Commit graph

10 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
832a30a985 Optimiser test fixtures are shared and domain-plausible 🟪
Review findings on PR #1526:

- tests/domain/modelling/_optimiser_fixtures.py is the one home for the
  overlay constants, the ScoredOption builder, the additive per-kind
  StubScorer and the forced ventilation dependency; test_optimiser.py and
  test_optimiser_fabric_first.py had byte-identical copies of each
  (and _StubScorer / _VentStubScorer fold into one parameterised stub).
- Fixture worlds are domain-plausible per team convention: the fabric-vs-
  heating contrast is a £12,000 EWI against a £3,200 gas boiler rather
  than a £500 heat pump undercutting a £1,000 cavity wall; heating
  overlays carry real identities (SAP Table 4a code 104 for the boiler,
  a PCDF index for the heat pump) instead of code 201 doubling as both;
  whole-dwelling double glazing is £3,500, not £500.
- Dead knobs removed: the unused _ROOF_OVERLAY, the always-zero roof
  gain, the duplicate _BOILER_OVERLAY, and the nested conditional
  expressions in the interaction stubs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-10 10:29:45 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
877d0043cb Ventilation-once test pairs the wall with glazing, not a competing wall 🟪
Review feedback: cavity and internal wall insulation are competing options,
so a package selecting both read as nonsense even in a synthetic fixture.
The behaviour under test (a dependency triggered in both phases injects
once) now uses an airtightness pair that genuinely coexists — cavity wall
in phase 1, double glazing re-entering in phase 2 — with the same numbers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-09 13:59:14 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
d51801089b Fabric gets first claim on the budget for every goal, not just Increasing EPC 🟩
Documents behaviour already delivered: with no SAP target both phases run
max-gain, so the envelope still consumes the budget first. Test passed on
arrival.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-09 11:42:54 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
dcc9f5d8aa A dwelling with no fabric candidates proceeds straight to the full pool 🟩
Documents behaviour already delivered: an empty phase 1 meets no target, so
phase 2 optimises every group — identical to a plain run. Test passed on
arrival.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-09 11:42:54 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
0220bee87c Forced ventilation is injected once across both fabric-first phases 🟥
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-09 11:41:27 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
adf60b82b1 Fabric unpicked in phase 1 can re-enter phase 2 on post-fabric worth 🟩
Documents behaviour already delivered: phase 2 optimises every group phase 1
did not consume, with signals re-scored against the fabric-applied dwelling,
so glazing skipped on raw-baseline merit re-enters when it closes the target.
Test passed on arrival.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-09 11:41:22 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
48ce18dbb6 Fabric spend comes out of the shared budget before phase 2 🟩
Documents behaviour already delivered by the phase-2 structure: the leftover
budget is the envelope minus the committed fabric cost, so a heating system
the plain optimiser would buy can be priced out. Test passed on arrival.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-09 11:41:22 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
705c86d5e6 Phase-2 candidates are valued against the post-fabric dwelling 🟥
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-09 11:40:29 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
e880ae868c Fabric short of the target is topped up with non-fabric measures 🟥
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-09 11:36:43 +00:00
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar
fcf46263bc Fabric-first scenario stops at fabric when the target is met 🟥
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-09 11:36:02 +00:00