Review feedback (#1481): the address batcher and the Modelling Run batcher
implemented the same greedy packing; the core moves to
utilities/grouped_batching.py and both become thin wrappers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The heat-network mirror of keep_existing_off_peak_meter: the override's
2313 default applies only when the replaced system's control is
cross-family (stale); an observed community control survives.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per-axis choice (decided with Khalim): the kit axis concedes to the
evidence (community schemes skew modern; lodged community certs are
overwhelmingly thermostatted, none lodge 2301), the charging axis stays
flat-rate — usage-linked billing is scheme paperwork an override
cannot see.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
421 slab -> Other storage heaters (0.00); 422/423 integrated -> 0.20;
424/425 screed/timber -> 0.90/0.50 — per the Grid 1 row labels that name
the codes (PDF p.184). Closes the None all-low-rate fallback that
over-credited 7-hour-metered underfloor dwellings.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ADR-0048's intended end-state (#1444 Part C): every mapped archetype now
resolves confident companions, so an incomplete set can only mean a new
archetype landed without choosing them — fail loudly at overlay time.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The last real archetype on the companion-gap log; the log test now
simulates a future incomplete archetype (warm-air heat pump, Group 5
control deliberately unmapped).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
_u_brick_thin_wall_age_a_to_e's `<= 280` check put an uninsulated solid-
brick wall of exactly 280mm in the "200 to 280mm -> 1.7" row; RdSAP 10
§5.7 Table 13 (spec PDF p.41) shares 280 as an unlabelled edge between
that row and "280 to 420mm -> 1.4", so the table text alone doesn't say
which row owns it.
Found by building cert 100031768368 (280mm exactly, band C) in Elmhurst
and comparing every worksheet line to the calculator: volume/ACH/floor/
doors matched exactly, but the wall didn't (1.70 vs Elmhurst's 1.40)
despite an identical input crosswalk. Initially reverted a first attempt
at this fix when it appeared to regress an already-pinned cert
(217091901, band A, also nominally 280mm, previously "confirmed" at
U=1.70) — but that cert's build script never actually set a wall
thickness field, so its shared Elmhurst assessment had silently
inherited a stale 260mm from an earlier build. Fixed that build script
and rebuilt with the correct 280mm entry: Elmhurst's worksheet now also
gives U=1.40, matching 100031768368 and confirming the fix rather than
contradicting it.
Both certs move to (near-)exact lodged matches: 100031768368 59.12 ->
61.21 (lodged 61, within 0.5); 217091901 60.82 -> 61.59 (lodged 62,
exact). Corpus gauge 77.8% -> 78.6% within-0.5, MAE 0.636 -> 0.627 (14
corpus certs lodge exactly 280mm solid brick). TDD'd, 46 pins + full
suite green (2310 passed).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sizing selects the aroTHERM plus rung nearest PSR ~0.8 (0.8 x design heat
loss) — the Appendix-N efficiency peak, reproducing the pump a real
installer fits — rather than the MCS PSR>=1.0 capacity target, which
oversizes. Validated against the relodged Elmhurst ASHP cert (delta 0
held at the 5 kW Vaillant); the two self-snapshot pins re-pin to their
correctly-sized larger pumps, and the orchestrator/harness thread the
calculator's design heat loss so production sizes to the dwelling. Manual
SapResult test stubs carry the new design_heat_loss_kw field.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
_ashp_option threads its sized design heat loss into ashp_cost_inputs so
the cost band and the pump's efficiency record share one figure — a leaky
dwelling's larger pump is priced on the matching band.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
_ashp_option now selects the aroTHERM plus PCDB record matching the
threaded design heat loss (floor-area proxy fallback), so the overlay's
efficiency anchor is sized to the dwelling instead of a fixed 5 kW unit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
design_heat_loss_kw = annual-average HLC x 24.2 K (SAP design temperature
difference) / 1000, the quantity Appendix N's PSR divides a heat pump's
rated output by — surfaced so the ASHP recommendation can size the pump.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The sizing ladder (Vaillant aroTHERM plus 3.5-12 kW PCDB records) picks
the smallest rung whose rated output meets the design heat loss, so SAP
10.2 Appendix N reads the heat-pump efficiency near its PSR peak instead
of collapsing on an undersized fixed unit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
