A Summary §14.0 Table 4b gas boiler (SAP code 101-119) lodges no §14.0
"Fuel Type" string in the newer Elmhurst export. The carrier was resolved
only from §15.0 "Water Heating Fuel Type" — fine when the same boiler
heats the water, but a gas boiler paired with a SEPARATE electric
immersion lodges §15.0 "Electricity", so `_elmhurst_gas_boiler_main_fuel`
returned None and the cascade strict-raised MissingMainFuelType.
Cert 001431 boiler-1/boiler-2 "before" variants are exactly this config:
§14.0 SAP code 102/104 (mains-gas boiler), §15.0 electric immersion
(code 909), §14.2 Meters "Main gas: Yes". The meter flag is the
authoritative carrier signal — a 101-119 boiler on mains gas burns mains
gas — so adopt it (SAP10 main_fuel 26 per _ELMHURST_MAIN_FUEL_TO_SAP10
"Mains gas") when §15.0 can't disambiguate. §15.0 gas/LPG still wins when
present (keeps LPG-vs-mains-gas precision); no mains-gas meter + non-gas
§15.0 still strict-raises rather than guessing.
Spec: SAP 10.2 Table 4b "Seasonal efficiency for gas and liquid fuel
boilers" (PDF p.168), rows 101-119. Both certs now resolve main_fuel=26
and compute (was: hard raise).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A 440 mm (>420 mm) solid brick AS-BUILT wall computed U = 1.70 (the
220 mm bucket default) instead of the RdSAP-correct 1.10. The §5.7
Table 13 thickness path only fired for *insulated* brick (external/
internal + thickness > 0); the as-built case fell through to the
Table 6 cavity/solid age-band default.
Spec: RdSAP 10 Specification (9th June 2025), §5.7 "U-values for
uninsulated brick walls, age bands A to E", Table 13 (PDF p.40):
≤200 mm → 2.5, 200–280 mm → 1.7, 280–420 mm → 1.4, >420 mm → 1.1.
Table 6 footnote (b) on the "Solid brick as built" row (PDF p.40):
"Or from 5.7 if wall thickness is other than 200mm to 280mm" — the
thickness table supersedes the flat 1.7 default whenever a documentary
wall thickness is lodged (200–280 mm gives 1.7 either way). The §5.8 /
Table 14 dry-lining R is added on top only when the wall is dry-lined,
per the §5.7 closing sentence.
Validated against the user-generated Elmhurst worksheet "simulated
case 21" (replica of API cert 2818-3053-3203-2655-9204: mid-terrace,
age band B, solid brick as-built 440 mm, room-in-roof). New §3 cascade
pin `test_section_3_wall_u_by_thickness_case21_match_pdf` routes the
Summary through the real extractor + mapper and pins:
(31) 155.1000, (33) 175.6208, (36) 23.2650, (37) 198.8858 — all 1e-4.
External walls Main U → 1.1000; Sheltered RR gable → 1/(1/1.10+0.5) =
0.71 (was 0.92). Pinned on §3 only (case-6 precedent): its code-908
instantaneous multi-point gas water heater has a separate §4 (219) gap.
Cross-check: sim case 20 (220 mm) stays at 1.70 — unchanged.
API SAP accuracy (scripts/eval_api_sap_accuracy.py, 896 computed certs):
% |err| < 0.5 SAP vs lodged: 42.6% → 43.8%; mean |err| 2.045 → 2.010.
Regression: tests/domain/sap10_calculator/ (1861), backend/
documents_parser/tests/ (574), datatypes/epc/ + rdsap golden fixtures
all green (pre-existing test_total_floor_area excepted). pyright strict
net-zero. No solid-brick fixture pin shifted (200–280 mm unchanged).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A Detailed room-in-roof lodges "Stud Wall" surfaces, but the cascade billed
every one through Table 17 from its insulation — over-counting fabric on
internal studs that carry no heat loss. sim case 20's two studs lodge §8.1
Default U-value 0.00 and the P960 worksheet omits them from BOTH fabric heat
loss (§3: (33)=285.9847) and total exposed area (31)=239.68; the cascade
computed ~0.52 each → (33) +4.16 W/K and continuous SAP 43.05 vs 43.6322.
Gate the drop on the lodged Default U-value: 0.00 → internal knee wall,
return None (no heat loss, no area); positive → a real exposed knee wall
(cert 000565 Ext2 Detailed: 0.31 / 0.10) that still falls through to the
Table-17 path. The earlier over-broad "drop all studs" zeroed 000565's
genuine studs — this keeps them.
Pins test_summary_001431_case20_fabric_heat_loss_matches_worksheet_line_33
((33)=285.9847 at 1e-4); case 20 continuous SAP now EXACT (43.6322). 2850
pass (the lone test_total_floor_area failure is pre-existing on base);
pyright strict net-zero (32=32).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sim case 20's §11 lodges 5 windows but only 1 surfaced. The "W H Area"
cells tokenize inconsistently: a narrow Area column keeps all three on one
line ("1.80 2.10 3.78" — matches _WIDTH_HEIGHT_AREA_RE), but a wider Area
column triggers pdftotext's 2+-space split, dropping the Area onto its own
line ("5.79 2.00" then "11.58"). The 3-decimal data anchor never matched
those four rows, so they were lost — gutting §6 solar gains (5 windows →
1) and dropping continuous SAP 43.05 → 38.32 vs the worksheet's 43.6322.
Pre-merge a "W H" line + a following lone-decimal Area into the canonical
"W H Area" line, gated on Area ≈ W × H (the §11 Area is always the product)
so a frame factor / g-value / U-value below a dimension line is never
absorbed. One-line layouts (3 decimals) are untouched.
Pins via test_summary_001431_case20_extracts_all_five_section11_windows
(Summary_001431_case20.pdf mirrors sap worksheets/golden fixture debugging/
simulated case 20/). 573 documents_parser tests pass; pyright strict net-zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
RdSAP 10 §2 (Ventilation, "Walls" row): "Structural infiltration: 0.25
for steel or timber frame or 0.35 for masonry construction ... System
build: treated as masonry." `_is_timber_or_steel_frame` wrongly included
wall_construction code 6 (system build) alongside code 5 (timber frame),
handing system-build dwellings the 0.25 structural ACH instead of 0.35.
On the cat-10 room-heater fixture (ref 001431, walls SY System Build →
code 6) this under-stated the infiltration rate (18) by exactly 0.10
(0.45 vs worksheet 0.55), dropping the effective air change (25), the
ventilation heat loss (38)m = 0.33 × (25)m × (5), and the heat-transfer
coefficient (39) — so space-heating demand (98) came out 404 kWh low
((211) 11158.6 vs worksheet 11563.2). Restrict the 0.25 branch to code 5
only; code 6 (and everything else) is masonry at 0.35.
Pins the rating-block (38)m ventilation heat loss mean = 83.3613 W/K at
abs 1e-4 and asserts the classifier treats the system-build wall as
masonry. §4 suite green (2415 passed, 1 skipped); no existing fixture
relied on system-build → 0.25.
