP Option with `material_id=None` rather than crashing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The HHR-storage HeatingOverlay (ADR-0024) added an off-peak electric
immersion cylinder but never set `immersion_heating_type`, so the overlaid
cert left it None. The calculator then could not resolve `immersion_single`
for the SAP 10.2 Table 13 HW high-rate split and billed hot water 100% at
the off-peak low rate — £127.41 vs the relodged after-cert's £169.39,
overstating the overlay's SAP by +1.26 (CO2/PE matched, isolating it to the
HW cost path).
Add `immersion_heating_type` to HeatingOverlay, route it through
`_fold_heating` (it lives on `sap_heating`), and set it to 1 (single
off-peak immersion) on the HHR overlay to match the relodged reference.
Closes both `test_hhr_storage_overlay_reproduces_the_relodged_after_*`
cascade pins (electric-storage and no-system befores share the after).
Pre-existing failure (present before this branch's recent commits), outside
the handover regression gate. Full modelling suite 220 pass, pyright net-
zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two cascade tests on the worksheet-pinned 001431 build_epc() (the user's
before/after Summary PDFs trip the documented 001431 window-extraction bug, so
the repo's sanctioned 001431 baseline is used instead):
- electric-storage main (code 402) + secondary 691: removal reproduces the
secondary-removed cert at delta 0 — RdSAP §A.2.2 re-forces a default secondary,
matching the user's F35→F35 example;
- gas combi main (code 104) + secondary 691: removal strictly raises SAP
(74.22→77.61) — the Table 11 fraction reallocates to the cheaper main.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
recommend_secondary_heating_removal offers one standalone Option that clears the
lodged secondary system. Eligibility is purely physical (offer iff
sap_heating.secondary_heating_type is set) — no effectiveness gate, since a
lodged secondary is a fixed emitter per RdSAP (portables are ignored), and the
electric-storage §A.2.2 no-op is the Optimiser's call (ADR-0028 decisions 1-2).
Priced at a flat per-dwelling decommission cost, not room-scaled.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The first overlay surface that sets fields to *absent* rather than to a
target state: _fold_secondary_heating clears sap_heating.secondary_heating_type
+ secondary_fuel_type, so the calculator's Table 11 secondary-fraction split
(SAP 10.2 §9a) routes 100% of space heating to the main. On an electric-storage
main RdSAP §A.2.2 re-forces a default secondary, making removal a no-op there —
left to the Optimiser to de-select (ADR-0028 decisions 2-3).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Don't offer a like-for-like gas boiler swap to a dwelling whose existing gas
boiler is already at least as efficient as the new condensing boiler (SAP 10.2
Table 4b codes 102/104 = 84% winter) — it gains nothing, and the dwelling gets
the tune-up (cylinder + controls) instead. `_already_condensing` compares the
existing code's Table 4b winter efficiency to 84%; a non-Table-4b code (solid
fuel) has no comparable efficiency and is never treated as already-condensing.
The gate is GAS-ONLY: a non-gas boiler → gas is a fuel switch whose value (cost
/ carbon) is not captured by winter efficiency, so oil/LPG/coal → gas is never
suppressed on efficiency grounds (only gated on the mains-gas connection).
This correctly demotes the gas-with-cylinder example (cert lodges code 114
"Regular, condensing", 84% winter) to a tune-up case — confirming that 114→102
is ~0 boiler-efficiency gain in both our calc and Elmhurst (both Table 4b 84%);
Elmhurst's uplift there came from the cylinder + flue, not the boiler. The
boiler-with-cylinder overlay stays validated by the lpg pin (code 115, non-
condensing + cylinder) and by recasting the 114 fixtures' code to a pre-1998
non-condensing boiler (110) in the boiler tests — the overlay overwrites the
code to 102 regardless, so only eligibility changes, not the delta-0 result.
New tests: an already-condensing gas boiler yields no boiler upgrade (but a
tune-up); an oil condensing boiler is not gated (the fuel switch survives).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
