mirror of
https://github.com/Hestia-Homes/Model.git
synced 2026-07-12 13:29:04 +00:00
5d556faf86
`u_roof` only implemented the joist column, so roofs lodged insulated at rafters (`roof_insulation_location == 1`) were mis-billed at the joist U on both the API and Summary paths — under-stating loss, over-rating SAP. RdSAP 10 §5.11.2 Table 16 (spec p.42-43) gives a distinct "insulation at rafters" column (2): the rafter cavity is shallower than a loft void, so the same depth yields a higher U (200 mm: rafters 0.29 vs joists 0.21). §5.11 Table 18 (p.45) likewise carries a rafters column (2) for unknown / as-built thickness (footnote (1): "The value from the table applies for unknown and as built") — band A-D = 2.30, E = 1.50, F = 0.68, diverging from the joist column's 100 mm-equivalent 0.40 default (footnote (4)). - add `_ROOF_RAFTERS_BY_THICKNESS` (Table 16 col 2) + `_ROOF_RAFTERS_BY_AGE` (Table 18 col 2) to rdsap_uvalues; `u_roof` selects them via a new `insulation_at_rafters` flag (ignored for flat / sloping-ceiling roofs). - `heat_transmission` derives the flag PER BUILDING PART from `roof_insulation_location` (gov-API int 1 / Summary "R Rafters"), which also fixes the multi-part dedup-roof-join problem: each part's own location now drives its U, replacing the unattributable joined `epc.roofs[]` description. Worksheet-validated to 1e-4: simulated case 41 (4-bp — Ext1 rafters 200mm → 0.29, Ext3 rafters As-Built band F → 0.68; roof total 24.8350) and case 42 (6 variants — rafters 50mm → 0.88, rafters unknown band C → 2.30, joists/none unchanged). Case 40 stays exact (roof 35.340, total 441.1606); worksheet harness 47/47. Corpus within-0.5 66.9% → 66.5% (gates 0.65/1.08 hold) — a spec-correct shift, NOT a regression: all 15 corpus rafter certs carry redacted (None) thickness yet lodge roof EER 2-4 (insulated), so the open API blanked a specified thickness and the spec's unknown-rafter 2.30 default correctly over-states them. Recovery needs a roof-EER→thickness inference on the API path (follow-up), not a change to the U-table. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| elmhurst_site_notes_1_text.json | ||
| elmhurst_site_notes_2_text.json | ||
| ElmhurstSiteNotes.pdf | ||
| ElmhurstSiteNotes_2.pdf | ||
| pashub_site_notes_1_text.json | ||
| pashub_site_notes_2_text.json | ||
| pashub_site_notes_3_text.json | ||
| pashub_site_notes_4_text.json | ||
| pashub_site_notes_5_text.json | ||
| pashub_site_notes_6_text.json | ||
| pashub_site_notes_7_text.json | ||
| PasHubSiteNotes_1.pdf | ||
| PasHubSiteNotes_2.pdf | ||
| PasHubSiteNotes_3.pdf | ||
| PasHubSiteNotes_4.pdf | ||
| PasHubSiteNotes_5.pdf | ||
| PasHubSiteNotes_6.pdf | ||
| PasHubSiteNotes_7.pdf | ||
| Summary_000474.pdf | ||
| Summary_000477.pdf | ||
| Summary_000480.pdf | ||
| Summary_000487.pdf | ||
| Summary_000490.pdf | ||
| Summary_000516.pdf | ||
| Summary_000565.pdf | ||
| Summary_000784.pdf | ||
| Summary_000884.pdf | ||
| Summary_000888.pdf | ||
| Summary_000889.pdf | ||
| Summary_000890.pdf | ||
| Summary_000897.pdf | ||
| Summary_000898.pdf | ||
| Summary_000899.pdf | ||
| Summary_000900.pdf | ||
| Summary_000901.pdf | ||
| Summary_000902.pdf | ||
| Summary_000903.pdf | ||
| Summary_000904.pdf | ||
| Summary_000910.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_6035.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_case5.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_case6.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_case7.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_case20.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_case21.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_case38.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_case39.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_case41_rafters.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_case42_50mm_rafters.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_case42_unknown_rafters.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_double_glazing.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_gas_combi.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_lpg_boiler.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_rr8w.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_rr_ext.pdf | ||
| Summary_001431_topfloor_flat.pdf | ||
| Summary_001479.pdf | ||
| Summary_case34_storage_flat.pdf | ||