Residual after this slice: SAP +0.03 / cost -£0.95 — a small fabric (33)
gap (-0.15 W/K) plus lighting (232) +1.0 kWh remain as separate causes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Water heating SAP code 909 (electric instantaneous) and 907 (single-point
gas) heat water at the point of use, serving one outlet with no
distribution pipework. Per SAP 10.2 §4 (p.23, l.1416): "'Single-point'
heaters, which are located at the point of use and serve only one outlet,
do not have distribution losses either." So worksheet (46)m = 0 and the
heat-required line collapses to SAP 10.2 worksheet l.7704
(62)m = 0.85 × (45)m + (46)m + (57)m + (59)m + (61)m
= 0.85 × (45)m (all loss terms zero for a no-cylinder system).
`distribution_loss_monthly_kwh` already supported the
`is_instantaneous_at_point_of_use` flag (and its docstring already named
codes 907/909), but `water_heating_from_cert` hard-coded it to False, so
the cascade applied (46)m = 0.15 × (45)m to single-point heaters. That
0.15 distribution loss exactly cancelled the 0.85 reduction, leaving
(62)m = (45)m. On the cat-10 room-heater fixture (ref 001431, code 909)
that over-stated the water fuel (219) as 2082.6250 instead of the
worksheet's 1770.2313, and inflated the (65)m heat gains (692.47 vs
worksheet 442.55) which in turn suppressed space-heating demand.
Thread the cert's existing instantaneous flag (`_INSTANTANEOUS_WATER_CODES`
= {907, 909}) through `_water_heating_worksheet_and_gains` into both the
demand-pass and final `water_heating_from_cert` calls.
Pins (219) water fuel = 1770.2313 at abs 1e-4 via the extractor → mapper →
rating cascade. §4 suite green (2414 passed, 1 skipped); no existing
fixture exercised the 907/909 path. The residual space-heating fuel gap
((211) 11158.59 vs worksheet 11563.17) this exposes is a separate cause —
next slice.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
cert 001431's §11 lodges 17 windows but only 14 surfaced, via two distinct gaps:
1. Extractor (_extract_windows_from_layout): the one "Double glazing, known
data" row whose §11 Data-Source cell is "BFRC data" was rejected — it is
laid out as a standalone keyword line with the U-value on the next line
and lodges no Frame Type/Factor/Gap cells, so it never matched the joined
"<source> <U>" Manufacturer-line shape. Now anchored by a standalone
data-source form, with the RdSAP 10 §3.7 default frame factor (0.7) for
the absent frame cell.
2. Mapper (_is_elmhurst_roof_window): the two "Double pre 2002" rows
(U 3.1 / 3.4 > 3.0) were reclassified as roof windows by the U-value
backstop even though both are lodged on an "External wall". A window
lodged on a wall is vertical by definition; guard the U-value backstop so
it only fires when location/BP give no roof signal.
With both closed: 17 sap_windows, 0 misrouted to sap_roof_windows.
Re-homed onto the mapper-validation line from feature/bill-derivation
(orig f68cea27); the modelling-only regression test
(tests/domain/modelling/test_window_extraction_001431.py) stays on
bill-derivation. KNOWN: the mapper guard breaks cert 000516's
test_summary_pdf_mapper_chain pins (W6 U=3.10 routing) — must be resolved
before this PRs to main.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
PR feedback (dancafc): `_parse_thickness_mm` handles a None input and
returns Optional[int], so its call-return locals — and the Optional[str]
raws they read from `_local_val` — read clearer when annotated. Annotates
`thickness_raw`/`ins_thickness_raw: Optional[str]` and
`thickness_mm`/`insulation_thickness_mm: Optional[int]` at all four call
sites (_wall_details_from_lines, _alternative_walls_from_lines,
_roof_details_from_lines, _floor_details_from_lines), plus the adjacent
`u_val_raw`/`default_u` Optional pair in _floor_details_from_lines for
consistency. Matches the project convention of typehinting call-return
locals. No behaviour change; pyright clean, 569 parser tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Completes the secondary-glazing family. S0380.235 mapped the unknown-data
(7) and normal-emissivity (11) secondary variants; the RdSAP-21.0.1
`glazed_type` enum also defines code 12 "secondary glazing, low
emissivity", whose Elmhurst §11 label "Secondary glazing - Low
emissivity" was unmapped and would strict-raise. Cascade code 12 carries
the same daylight/solar bucket as 7/11 (g_L=0.80, g⊥=0.76); the lodged
manufacturer U/g drive §3/§6. With this the double family (codes 1/2/3/
7/13 via their Elmhurst phrasings) and the secondary family (4/11/12) are
fully covered. Coverage test extended.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
RdSAP 10 §3.3: "As Main Wall: Yes" makes an extension inherit the main
dwelling's external wall CONSTRUCTION only — the party wall type is
lodged separately per building part in the Summary §7 block and may
differ. `_extract_extensions` was copying `main_walls.party_wall_type`
into the inherited WallDetails, so every extension reused the main's
party wall U.
On the double_glazing fixture (Summary_001431) the Main lodges party
"CU Cavity masonry unfilled" (SAP10 wall_construction 4 → u_party_wall
0.5) but the 1st Extension lodges "U Unable to determine" (→ 0 → RdSAP
default 0.25). Pre-fix both building parts used 0.5, inflating worksheet
(32) party-wall heat loss by 6.56 W/K (Ext1 26.25 m² × 0.25). After the
fix worksheet (32) is exact: ours 32.573 vs worksheet 32.5725.
Now reads the extension's own "Party Wall Type" from its §7 chunk,
falling back to the main's only when the extension lodges none. Adds a
fixture + test asserting Main=4 / Ext=0 with distinct u_party_wall.
Suite 2413 pass; no cohort regression.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The double_glazing recommendation fixture (Summary_001431) exercises every
RdSAP-21 §11 glazing lodging in one cert; five labels were missing from
`_ELMHURST_GLAZING_LABEL_TO_SAP10` and strict-raised `UnmappedElmhurstLabel`:
"Secondary glazing" -> 7 (Table 6b "secondary glazing", g_L 0.80)
"Secondary glazing - Normal emissivity" -> 11 (RdSAP-21 secondary normal-E, g_L 0.80)
"Triple pre 2002" -> 10 (triple pre-2002, g_L 0.70)
"Triple with unknown install date" -> 6 (generic triple glazed, g_L 0.70)
"Single glazing, known data" -> 15 (single known-data, g_L 0.90)
The glazing code's only cascade effect is the §5 (66)..(67) daylight factor
g_L in `_G_LIGHT_BY_GLAZING_CODE` (single 0.90 / double+secondary 0.80 /
triple 0.70); the lodged manufacturer U-value and solar_transmittance drive
§3 / §6 directly (`_g_perpendicular` prefers the lodged value). Codes are the
semantically-exact RdSAP-21 rows within the correct g_L bucket, kept distinct
for the strict-raise audit trail. Adds a full-coverage test over all 13
distinct labels. Suite 2413 pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 Appendix G4 (PDF p.72-73). A PV diverter routes surplus PV
generation (the would-be export EPV,m × (1 − βm)) to an immersion heater
in the hot-water cylinder. Per G4 step 4:
SPV,diverter,m = EPV,m × (1 − βm) × 0.8 × fPV,diverter,storageloss
(0.8 = cylinder heat-acceptance; fPV,diverter,storageloss = 0.9 for the
higher storage temperature), clamped to ≤ (62)m + (63a)m, and entered as
the negative worksheet (63b)m (step 5). The β factor is computed on the
PRE-diverter (219) per the §3a note (lines 5485-5486). Effects:
- (64)m = (62)m + (63b)m → less main-system water-heating fuel (219);
- export drops to EPV,ex,m = EPV,m(1 − βm) + (63b)m / 0.9 (§4 p.94
line 5501); the onsite dwelling portion EPV,m × βm is unchanged.
