Commit graph

14 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
305bffd284 refactor(ara): rename FirstRunPipeline → AraFirstRunPipeline (PR #1139 review)
Aligns the composition with its entry point (the `ara_first_run` lambda +
`AraFirstRunTriggerBody`): clearer what the file does.

- orchestration/first_run_pipeline.py → ara_first_run_pipeline.py
- FirstRunPipeline → AraFirstRunPipeline; FirstRunCommand → AraFirstRunCommand
- test files renamed to match

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-01 15:00:33 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
c3691d9af2 refactor(property-baseline): rename baseline → property_baseline aggregate (PR #1139 review)
Wholesale rename of the Baseline aggregate to PropertyBaseline for clarity /
to disambiguate from baselines that appear elsewhere in Modelling. Scoped to
this aggregate only — the distinct Rebaselining term (rebaseline_reason,
StubRebaseliner, RebaselineNotImplemented) is deliberately untouched.

- domain/baseline → domain/property_baseline; BaselinePerformance →
  PropertyBaselinePerformance.
- repositories/baseline → repositories/property_baseline; BaselineRepository
  / BaselinePostgresRepository → PropertyBaseline*.
- orchestration/baseline_orchestrator.py → property_baseline_orchestrator.py;
  BaselineOrchestrator → PropertyBaselineOrchestrator. BaselineStage →
  PropertyBaselineStage.
- infrastructure/postgres: baseline_performance_table.py →
  property_baseline_performance_table.py; table `baseline_performance` →
  `property_baseline_performance`; Model renamed.
- UnitOfWork attribute `.baseline` → `.property_baseline`.
- Docs: ADR-0004 references + migration doc (renamed to
  property-baseline-performance-table.md) updated.

CONTEXT.md glossary term ("Baseline Performance") left as-is pending a
ubiquitous-language call (raised on the PR). 123 tests pass; pyright strict
clean (only the unrelated pre-existing moto import errors remain).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-01 14:54:59 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
8685f8ba3a perf(repos): bulk get_many / get_for_properties — batch reads, not N round-trips (#1138)
Final slice of ADR-0012: collapse the per-property read round-trips a batch
made (Baseline hydrated ~8 queries x 30 properties one at a time) into a
handful of per-table IN queries.

- EpcPostgresRepository: extracted a shared `_compose(rows)` from `get` (the
  windows + floor-dim fetches are now passed in, not fetched inline), so both
  `get` and the new `get_for_properties(property_ids)` build EpcPropertyData
  from pre-fetched rows. `get_for_properties` fetches each child table once
  (`WHERE epc_property_id IN ...`), groups in memory, and composes — load-whole
  per ADR-0002.
- PropertyRepository.get_many(property_ids) -> Properties: one query for the
  property rows + one bulk EPC hydration, composed in input order.
- BaselineOrchestrator / IngestionOrchestrator read the batch via get_many
  instead of N x get.
- Ports + fakes gain the bulk methods.

The #1129 round-trip fidelity test stays green (the compose extraction is
behaviour-preserving). New tests: bulk hydration correctness + round-trips are
constant w.r.t. batch size (one-per-table, proven by query count). 123 pass;
pyright strict clean; AAA.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-31 10:33:24 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
48a488d1e9 refactor(orchestration): wire stages onto the UnitOfWork; per-stage commit (#1138)
Replaces the handler's whole-pipeline Session (one transaction across all
three stages, connection pinned during Ingestion's external IO) with a
Unit-of-Work per stage (ADR-0012, added here). Each stage runs its batch in
one unit and commits once; any property raising aborts the batch and the
subtask fails noisily.

- BaselineOrchestrator(unit_of_work, rebaseliner): one unit for the batch,
  commit once. Raise on a pre-SAP10 property leaves the unit uncommitted.
- IngestionOrchestrator(unit_of_work, epc_fetcher, geospatial_repo,
  solar_fetcher): fetch/write split — phase 1 fetches the whole batch (EPC /
  coords / solar) with NO unit open; phase 2 writes in one unit and commits.
  The connection is never held during external IO. Geospatial S3 repo stays
  injected (reference data, not transactional).
- Handler: module-scoped engine (pool reused across warm invocations) + a UoW
  factory; whole-pipeline `with Session` gone. `build_first_run_pipeline`
  composes on the factory. Source clients still behind the raising seam.
- ADR-0012 records the decision (per-stage boundary, all-or-nothing batch,
  idempotent re-run, fetch/write split, module-scoped engine). Modelling stub
  left untouched (no-op, no DB) per the ADR.

