Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
024a01b128 The Dwelling-Roof Cap bounds Sub-Ladder rungs too 🟩
Pins that the unchanged cap regime (min of 0.7×Google and the ADR-0038
budget) flows into ADR-0058 derivation — no red phase; the tracer
implementation passed the already-min'd cap through.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-07 22:08:28 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
1756976d7e A roof capped below two panels is still offered no PV 🟩
Pins the ADR-0058 install floor delivered with the tracer slice (rung_max
< 2 returns empty) — no red phase.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-07 22:07:39 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
5a382948d5 Sub-Ladder rungs never take from north planes 🟩
Pins behavior delivered with the tracer slice (derivation starts from the
north-dropped remainder) — no red phase; the mutation is discriminating
(a kept north panel would win fill-by-generation and shift the yields).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-07 22:07:18 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
0b33f7dc65 Sub-Ladder rungs fill from the highest-yield segment first 🟥
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-07 22:06:10 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
79d7743bb1 A small roof derives Sub-Ladder rungs below Google's smallest config 🟥
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-07 22:03:43 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
0a2ed67e94 Harden Dwelling-Roof Cap on real data: positional segments, ground-floor basis 🟩
Three corrections found by re-running property 742003 end-to-end:
- roofSegmentStats are POSITIONAL — real responses omit the segmentIndex field
  the fixture happened to carry; key the centre/area lookup by array position.
- Base the cap on ground_floor_area (the footprint the roof covers), not the
  greatest per-storey area; roof_area is the fallback.
- Clamp the basis by total_floor_area: predicted EPCs borrow the structural
  template's geometry (742003: a 118.62 m² MAIN ground floor) decoupled from
  the predicted 55 m² (ADR-0029), so without the clamp the cap reads the
  template's larger footprint.

Result: 742003 plan A/92.4 (16 kWp) -> C/74.4 (6.4 kWp). 29 solar tests +
orchestration threading + products green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-26 12:24:52 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
904c205e3a Dwelling-Roof Cap bounds the PV array to the dwelling's own roof 🟥
select_conservative_configs must accept the dwelling's roof area and cap panels
to its usable roof (ADR-0038) — bounding a 55m² dwelling to ~16 panels under
Google footprint conflation, while staying a no-op on correctly-matched homes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-26 12:15:28 +00:00
Jun-te Kim
79f89d872e Treat solar block without array sizing as no-solar (fix KeyError)
2 modelling_e2e properties failed with KeyError: 'maxArrayPanelsCount'.

Google returns a `solarPotential` block with no array-level sizing fields
(`maxArrayPanelsCount` / `panelCapacityWatts`) for buildings with no usable
solar estimate. `SolarPotential.from_building_insights` hard-indexed those keys
and crashed the whole property.

Fix: the projection now returns Optional and yields None when those fields are
absent — the established "no solar potential" outcome (the orchestrator and
recommendation path already type it Optional and skip solar on None). Existing
callers (`_solar_potential_for`, harness) already assign to Optional.

Regression test + `assert is not None` narrowing on the valid-fixture tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-24 10:22:06 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
c03f4ff123 feat(modelling): conservative PV config selection (5-config spread)
Slice 4 of the Solar PV Recommendation Generator (ADR-0026).
`select_conservative_configs` turns Google's full solarPanelConfigs ladder
into up to five competing array configs for the Optimiser: drop north-facing
planes (within 30° of due north, wrap-aware), cap usable panels at ~70% of
maxArrayPanelsCount (imagery misses obstructions; MCS edge setback), collapse
rungs that trim to the same usable size keeping the higher-generation layout,
then sample five spanning min→max by expected generation. Returns () when
nothing usable remains.

Real London example → 5 rungs at 4/12/19/26/34 panels (all ≤34.3 = 70% of
49); synthetic cases pin the north-drop and the 70% cap.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-08 10:02:15 +00:00