Inclusion (G4 step 1) requires ALL of: a PV system connected to the
dwelling; a cylinder larger than (43) average daily HW use; no solar
water heating; no battery — else the diverter is disregarded.
Three layers:
- extractor reads Summary §19 "Diverter present"; schema 21.0.0/21.0.1
SapEnergySource gains `pv_diverter` (API `sap_energy_source.pv_diverter`);
- `Renewables.pv_diverter_present` + domain `SapEnergySource.pv_diverter_present`,
set in both the Elmhurst and API mapper paths;
- `_pv_diverter_monthly_kwh` applies the G4 math after the β split;
`cert_to_inputs` recomputes (219) and the PV export.
On simulated case 19 (electric storage heaters, 7-hour, PV + diverter):
SAP continuous 50.33 → 51.34 (worksheet 51.2221; both round to the
lodged 51), cost (255) 1847.5 → 1812.3 (ws 1816.6), CO2 (272) 3331 →
3120 (ws 3126), with (233a) dwelling 1280.6 (ws 1280.4). The residual
+0.11 SAP is an upstream winter Appendix-M monthly-EPV-shape gap +
fabric (33) +1.0, tracked as the next case-19 cause. Suite: 2412 pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The gov-EPC API mapper sets BOTH roof_construction (int) and
roof_construction_type (str, derived via _API_ROOF_CONSTRUCTION_TO_STR),
but the Elmhurst mapper set only the string — leaving roof_construction
None on every site-notes cert. The SAP cascade reads the STRING (so SAP
cross-mapper parity always held), but consumers of the int (e.g.
domain/sap10_ml/transform.py ML aggregates `main_dwelling_roof_
construction`) silently saw None on the Elmhurst path.
New `_elmhurst_roof_construction_int` maps the Elmhurst roof-type code to
the same SAP10 int the API lodges (F→1, PN→3, PA→4, PS→8, S/A→7),
harvested from the committed Summary fixtures. Unlike the wall map it
returns None (not a strict-raise) for unmapped codes: the int is not
cascade-load-bearing, so an unknown roof must not block the cert (vaulted
5 / thatched 6 / NR omitted until a fixture surfaces them).
The 6 hand-built U985 reference fixtures gain the matching
roof_construction int (4/4/3 etc.) so test_from_elmhurst_site_notes_
matches_hand_built_* still asserts structural parity. SAP output is
unchanged (cascade reads the string). §4 suite green (2407 passed); the
two pre-existing stone-§5.6 sap10_ml failures are unrelated/out of scope.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
RdSAP10 `wall_construction == 6` is canonically WALL_SYSTEM_BUILT — a
WALL TYPE — but the gov-EPC basement heuristic hijacked it: Elmhurst
lodges both "SY System build" and "B Basement wall" as code 6, and the
API lodges basements as code 6 too, so a system-built wall was
mis-flagged `main_wall_is_basement` → wrong RdSAP §5.17 / Table 23
u_basement_wall/u_basement_floor overrides, and downstream the solid-wall
Recommendation Generator couldn't offer EWI/IWI on system-built walls.
System-built stays the wall type on its canonical code 6; the basement
signal moves OFF code 6 to a dedicated `is_basement` (SapAlternativeWall)
/ `wall_is_basement` (SapBuildingPart) Optional[bool] flag:
- Elmhurst: `_elmhurst_wall_is_basement` sets it from the distinct
"SY"/"B" labels (False for SY, True for B, None otherwise).
- gov-EPC API: per-wall code 6 can't be told apart at lodging time, so
`from_api_response` post-processes via `_clear_basement_flag_when_
system_built` — when the cert addendum marks the dwelling system-built,
the code-6 basement heuristic is cleared. A genuine basement (no
addendum signal) keeps the code-6 fallback.
- `main_wall_is_basement` / `is_basement_wall` honour the flag when set,
else fall back to the code-6 heuristic — so untouched API basements and
the cert 000565 "B" cohort are unchanged.
`EpcPropertyData.system_build` is a derived property over the wall type:
the MAIN wall is system-built iff `wall_construction == 6` and it is not
flagged basement. System-built lives on `wall_construction`; the basement
attribute is separate.
Acceptance: a system-built main wall (Elmhurst SY, or API addendum
system_build) → wall_construction == 6, main_wall_is_basement is False,
system_build is True; a genuine basement main wall → main_wall_is_basement
is True, system_build is False. Full §4 suite green (2404 passed).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Summary-path mapper raised UnmappedElmhurstLabel for a §15.1
"Cylinder Insulation Type: Jacket" lodging — only "Foam" (→1, factory)
was mapped. SAP10 cylinder_insulation_type uses 2 for loose jacket
(matching the GOV.UK API codes), and SAP 10.2 Table 2 Note 1 gives it a
separate ~2× storage-loss factor that the cascade now handles
(S0380.224). Add "Jacket" → 2 for cross-mapper parity with the API path
and so the loose-jacket storage-loss branch fires on the Summary path.
Surfaced by simulated case 19 (a 210 L jacket cylinder + electric storage
heaters), which previously couldn't extract at all. §4 suite 2397 passed;
mapper.py pyright unchanged at 32.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Summary PDFs preprocessed from `pdftotext -layout` wrap the windows-table
header across several lines. The third header line's tail ("U value / g
value / Draught Proofed / Permanent Shutters") tokenises to "value value
Proofed Shutters" and lands directly above the FIRST window's data row.
Because the first window in a building part has `before_start = 0`, its
prefix block reaches back into that header remnant. The remnant is
neither an orientation nor a building-part fragment, so it survived the
pops in `_compose_window_descriptors` and leaked into glazing_type as
"value value Proofed Shutters Double between 2002 and 2021" (windows 2-3,
whose prefix starts after the previous window's manufacturer line, were
clean).
Fix: the glazing-type phrase always starts with a glazing-start word
(Single/Double/Triple/Secondary), so trim any prefix fragments preceding
that word before joining the glazing type. Orientation/bp pops still run
on the full prefix, so they are unaffected.
