"Total carbon saved" on the reporting scenario overlay went negative (portfolio 796: -10,673 t/yr, £/tCO2 -8,195). Cause: the baseline side (getTotals → carbonSql) summed bp.lodged_co2_emissions_t_per_yr, which is NULL for predicted-only properties (12,064 of 796's 31,919 — no mirrored lodged estimate is written), so they contributed nothing to the baseline. The scenario side counted their plans' post_co2_emissions (21,046 t) in full, dragging saved below zero. The same subtraction fed £-per-tonne-CO2 and average-per-unit. carbonSql and energyConsumptionSql were left on lodged_* when ADR-0002 (effective performance is the canonical current, superseding "reporting stays on lodged") migrated the SAP fragments — the same reporting cards were already mixing effective SAP with lodged carbon. Move both to effective_*, which is populated for every property with a baseline row and is the figure the plans' post_* values were scored against. All call sites (reporting averages/totals, both scenario metrics routes, portfolio table CO2 column/filter) are current-state surfaces, so none wanted lodged. Legacy branch untouched. Verified live on 796: baseline and scenario totals computed in one snapshot with the shared fragment give saved = +4,059 t/yr (a plan regeneration was writing 796 mid-diagnosis, so values drift run-to-run; pre-fix the same snapshot maths gives ~ -13k and worsening as plans land). Legacy portfolio 433 totals unchanged. No regression-test seam exists for cross-query consistency (no DB test harness); consistency is structural — both sides compose the same carbonSql fragment. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .claude | ||
| .devcontainer | ||
| .github/workflows | ||
| .vscode | ||
| backlog | ||
| cypress | ||
| docs | ||
| drizzle/meta | ||
| public | ||
| src | ||
| .db-env | ||
| .eslintrc.json | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| components.json | ||
| CONTEXT.md | ||
| cypress.config.ts | ||
| devcontainer.sh | ||
| drizzle.config.ts | ||
| generate_migration.sh | ||
| migrate_to_db.sh | ||
| next.config.js | ||
| package-lock.json | ||
| package.json | ||
| postcss.config.js | ||
| README.md | ||
| run_build.sh | ||
| run_local.sh | ||
| skills-lock.json | ||
| tailwind.config.js | ||
| tsconfig.json | ||
| vitest.config.ts | ||
This is a Next.js project bootstrapped with create-next-app.
Getting Started
When first getting set up you'll firstly want to install the existing dependencies. To do this, simply run
npm install
# or
yarn install
First, run the development server:
npm run dev
# or
yarn dev
# or
pnpm dev
Open http://localhost:3000 with your browser to see the result.
You can start editing the page by modifying app/page.tsx. The page auto-updates as you edit the file.
This project uses next/font to automatically optimize and load Inter, a custom Google Font.
Learn More
To learn more about Next.js, take a look at the following resources:
- Next.js Documentation - learn about Next.js features and API.
- Learn Next.js - an interactive Next.js tutorial.
You can check out the Next.js GitHub repository - your feedback and contributions are welcome!
Deploy on Vercel
The easiest way to deploy your Next.js app is to use the Vercel Platform from the creators of Next.js.
Check out our Next.js deployment documentation for more details.
We currently have a development version, found at https://assessment-model-dev.vercel.app, and a production version at https://assessment-model.vercel.app, however the production version is missing a significant number of environmental variables, which will need to be added.
Drizzle ORM
We're using Drizzle ORM to interface with our AWS Postgres database. Documentation on getting set up can be found here
Schemas
In order to get started with Drizzle, a schema needs to be created. Schemas can be added src/app/db/schema as typescript files. See the documentation on how to set up schemas but effectively, Drizzle allows you to define schemas as typescript code, which allows for simple, type safe schema definitions.
Creating Migrations
To create a migration, a command has been set up in package.json. Simply run
npm run migration:generate
Or with yarn/pnmp accordingly.
Note, there seems to be a bug with Drizzle which is documented here.
The workaround is to open up tsconfig.json and comment out "target": "es5", and replace it with "target": "ESNext". This should hopefully only
be a temporary workaround required.
Pushing migrations
To push migrations, another command has been set up in package.json, since drizzle-kit currently does not support pushing for Postgres out of the box.
Run
npm run migration:push
Which will commit changes to the database. The database changes will be pushed to the public schema, whereas a meta record will be pushed to the __drizzle_migrations schema.
Inserting users into the database
In order to insert a user into the database, simply run
npm run create_users -- {email} {firstName}
Since we're using just the built in process arguments to read command line arguments, the ordering of arguments needs to be email address and then name
Cypress Testing Documentation
This document provides an overview of how to perform end-to-end testing using Cypress for the login functionality of the application. The testing code is based on the provided code snippets.
Prerequisites
Node.js installed on your machine Cypress installed as a dev dependency in your project
Test Execution
To execute the login tests, follow these steps:
- Run
npm run test:e2e:open
Which will open Crypress test runner
- Select the tests that you want to run. At the time of writing, only login tests have been completed
Key files
The key files that are at play for testing are documented here. Because of some issues testing next-auth and setting cookies, a custom command to set
the JWT, and avoid the functionality defined in the signIn function as defined in src/app/api/auth/[...nextauth]/route.ts
cypress/plugins/index.js is a standard file, required by cypress to journey through the Google Oauth flow
cypress/figtures/session.json is a user fixture that is used to log in a user in the login tests
cypress/support/commands.ts creates a custom login user command which sets a JWT and allows us to actually authenticate. cy.intercept only mocks the client side behaviour of the apis and therefore does not set any cookies, do this function does this manually.
Generating pre-signed urls
In our terraform stack, we have a module called s3_presignable_bucket which contains the definition for our bucket which we will use to store retrofit plan input csv's in.
We will generate a pre-signed url and then make a post request to that endpoint to store that data to s3. Part of that process is the creation of an AWS IAM role which contains
the permission set to access the bucket, rerofit-plan-inputs-<stage>. The name of this IAM role is s3_presign_role_<stage> and for our NextJS application, as it's hosted outside of AWS (for the moment), we need to generate a set of access credentials to give the application access to this bucket. The access key and secret key are automatically generated and stored in AWS secrets manager under dev/presign_frontend/access_key and dev/presign_frontend/secret_key and need to be set in the environment for the pre-sign api to store csv data to aws.