Tests: orchestrators on a shared FakeUnitOfWork (assert persisted batch +
exactly-once commit + no-commit-on-raise). New real-DB E2E integration test:
real PostgresUnitOfWork, Ingestion writes the EPC → Baseline reads it back
through the repo → re-run replaces, not duplicates (1 EPC row, 1 baseline row
after two runs). 121 pass in tests/; pyright strict clean; AAA.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-31 09:54:47 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
b77fe26892 feat(first-run): FirstRunPipeline E2E — Ingestion → Baseline → Modelling (#1136)
Completes the First Run spine. Replaces the #1130 stub FirstRunPipeline
with the real three-stage composition and wires it into the handler.

- `FirstRunPipeline.run(command)` sequences Ingestion → Baseline →
  Modelling, threading **only** `property_ids` between stages (and
  `scenario_ids` into Modelling, off the command — never a prior stage's
  output). Stages are injected behind thin `IngestionStage` /
  `BaselineStage` / `ModellingStage` Protocols (the EpcFetcher/SolarFetcher
  idiom), so the handler owns wiring and tests substitute fakes (ADR-0011).
- `ModellingOrchestrator` stub + `ScenarioRepository` / `MaterialsRepository`
  seam ports — `run(property_ids, scenario_ids)` reads through repos, does
  no scoring yet. Method shapes deferred to the Modelling per-service grills
  (Scenario / Scenario Phase / Snapshot / Optimised Package / Plans are rich
  — not pre-empted here).
- Handler delegates to the real pipeline via `build_first_run_pipeline`
  (Postgres-backed repos off the session). The Ingestion source clients
  (EPC API / Google Solar / geospatial S3) are isolated behind one
  `_source_clients_from_env` seam that raises until the deploy/Terraform
  config settles — out of scope for this slice. Subtask complete/failed +
  CloudWatch URL still come from `@subtask_handler`.

Integration test (the criterion's centrepiece): wires REAL Ingestion +
REAL Baseline + stub Modelling through a shared fake EPC repo, with a
repo-backed PropertyRepo composing the Property from that slice. Proves
Baseline reads the very EPC Ingestion persisted — the through-repos
hand-off, no in-memory coupling. Plus a composition test pinning stage
order + only-property_ids threading.

TDD, one test → one impl. pyright strict clean; AAA layout. 116 pass in
the tests/ tree, no regressions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-30 22:32:58 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
76717dfc3a feat(baseline): BaselineOrchestrator + BaselinePerformance aggregate (#1135)
Stage 2 of First Run. Establishes each Property's Baseline Performance
from persisted source data and writes it back — reads only from repos,
never a Fetcher or HTTP (ADR-0003), so it is byte-identical whether
Ingestion ran milliseconds ago or last week.

Domain (`domain/baseline/`):
- `Performance` VO — the four rated quantities: SAP / EPC Band / CO2 /
  Primary Energy Intensity. `lodged_performance(epc)` reads them off the
  EPC's recorded fields (PEUI = `energy_consumption_current`).
- `BaselinePerformance` (ADR-0004) — the paired `lodged` + `effective`
  Performance + `rebaseline_reason`, plus the no-derivation part of the
  energy block (`space_heating_kwh` / `water_heating_kwh`, off the RHI,
  deterministic per ADR-0006). Both halves always populated.
- `Rebaseliner` port + `StubRebaseliner`: the re-score-on-override seam
  (ADR-0011). SAP10 certs pass through (effective == lodged, reason
  "none"); a pre-SAP10 cert raises `RebaselineNotImplemented` rather
  than fabricating a plausible-but-wrong "none" — ML rebaselining is not
  wired yet. Mirrors the repo's strict-raise culture.

Persistence: new `BaselineRepository` port + `BaselinePostgresRepository`
+ flat-column `baseline_performance` SQLModel (one row per Property). Per
ADR-0004's amendment this is a standalone table, NOT columns on the
retiring `property_details_epc`. Production migration is FE-owned
(Drizzle) — docs/migrations/baseline-performance-table.md.

Docs (grill-with-docs): corrected CONTEXT.md Lodged/Effective Performance
to Primary Energy Intensity (the term collided with its own _Avoid_ entry
under "heat demand") + fixed stale RHI field names; amended ADR-0004
Consequences for the standalone-table decision.

Fuel split + bills (rest of EPC Energy Derivation) deferred to a
follow-up — they need a Fuel Rates source (Ofgem-cap ETL) that does not
exist yet.

TDD, one test -> one impl: 7 tests (lodged read, rebaseliner pass-through
+ raise, orchestrator establish-and-persist + pre-SAP10 raise, Postgres
round-trip + absent). pyright strict clean; AAA layout.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-30 21:21:34 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
75fbba60fc feat(ara): AraFirstRunTriggerBody + ara_first_run lambda skeleton (#1130)
Stage-2 entry point for the First Run use case. Adds the
`ara_first_run` Lambda package mirroring the `postcode_splitter`
template, its typed trigger contract, and a stub `FirstRunPipeline`.