Reproduced from `sap worksheets/Recommendations Elmhurst Files/
cavity_wall_insulation - main wall/before/Summary_001431.pdf`. Added a
regression test driving the real `_extract_windows_from_layout` path with
the verbatim tokenised header+rows. 2306 passed (+4), pyright net-zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds the user-simulated 001431 case (the cert that drove S0380.189/.190)
as an Elmhurst-only e2e fixture: Summary PDF → extractor → mapper →
calculator, every Block-1 SapResult field pinned against the
P960-0001-001431 worksheet at abs=1e-4. All 11 pins pass with zero
residual — the case is clean, confirming the S0380.190 gas-combi fuel
derivation closes the Summary path natively.
Verified the handover's flagged "+0.0007 SAP" was a target artifact, not
a cascade gap: the worksheet displays ECF (257) rounded to 1.6047 and
integer SAP (258)=78; the cascade's continuous SAP is computed from the
UNROUNDED ECF = (255)*(256)/((4)+45) = 660.9750*0.4200/173.0, giving
77.6147 — which matches the worksheet's own unrounded value. Pinning the
continuous SAP from the display-rounded ECF (→ 77.6144) was the wrong
target. Block-1 line refs all match exactly: (211) 10699.7225, (219)
3327.1592, (231) 86.0, (232) 283.2229, (255) 660.9750, (272) 3000.1664,
Σ(98) 8987.7669.
Summary mirrored into the tracked fixtures dir as
Summary_001431_gas_combi.pdf (distinct name — the corpus reuses cert
001431 across every heating variant); source Summary + worksheet tracked
under sap worksheets/golden fixture debugging/ as the pin ground truth.
2302 passed (+11), 0 failed; pyright net-zero on new/changed files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CH6's P960 worksheet input lodges Distribution Loss = "Two adjoining
dwellings sharing a single heating system" → (306) DLF = 1.0000, vs CH4's
"Calculated" → 1.5 → (306) = 1.4500. That DLF choice swings SAP/cost/CO2/PE
materially, but it is NOT present in the Summary PDF that the corpus pipeline
consumes (Summary → ElmhurstSiteNotesExtractor → mapper → calculator).
Proven empirically with a user-supplied controlled pair (CH adjoined
dwellings/Summary_001431 (1) vs (2)): the two Summaries are byte-identical
across every RdSAP INPUT field, differing only in the derived header
(SAP 80 vs 75, bill £954 vs £1237, emissions 5.407 vs 7.394 t). A
case-insensitive scan of the CH6 Summary for "distribution"/"adjoin" returns
0 hits. Since CH4/CH6 Summaries are themselves identical bar fuel type, no
Summary-derivable rule can yield CH4=1.45 AND CH6=1.0.
Doc-only change (comment in _EXPECTATIONS); 20/20 community-heating corpus
tests pass. Closes the CH6 re-litigation: pin held.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 worksheet block 12b/13b (367)/(467) for a community heating
electric heat pump (Table 4a code 304 → Table 12 fuel 41 "heat from
electric heat pump"). The HP meters grid electricity, so per Table 12
note (s)/(t) + block 12b/13b footnote (a) its emission/PE factor is the
MONTHLY Table 12d/12e cascade (fuel 41 = standard-electricity profile),
weighted by the network heat profile, then × 1/heat-source-eff (1/COP):
(367)/(467) = [(307)+(310)] / COP × Σ((307+310)_m × factor_m)/Σ(...)
Per-line walk of CH3 (the displayed (367) 0.1535 / (467) 1.5717 are PDF
artifacts; the (373)/(473) totals reconcile only with):
CO2 factor = 0.15040 (monthly Table 12d wtd) vs cascade annual 0.136
PE factor = 1.55692 (monthly Table 12e wtd) vs cascade annual 1.501
Pre-slice the cascade routed code 304 through the non-electric branch
(`_co2_factor_kg_per_kwh(main) × 1/COP` = annual × scaling). New
`_is_heat_network_electric_main` (heat-network main whose fuel has a
Table 12d monthly set — i.e. fuel 41) routes all four factor helpers
(main + HW, CO2 + PE) through the monthly cascade × 1/COP. Non-electric
heat networks (gas 51 / oil 53 / coal 54) have no monthly set → annual
path unchanged (CH1, CH6 untouched).
Closure (CH3 was already SAP+cost EXACT):
CH3 (HP/Elec) CO2 −75.32→+0.0000 (= [(307+310)/3]×(0.1504−0.136)),
PE −249.32→−0.0000 (× (1.5569−1.501)) — FULLY EXACT
Corpus now 40/41 EXACT on all four metrics. Only CH6 remains: its
worksheet lodges a manual DLF=1.0 ("two adjoining dwellings") absent
from the Summary PDF (byte-identical to CH4 bar fuel type) — an
architectural limit, not a cascade gap. 2226 pass + 1 skip + 0 fail
(tolerances 1e-4 all metrics); pyright net-zero 43→43.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 §10b: hot water for a community-heating dwelling bills at the
heat-network rate, not the cert-lodged fuel. Elmhurst §15.0 lodges
`water_heating_fuel_type = "Mains gas"` (3.48 p/kWh) as a placeholder on
community certs; the worksheet (342) Water-heating cost = (310) × the
S0380.171 CHP heat-fraction blend — the SAME rate as space heating (340).
Per-line walk of the CH2 block 10b:
(340) space = 11837.83 × 0.037955 = 449.3047 (cascade EXACT)
(342) water = 3854.12 × 0.037955 = 146.2830 (cascade billed
3854.12 × 0.0348 = 134.12 → −£12.16, the whole residual)
(350) lighting + (351) standing → (355) 754.1502.
`_hot_water_fuel_cost_gbp_per_kwh`'s `inherit_main_for_community_heating`
path already routes HW cost through `_fuel_cost_gbp_per_kwh(main)` (the
CHP blend), but its gate `_is_community_heating_hw_from_main` excluded
code 302. S0380.182 wired the 302 CO2/PE credit via
`_heat_network_code_302_effective_factor`, which intercepts the HW
CO2/PE helpers ABOVE this predicate's branch — so extending the
predicate to include 302 now affects ONLY the cost path.
Closures:
CH2 (CHP/Gas) SAP +0.5277→−0.0000, cost −£12.16→−£0.00 — FULLY EXACT
CH4 (CHP/Oil) SAP +0.5277→−0.0000, cost −£12.16→−£0.00 — FULLY EXACT
CH6 (CHP/Coal) SAP −7.49→−8.02, cost +£172.68→+£184.84 — its HW now
also bills the blend, compounding the DLF=1.0 quirk
(cascade DLF=1.45); same separate CH6 DLF front.
