mirror of
https://github.com/Hestia-Homes/Model.git
synced 2026-07-19 17:03:02 +00:00
2e466ed1e6
An as-built cavity wall (wall_insulation_type=4) lodged "Cavity wall, as
built, insulated (assumed)" was routed to RdSAP 10 Table 6's "Filled
cavity" row. Per Table 6 (England, PDF p.41) the Filled-cavity row carries
the "†" footnote ("assumed as built") only at age bands I-M, where it is
numerically identical to "Cavity as built"; at bands A-H the Filled-cavity
row represents a GENUINE fill, not the as-built assumption. So an as-built
cavity must use the "Cavity as built" row at all bands (band G/H = 0.60,
not the filled 0.35).
This is the same latent A-H bug slice S0380.210 fixed for the "partial
insulation (assumed)" variant but left in place for "insulated (assumed)"
by a legacy production convention. The API SAP-accuracy cohort over-rated
"Cavity wall, as built, insulated (assumed)" certs at bands G/H by a clean
+1.38 / +1.61 SAP median (n=37 / n=18); bands I-M were unaffected (rows
coincide), confirming the spec mechanism per-band.
Retires the `_cavity_described_as_filled` description sniffer — as-built
cavities now always use the as-built row regardless of the rendered
insulation adjective; a genuine retrofit fill is still caught by the
explicit wall_insulation_type=2 branch.
API SAP eval: 48.6% -> 52.1% within 0.5; <1.0 63.8% -> 67.2%; median |err|
0.548 -> 0.475; mean|err| 1.561 -> 1.497; 909 computed, 0 raises.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| climate | ||
| rdsap | ||
| validation | ||
| worksheet | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| test_bre_worked_examples.py | ||
| test_calculator.py | ||
| test_pcdb_etl.py | ||
| test_pcdb_lookup.py | ||
| test_pcdb_table_322_lookup.py | ||
| test_pcdb_table_329_lookup.py | ||
| test_pcdb_table_362_lookup.py | ||
| test_postcode_weather.py | ||
| test_table_12.py | ||
| test_table_12a.py | ||
| test_table_13.py | ||
| test_table_32.py | ||