mirror of
https://github.com/Hestia-Homes/Model.git
synced 2026-07-12 13:29:04 +00:00
5b4a1b4966
Gov-API certs that lodge a gas boiler as main_heating_category=2 + a PCDB
main_heating_index_number but omit sap_main_heating_code were carried with
a null code, so the heating generators (which gated on sap_main_heating_code
alone) never evaluated them for a boiler upgrade or a system tune-up — they
silently got nothing (£0 works, plateau at D). The SAP calculator already
handles this shape (cert_to_inputs._is_wet_boiler_main), so the calculator
modelled these as wet boilers while the recommenders ignored them.
Mirror the calculator's classification in the generator:
- _is_wet_boiler / _is_electric_boiler fall back, when no SAP code is
lodged, to a PCDB Table 105 boiler index or main_heating_category in
{1,2} (heat pumps excluded); electric boilers stay excluded by the code
range when lodged, else by an electricity main fuel.
- _already_condensing reads the boiler's declared PCDB winter efficiency
when there is no Table 4b code, so a modern condensing boiler lodged this
way still isn't offered a pointless like-for-like swap (gets a tune-up).
Verified read-only on portfolio 814 / scenario 1271: pids 742304, 742306,
742322, 742325, 742336 now get a gas_boiler_upgrade (two cross D->C on the
boiler alone) where they had £0 works; predicted properties whose heating
donor is a PCDB-shape boiler (e.g. 742095/742102/742105) also recover a
tune-up. Fixes the A#2 slice of #1388 (and unblocks 742302/742367).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| generators | ||
| optimisation | ||
| scoring | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| ashp_rates.json | ||
| considered_measures.py | ||
| contingencies.py | ||
| heating_rates.json | ||
| measure_type.py | ||
| plan.py | ||
| portfolio_goal.py | ||
| product.py | ||
| products.py | ||
| recommendation.py | ||
| scenario.py | ||
| simulation.py | ||
| solar_potential.py | ||
| solar_rates.json | ||
| valuation.py | ||