Corpus now 39 variants EXACT on all four metrics (CH2/CH4 join). Open:
CH3 CO2/PE (code-304 community-HP COP), CH6 all-metric (DLF=1.0 manual
override the Summary doesn't carry). 2225 pass + 1 skip + 0 fail
(tolerances 1e-4 all metrics); pyright net-zero 32→32.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 worksheet block 12b (CO2) / 13b (PE) for community heating
"CHP and boilers" (SAP code 302). Per unit of network heat fuel
H = (307)+(310) the effective generation factor is:
chp×100/(362)×f_fuel − chp×(361)/(362)×f_disp + (1−chp)×100/(367)×f_fuel
(363)/(463) CHP fuel = chp_frac × 100/heat_eff × f_fuel
(364)/(464) less credit = −chp_frac × elec_eff/heat_eff × f_disp
(368)/(468) boiler fuel = (1−chp_frac) × 100/boiler_eff × f_fuel
f_fuel = Table 12 heat-network fuel factor (the CHP unit and the back-up
boilers burn the same community fuel — verified vs CH2 gas / CH4 oil /
CH6 coal worksheets (363)/(368)); f_disp = Table 12f (PDF p.196) credit
for the CHP-generated electricity. RdSAP 10 §C (p.58) defaults: heat eff
50% (362), electrical eff 25% (361), boiler eff 80% (367); CHP heat frac
0.35 per-cert via community_heating_chp_fraction.
New `_heat_network_code_302_effective_factor` + Table 12f flexible
constants (0.420 CO2 / 2.369 PE) + RdSAP §C efficiency constants, wired
into all four factor helpers (main + HW, CO2 + PE) ahead of the existing
single-fuel / 1-over-heat-source-eff path. The worksheet (368)/(468)
boiler emissions DISPLAY rounded/mis-aligned in the PDF, but the
(373)/(473)/(386)/(486) totals reconcile only with the boiler at the
full Table 12 factor — verified EXACT.
Two spec citations applied:
- Table 12f flexible-operation default for RdSAP community CHP is an
Elmhurst engine choice (Table 12f notes make "standard" the default);
mirrored per [[feedback-software-no-special-handling]] and documented
in SAP_CALCULATOR.md §8.3.
- Table 12 heat-network oil/biodiesel CO2 (codes 53/56) corrected
0.298 → 0.335 per Table 12 (p.189) "assumes 'gas oil'"; the code-302
oil cascade (CH4) was the first to exercise it. PE 1.180 was already
correct. No other variant uses these codes (no regression).
Closures (CO2 + PE only — the CHP credit does not touch cost/SAP):
CH2 (CHP/Gas) CO2 −1411.49→+0.0000, PE +1331.23→+0.0000 EXACT
CH4 (CHP/Oil) CO2 −4378.24→−0.0000, PE +319.81→−0.0000 EXACT
CH6 (CHP/Coal) CO2/PE re-pinned (+2411.54 / +5023.48) — its worksheet
lodges a manual DLF=1.0 the Summary doesn't carry, so
cascade DLF=1.45 over-scales H; same root as the CH6
SAP −7.49 / cost +£172 (separate DLF front).
CH2/CH4 are now CO2+PE-exact but still carry the heat-network cost/SAP
residual (+0.5277 SAP / −£12.16 cost, exposed by S0380.175 — cost-side,
untouched here). CH3 unchanged (code 304 community-HP COP front).
Corpus state: 37 variants EXACT on all four metrics (incl. CH1);
remaining residuals are CH2/CH4 cost+SAP, CH3 CO2+PE (HP COP), CH6
all-metric (DLF quirk). 2223 pass + 1 skip + 0 fail (tolerances 1e-4 all
metrics per S0380.181); pyright net-zero 43→43.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The corpus residual-pin tolerances had drifted looser than the comment
above them claimed ("pin at 1e-4 relative to lodged precision"): SAP was
1e-3, cost ±£0.01, CO2 ±0.1 kg, PE ±0.1 kWh. A ±0.1 kg CO2 band could
silently mask a ~0.09 kg drift on a variant we report as EXACT.
The worksheet pins are extracted from the P960 PDF text, which prints
4 d.p., so the hard residual floor is ~5e-5 (half a unit in the last
printed digit) regardless of cascade precision. 1e-4 sits just above
that floor. All 41 variants hold at uniform 1e-4 on continuous SAP,
cost, CO2 AND PE — confirming the 37 EXACT variants are genuinely exact
to PDF print-rounding and the looser bands were masking nothing.
Aligns the guard with [[feedback-zero-error-strict]] /
[[feedback-continuous-sap-tolerance]] (basically zero error across all
four metrics). Test-only change; no cascade behaviour touched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 Appendix C §C3.2 (PDF p.51), verbatim: "CO2 emissions and
Primary Energy associated with the electricity used for pumping water
through the distribution system are allowed for by adding electrical
energy equal to 1% of the energy required for space and water heating."
Worksheet line (313) = 0.01 × [(307)+(310)]; its CO2 (372) and PE (472)
bill on the Table 12d/12e monthly factors for fuel code 50 ("electricity
for pumping in distribution network"), weighted by the monthly heat
profile per worksheet footnote (a). (307)m/(310)m = (space_demand +
hw_output) / efficiency (the cascade models a heat network's generator
efficiency as 1/DLF).
This un-defers the (372)/(472) front the post-S0380.179 handover flagged
"don't guess until the factor source is identified": the source is
§C3.2 + Table 12d/12e code 50, NOT an empirical constant. The apparent
0.1994/0.2114 "factor" is an Elmhurst DISPLAY artifact — the worksheet
shows the (372) energy column as 0.01×(307) (space only) while computing
emissions on 0.01×(307+310) per the §C3.2 text. Verified EXACT line-by-
line against the CH2 corpus worksheet: (372)=23.6007 CO2 (rating),
(472)=208.2267 PE (demand).
New `_heat_network_distribution_electricity` helper (gated on
`_is_heat_network_main`) precomputes the energy + effective CO2/PE
factors; three new CalculatorInputs fields + calculator.py CO2/PE
summation terms (0.0/None → no-op for individually-heated certs).
Closures:
CH1 (Boilers/Gas) CO2 −23.60→−0.00, PE −208.23→+0.00 — FULLY EXACT
CH3 (HP/Elec) CO2 −98.92→−75.32, PE −457.54→−249.32 (distribution
component closed; code-304 community-HP COP remains)
CH2/CH4/CH6 gain their (372)/(472) component (CO2 +23.6, PE
+208.2); dominant CHP displaced-electricity credit
residual (Table 12f + block 12b/13b) is next slice.
No regression on the other 36 corpus variants (helper returns None off
heat-network mains) + golden + U985 fixtures. 2223 pass + 1 skip + 0
fail; pyright net-zero 43→43.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The calculator tests lived under domain/sap10_calculator/{tests,worksheet/
tests,rdsap/tests,climate/tests,validation/tests}, none of which are in
pytest.ini testpaths — so CI (which collects tests/) never ran them. Relocate
all five dirs to tests/domain/sap10_calculator/{,worksheet,rdsap,climate,
validation}, mirroring the tests/domain/property_baseline/ convention, so the
cascade-pin / golden / e2e conformance suites run in CI.
Mechanics:
- git mv preserves history (110 files).
- Flattening the trailing /tests keeps each file's depth-to-repo-root
identical, so all 16 repo-root parents[4] fixture refs stay valid. Only
test_pcdb_etl.py's parents[1] (→ pcdb data) and one hardcoded absolute
golden-fixture path in test_cert_to_inputs.py needed rebasing.