- `AraFirstRunTriggerBody`: thin command of five fields — `task_id`,
  `sub_task_id` (UUID, lifecycle), `portfolio_id`, `property_ids`,
  `scenario_ids` (int business IDs). No `model_config` override, so
  Pydantic's default `extra="ignore"` lets the FastAPI backend add
  fields without breaking deployed lambdas. UPRNs / Scenario defs are
  deliberately off the event — read from source-of-truth tables.
- Thin `handler.py`: validate-and-delegate only, via a named
  `dispatch_first_run` seam (testable without the Lambda runtime).
  Subtask status (in-progress/complete/failed) + CloudWatch log URL
  come for free from the existing `@subtask_handler()` decorator.
- `FirstRunPipeline` (orchestration/) stub: `run(command)` receives the
  validated command. Declares a structural `FirstRunCommand` Protocol
  (the three business fields) that `AraFirstRunTriggerBody` satisfies,
  so orchestration needs no application-layer import — rhymes with the
  `EpcFetcher`/`SolarFetcher` Protocols on IngestionOrchestrator
  (ADR-0011). Full Ingestion→Baseline→Modelling composition lands in
  #1136.
- Dockerfile / requirements.txt / local_handler/ mirror postcode_splitter.

TDD: 7 new tests (trigger-body validation incl. forward-compat +
id-types, pipeline seam, handler delegation). pyright strict clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-30 20:38:15 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
1696cccba6 feat(ingestion): IngestionOrchestrator end-to-end (#1134)
Stage 1 of the pipeline: per property, read its UPRN from the property row,
fetch its EPC, resolve coordinates from the Geospatial reference repo, thread
those into the Solar fetcher, and persist EPC + solar via repos. Fetchers never
call each other — the orchestrator threads the coordinate (ADR-0011). Coordinates
are reference data (deterministic from UPRN), resolved transiently to drive the
solar fetch rather than persisted per-property.

Depends on thin EpcFetcher/SolarFetcher Protocols (EpcClientService and
GoogleSolarApiClient satisfy them structurally). Unit-tested against fakes — no
DB, gov API, or network: persists EPC, threads coords into solar, skips
UPRN-less properties and skips solar when coordinates are absent. pyright clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-30 19:58:21 +00:00
Jun-te Kim
dc159e0b45 tests framework completed 2026-05-20 14:00:19 +00:00
Jun-te Kim
d0cf3d14ad get rid of comments 2026-05-20 13:21:11 +00:00
Jun-te Kim
914a8ed51e postcode splliter working e2e 2026-05-20 11:07:40 +00:00
Jun-te Kim
0a04448217 applications/postcode_splitter: PostcodeSplitterOrchestrator + Lambda entrypoint slice
Wires slice 1-5 primitives into a deployable splitter:

- orchestration/postcode_splitter_orchestrator.py: PostcodeSplitterOrchestrator
  loads addresses via UserAddressRepository, groups by postcode via
  iter_postcode_grouped_batches, persists each batch under
  ara_postcode_splitter_batches/{task_id}/{subtask_id}/, creates a WAITING
  child SubTask, and publishes an address2UPRN SQS message per batch.

- applications/postcode_splitter/: Lambda entrypoint. handler.py is decorated
  with @subtask_handler() so the parent SubTask lifecycle is decorator-owned;
  PostcodeSplitterTriggerBody validates the body. Dockerfile is the
  python:3.11 Lambda base with the DDD-shaped source layers and no pandas.

- tests/orchestration/test_postcode_splitter_orchestrator.py: integration
  test using moto S3 + moto SQS + in-memory SQLite that exercises the full
  wiring against a fixture CSV spanning three postcode groups (one
  oversize) and asserts child count, persisted inputs, queue bodies, and
  dispatch order.

backend/postcode_splitter/ and .github/workflows/deploy_terraform.yml are
intentionally unchanged: the dockerfile_path flip is deferred until the
companion backend/address2UPRN/ migration is also ready.
2026-05-19 17:46:12 +00:00
Jun-te Kim
d7f14033ba orchestration: add TaskOrchestrator.create_child_subtask primitive
Adds a primitive for creating a new WAITING SubTask under an existing
parent Task, routing all SubTask creation through the orchestrator
(replacing the legacy SubTaskInterface path used by the splitter).
Skips _cascade because a new WAITING child against an IN_PROGRESS
parent is a no-op under Task.recalculate_from_subtasks.
2026-05-19 17:19:41 +00:00
Jun-te Kim
54a674b5c8 added postcode splitter rewrite to ddd 2026-05-19 16:35:09 +00:00