mirror of
https://github.com/Hestia-Homes/Model.git
synced 2026-07-12 13:29:04 +00:00
782c686969
modelling_e2e properties with main fuel 39 failed at the price boundary (UnpricedFuelCode since #44fff767; previously mis-rated as non-electric → the ~14-SAP over-rating flagged in earlier review). Code 39 is SAP Table 12 "electricity, any tariff" (epc_codes.csv main_fuel 39 = "electricity, unspecified tariff"; spec footnote (j): defines an electric system, cost/CO2/PE = standard electricity). It was absent from API_FUEL_TO_TABLE_32, so to_table_32_code(39) was None → is_electric_fuel_code(39) False and pricing raised. Fix: map API_FUEL_TO_TABLE_32[39] = 30 (standard electricity) — the canonical place Khalim's fuel work added codes. One line makes classification, pricing, CO2/PE and the billing carrier all agree (39 → 30 → ELECTRICITY). Tests: to_table_32_code(39)==30, is_electric_fuel_code(39) True, price == standard electricity, and the billing carrier resolves to ELECTRICITY. 0 corpus impact (no lodged corpus cert uses 39); accuracy + mapper-corpus gates green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| addresses | ||
| billing | ||
| epc | ||
| epc_prediction | ||
| fuel_rates | ||
| magicplan | ||
| modelling | ||
| property | ||
| property_baseline | ||
| sap10_calculator | ||
| tasks | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| test_building_geometry.py | ||
| test_postcode.py | ||