- Cross-imports rewritten domain.sap10_calculator.worksheet.tests →
tests.domain.sap10_calculator.worksheet (21 files incl. the external
importer backend/documents_parser/tests/test_summary_pdf_mapper_chain.py).
- Golden-fixture path strings in test_summary_pdf_mapper_chain.py +
scripts/fetch_cohort2_api_jsons.py updated to the new location (the JSONs
moved with the rdsap tests).
load_cells / gitignored worksheet xlsx: the xlsx-pinned tests (test_dimensions
/ ventilation / water_heating) read 2026-05-19-17-18 RdSap10Worksheet.xlsx,
which is gitignored (.gitignore `*.xlsx`) and so absent in CI. _xlsx_loader.
load_cells now pytest.skip()s when the file is absent, so those tests run
locally and skip cleanly in CI instead of erroring — no new CI failures from
the move, and the gitignore policy is respected.
Verified: tests/domain/sap10_calculator + backend/documents_parser +
tests/domain/property_baseline = 2248 pass, 1 skipped; pyright resolves the
new import paths with zero import-resolution errors.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes the "no system" corpus variant fully (ΔSAP +1.18 → <1e-4 on all
four metrics).
The cert lodges §15.0 "Water Heating Code: NON / SapCode 999" and §15.1
"Hot Water Cylinder Present: No". Per RdSAP 10 §10.7 (PDF p.55) "No
water heating system" verbatim: "the calculation is done for an
electric immersion heater. If the electric meter is dual the immersion
heater is also dual, but is a single immersion otherwise... for a
cylinder defined by the first row of Table 28 (110 litres) and the
first row of Table 29." Table 29 row 1 gives age-band cylinder
insulation (age G -> 25 mm foam) and assumes a cylinder thermostat
present for immersion-heated DHW.
The BRE-approved Elmhurst engine confirms the substitution: the P960
worksheet header lodges "WHS: 903 Electric immersion, Single", a 110 L
cylinder, and storage loss (56) = 594.32 kWh/yr, so HW (64) = (45)
1935.37 + 594.32 = 2529.6927.
Pre-slice the cascade trusted the lodged "no cylinder" -> added no
storage loss and a spurious Table 3a keep-hot combi loss; the wrong HW
heat-gains also propagated through §5/§7, over-stating the base MIT by
+0.25 K and space fuel by +228 kWh. New
`_apply_rdsap_no_water_heating_system_default(epc)` rebinds the epc at
the top of cert_to_inputs (the demand cascade delegates here too) when
water_heating_code == 999, injecting WHC 903 + electricity fuel +
110 L cylinder + Table 29 insulation + assumed cylinder thermostat.
This closes HW fuel AND the downstream space residual in one move.
Age bands A-F (12 mm loose jacket) raise UnmappedSapCode — no corpus
member exercises that and the Table 2 loss-factor dispatch only has the
factory-foam path plumbed. Gate is keyed on code 999, unique to "no
system" in the corpus; 40 other variants + 858 section pins + 6 U985
fixtures unchanged. 936 pass; pyright net-zero 32 -> 32.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes the residual S0380.177 exposed on oil 6. The cascade's central
heating pump used the bare Table 4f age default (41 kWh for "2013 or
later") but the worksheet (230c) = 53.3 kWh.
SAP 10.2 Table 4f (PDF p.175) footnote a) on the "Circulation pump"
rows reads verbatim: "Multiply by a factor of 1.3 if room thermostat
is absent." oil 6 lodges control code 2101 ("No time or thermostatic
control of room temperature") = no room thermostat, so 41 x 1.3 = 53.3
= ws (230c) EXACTLY; pumps/fans (231) = 53.3 + 100 (liquid-fuel boiler
flue fan/pump) = 153.3 EXACT. Same root cause (absent room thermostat)
as the S0380.177 Table 4c(2) interlock fix — both keyed on the new
`_BOILER_NO_ROOM_THERMOSTAT_CONTROL_CODES = {2101, 2102}`.
`_table_4f_circulation_pump_kwh` now multiplies the resolved pump kWh
by `_TABLE_4F_NO_ROOM_THERMOSTAT_PUMP_MULTIPLIER = 1.3` when the main's
control code is in that set.
oil 6 now FULLY EXACT on all four metrics (ΔSAP/cost/CO2/PE < 1e-4).
The sibling oil 5 (same "2013 or later" pump age but control 2106 WITH
a room thermostat) keeps the bare 41 kWh and is unaffected — as do the
other 39 corpus variants (2101/2102 appear only on oil 6). 935 pass;
pyright net-zero 32 -> 32.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
oil 6 (B30K standard liquid-fuel boiler, Table 4b code 126 winter 80 /
summer 68) lodges Main Heating Controls Sap code 2101 ("No time or
thermostatic control of room temperature") WITH a cylinder thermostat.
The cascade's `no_interlock` gate only checked the cylinder thermostat,
so oil 6 kept raw efficiency despite the P960 worksheet header lodging
"Boiler Interlock: No".
Per RdSAP 10 §3 (PDF p.57): boiler interlock is "assumed present if
there is a room thermostat and (for stored hot water systems heated by
the boiler) a cylinder thermostat. Otherwise not interlocked." Control
code 2101 (and 2102 "Programmer, no room thermostat") provides no room
thermostat — the two Table 4e Group 1 rows carrying the "+0.6 °C /
Table 4c(2)" annotation — so the boiler is NOT interlocked regardless
of the cylinderstat. SAP 10.2 Table 4c(2) (PDF p.169) "No thermostatic
control of room temperature – regular boiler" then deducts 5pp from
BOTH the Space and DHW seasonal efficiency.
Three changes in cert_to_inputs.py:
- new `_BOILER_NO_ROOM_THERMOSTAT_CONTROL_CODES = {2101, 2102}`;
- `no_interlock` now ORs room-thermostat absence with the existing
stored-HW cylinderstat-absence test (the RdSAP §3 conjunction);
- the Space -5pp leg fires for Table 4b non-PCDB boilers (code
101-141), not only PCDB-record boilers; the DHW leg is gated on a
cylinder being present (Table 4c(2) combi DHW = 0).
Result for oil 6: space fuel (211) = 13446.3457 EXACT, HW fuel (219) =
4099.5872 EXACT. ΔSAP +3.0518 → +0.0782, Δcost -£69.79 → -£1.68,
ΔCO2 -240.66 → -1.71, ΔPE -1112.66 → -18.61.
The spec-correct fix exposes a single residual cause (per
[[feedback-software-no-special-handling]]): the central heating pump
(230c) — cascade reads pump_age=2 → Table 4f 41 kWh but ws (230c) =
53.3 kWh. The 12.3 kWh gap fully accounts for the residual across all
three metrics; pinned as the S0380.178 forcing function.
All other 40 corpus variants + 858 section pins + 6 U985 fixtures
unchanged (2101/2102 boiler codes appear only on oil 6). Pyright
net-zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 §4 line 7702 (PDF p.137) defines (61)m as "Combi loss for
each month from Table 3a, 3b or 3c (enter '0' if not a combi
boiler)". Table 4b sub-rows 128 / 129 / 130 are explicit combi sub-
rows per the spec row names:
128: Combi oil boiler, pre-1998
129: Combi oil boiler, 1998 or later
130: Condensing combi oil boiler
Pre-slice `_table_3a_combi_loss_default_applies` gated only on
`main_heating_category ∈ {1, 2, 3, 6}`. The Elmhurst mapper leaves
`main_heating_category=None` on Table 4b liquid-fuel boilers (FAME,
HVO, B30K) — the cascade fell through to (61)m=0 despite the lodged
SAP code being a combi sub-row, under-counting (62)m by 600 kWh/yr
for FAME combi certs.
Extended the helper with a `_TABLE_4B_COMBI_OR_CPSU_CODES` fall-
through (set already exists for the symmetric `_primary_loss_
applies` Table 4b non-combi branch — see S0380.146). The set carries
the canonical combi + CPSU sub-row codes (103/104/107/108/112/113/
118/120-123/128-130). For cylinder-lodged certs the existing
`if epc.has_hot_water_cylinder: combi_loss_override = zero_monthly`
guard in `_water_heating_worksheet_and_gains` still pre-empts the
combi-loss fall-through correctly — non-combi codes with cylinders
remain (61)m=0.
Closures (heating-systems corpus 001431):
oil 3 (code 128, FAME, no cylinder) ALL EXACT (±0.0000):
ΔSAP_c +2.5863 → -0.0000
Δcost -£61.89 → -£0.00
ΔCO2 -14.58 → +0.00
ΔPE -967.10 → +0.00
oil 4 (code 129, FAME, no cylinder) ALL EXACT (±0.0000):
ΔSAP_c +2.5603 → +0.0000
Δcost -£56.66 → +£0.00
ΔCO2 -13.35 → +0.00
ΔPE -884.90 → +0.00
Oil 6 (code 126, NOT a combi, with cylinder) unchanged — the fix
is gated on the combi sub-row set. Cohort moves from 9 pinned
residuals to 7.
933 pass + 0 fail (+1 new mapper test). Pyright net-zero on cert_
to_inputs.py + tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 Table 4e Group 3 (PDF p.173) — heat-network control codes
2301-2314 dispatch to control_type 1, 2, or 3. Code 2306 = "Charging
system linked to use of heating, programmer and TRVs" →
control_type=3, temperature_adjustment=0. Per Table 9 the elsewhere-
zone off-hours depend on control_type: type 1/2 → (7, 8); type 3 →
(9, 8). The two extra off-hours change the §7 (90) T_rest mean by
~0.6 K → (92) MIT by ~0.4 K → (98) SH demand by ~390 kWh/yr.
Pre-slice diagnosis: cascade defaulted `main_heating_control=2`
(modal RdSAP) when the §14.0 "Main Heating Controls Sap" field was
empty. The 5 community heating corpus variants ALL lodge the SAP
code in §14.1 Community Heating "Heating Controls SAP" instead
(format: bare 4-digit integer, e.g. "2306"). The extractor was
storing this in `CommunityHeating.heating_controls_sap` but the
mapper only read `mh.heating_controls_sap` (§14.0).
Two changes:
1. `_elmhurst_sap_control_code` extended to accept bare 4-digit form
("2306") in addition to the §14.0 narrative form ("SAP code 2106,
Programmer, room thermostat and TRVs"). Empty-string returns None
instead of swallowing through the original `re.match` regex.
2. `_map_elmhurst_sap_heating` falls through to
`mh.community_heating.heating_controls_sap` when the §14.0 main
block leaves `heating_controls_sap` empty.
Closures (heating-systems corpus 001431):
CH1 ΔSAP_c -1.0572 → +0.0000 EXACT
Δcost +£24.36 → -£0.00 EXACT
CH3 ΔSAP_c -1.0572 → +0.0000 EXACT
Δcost +£24.36 → -£0.00 EXACT
CH2/CH4 SAP-side flip ±0.42 → ±0.53 (CHP-split blend reacts to
the now-lower SH demand × CHP rate)
CH6 ΔSAP_c -8.4406 → -7.4942 (DLF=1.0 P960 quirk untouched)
Remaining CH1/CH3 ΔCO2 -23.60 / ΔPE -208.23 is the §13a (372)
"Electrical energy for heat distribution" line (118.38 kWh × electric
factors 0.1993 CO2 / 1.760 PE). Cascade doesn't currently meter this
electricity overhead separately from heat-network heat — next slice.
932 pass + 0 fail (+5 new mapper tests). No regressions on the other
36 corpus variants — the mapper change is gated on `mh.community_
heating is not None` and only fires when §14.0 leaves the control
field empty. Pyright net-zero on mapper.py + corpus test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 §4 "Heat networks" (PDF p.17 line 1482):
"Primary circuit loss for insulated pipework and cylinderstat
should be included (see Table 3)."
SAP 10.2 Table 2b note b (PDF p.159) verbatim:
"Multiply Temperature Factor by 0.9 if there is separate time
control of domestic hot water (boiler systems, warm air systems
and heat pump systems)."
The Table 2b note b ×0.9 multiplier is restricted to "boiler / warm
air / heat pump systems" — community heating is omitted from that
verbatim list. Pre-slice the cascade applied the ×0.9 reduction
unconditionally when DHW was separately timed, AND omitted the Table
3 primary-loss path for heat-network mains entirely. Combined the
two gaps under-counted (62)m HW total demand by ~320 kWh/yr for
heating-systems corpus 001431 community heating 1 (8164 + 0 vs
448.74 + 273.90 spec losses).
Three changes:
1. New `_HEAT_NETWORK_PIPEWORK_INSULATION_FRACTION = 1.0` constant.
`_primary_loss_override` selects this for heat-network mains
instead of the RdSAP §3 age-band default, per the spec's literal
"insulated pipework" + back-solve from worksheet (59) Jan = 23.26
= 31 × 14 × (0.0091×3 + 0.0263).
2. Extended `_primary_loss_applies` with a new branch: heat-network
main + WHC ∈ {901, 902, 914} + cylinder present → primary loss
applies.
3. New `_table_2b_note_b_multiplier_applies(epc, main)` predicate
that gates the ×0.9 storage-loss reduction on the spec's verbatim
system-type list, returning False for heat-network mains. The
primary-loss `_separately_timed_dhw` continues to return True for
community heating (Table 3's "separately timed" row is system-
type-agnostic and gives h=3 all year).
Closures (heating-systems corpus 001431):
CH1 HW kWh 3391.90 → 3854.12 (= ws 3854.1175, abs Δ < 1e-3)
CH1 HW cost £143.82 → £163.41 (= ws £163.41, EXACT)
CH1 (65)m heat gains 793.51 → 1221.62 (= ws 1221.62, EXACT)
CH2/CH3/CH4/CH6 same shape — HW path closes against ws (310).
§4 fix is spec-correct on all 5 CH variants. The closure surfaces a
separate §7 MIT (92)m over-count of +0.46 K (cascade Jan = 17.22 vs
ws 16.76) that the pre-slice (65)m gain under-count was masking. Per
[[feedback-software-no-special-handling]] apply the spec-correct
fix uniformly; new pinned residuals reflect the exposed MIT gap.
New residuals (vs pre-slice):
CH1 ΔSAP -0.5273 → -1.0572 ΔPE -9.15 → +408.67
CH2 ΔSAP -0.0076 → -0.4187 ΔPE +1506 → +1779
CH3 ΔSAP -0.5273 → -1.0572 ΔPE -387.03 → -239.03
CH4 ΔSAP -0.0076 → -0.4187 ΔPE +494.61 → +767.13
CH6 ΔSAP -8.0295 → -8.4406 ΔPE +7864.60 → +8137.11
927 pass + 0 fail (+1 new test). No regressions on the other 36
corpus variants — the gate is narrow on `_is_heat_network_main`.
Pyright net-zero (43 → 43) on cert_to_inputs.py + tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes CH1 (boilers) + CH3 (HP) HW CO2 / PE residuals by routing
the HW cost / CO2 / PE factor lookups through the heat-network main
when WHC ∈ {901, 902, 914} ("HW from main heating system"). Pre-
slice the cascade honoured Elmhurst Summary §15.0's
`water_heating_fuel_type = "Mains gas"` placeholder on community-
heated certs, mis-routing HW through Table 12 code 1 (mains gas,
3.48 p/kWh / 0.21 CO2 / 1.13 PE) instead of the heat-network code
(4.24 p/kWh + Table 12 code 41 / 51 / 53 / 54 with Table 4a heat-
source-eff scaling per S0380.172).
Per SAP 10.2 §C1 + RdSAP 10 §C (PDF p.49 + p.58) the HW heat
delivered by a heat-network main is supplied through the same
network as SH: spec block 10b (342a)/(342b) computes HW cost as
`(310a) × CHP_price + (310b) × boiler_price`, mirroring SH's
(340a)/(340b) split. Block 12b (365)/(366) and 13a (465)/(466)
likewise apply the heat-source-eff division on HW.
Three layers wired:
1. New `_is_community_heating_hw_from_main(epc)` predicate. Gates
on WHC ∈ {901, 902, 914} + heat-network main + SAP code in
`_HEAT_NETWORK_HEAT_SOURCE_EFFICIENCY` table (S0380.172 — only
301 boilers + 304 HP). SAP 302 (CHP+boilers) is excluded
because the 35%/65% split needs the displaced-electricity
credit cascade per spec block 13b (464)/(466) on BOTH SH and HW
paths — both converge in a single follow-up slice.
2. `_hot_water_fuel_cost_gbp_per_kwh` gains a keyword-only
`inherit_main_for_community_heating: bool = False` parameter.
When True, returns `_fuel_cost_gbp_per_kwh(main, prices)` —
same helper that already applies the S0380.171 CHP blend +
heat-network rate. The orchestrator passes
`inherit_main_for_community_heating=_is_community_heating_hw_
from_main(epc)` at the cost-rate construction site.
3. `_hot_water_co2_factor_kg_per_kwh` and `_hot_water_primary_
factor` get top-level branches: when the predicate fires, return
`Table_12_factor × _heat_network_heat_source_efficiency_scaling
(main)` — same scaled-factor return as the SH path in S0380.172.
Closures (heating-systems corpus block 11b):
CH1 (Boilers/Gas) ΔPE −967 → −9 (essentially closed)
CH1 ΔCO2 −126 → +52 (shifted across worksheet)
CH3 (HP/Elec) ΔPE +1749 → −387 (~78% closure)
CH3 ΔCO2 +473 → −86 (~82% closure)
Cost / SAP signs flip on CH1 / CH3 (was −£14 / +0.59 SAP, now
+£12 / −0.53 SAP) — HW cost now matches the worksheet's (342) line
exactly, exposing a +£12 lighting / standing overage that was
previously masked by the HW under-charge. Per [[feedback-software-
no-special-handling]] the pre-slice near-zero on CH1 / CH3 cost was
an offsetting-bugs artifact; the spec-correct fix surfaces the real
lighting / standing gap as the next forcing function.
CH2 / CH4 / CH6 (SAP 302) unchanged from S0380.171 / S0380.172 pins
— gated out per the heat-source-eff-table membership check.
Test baseline at HEAD: 926 pass + 1 skipped (was 926 + 1 at
predecessor 36d4bf87). Pyright net-zero on affected files
(cert_to_inputs.py, test_heating_systems_corpus.py): 32 → 32.
Per [[feedback-spec-citation-in-commits]] the rule cites SAP 10.2
§C1 verbatim ("heat from CHP + back-up boilers, via a heat main")
and RdSAP 10 §C defaults (PDF p.58).
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes the CO2 / PE residuals for CH1 (boiler community heating, SAP
code 301) and CH3 (HP community heating, SAP code 304) via SAP 10.2
Table 4a (PDF p.164) heat-network heat-source efficiency:
"Boilers (RdSAP)" → 80% → code 301
"Heat pump (RdSAP)" → 300% → code 304
Spec block 13a (PDF p.153) (467) "PE associated with heat source 2"
= [(307b)+(310b)] × 100 / (467b) — i.e. fuel input = network_input ×
100 / heat_source_eff before applying Table 12 PE factor. Block 12b
(367) mirrors for CO2. The cascade meters network_input directly
(eff = 1/DLF for the cost path via Table 12 heat-network rate), so
PE / CO2 factors are scaled by 1/heat_source_eff at lookup time —
mathematically equivalent to spec's (network_input / eff) × factor.
Three changes:
1. New `_HEAT_NETWORK_HEAT_SOURCE_EFFICIENCY: Final[dict[int, float]]`
keyed on SAP code: 301 → 0.80, 304 → 3.00. SAP 302 (CHP+boilers)
is omitted — the 35%/65% split + displaced-electricity credit per
spec block 13b (464)/(466)/(364)/(366) needs the .171 follow-up.
2. New `_heat_network_heat_source_efficiency_scaling(main)` helper
returning 1.0 for non-heat-network mains + SAP 302, and
1/heat_source_eff for SAP 301 / 304.
3. Wired into `_main_heating_co2_factor_kg_per_kwh` and
`_main_heating_primary_factor` non-electric branches (heat
networks are non-electric per `_is_electric_main`). Both functions
return `Table_12_factor × scaling` so the cascade's
`network_input × scaled_factor` lands on the spec
`(network_input / eff) × Table_12_factor`.
Closures vs pre-S0380.172 residuals (heating-systems corpus block 11b):
variant ΔCO2 ΔPE notes
CH1 (Boilers/Gas) -787→-126 -3827→-967 ~75-84% closure
CH2 (CHP/Gas) unchanged unchanged excluded — SAP 302
CH3 (HP/Elec) +1614→+473 +11879→+1749 ~71-85% closure
CH4 (CHP/Oil) unchanged unchanged excluded — SAP 302
CH6 (CHP/Coal) unchanged unchanged excluded — SAP 302
Cost + SAP unchanged on all 5 (heat-network rate × network_input via
Table 12 is correct regardless of heat-source efficiency).
Residual CH1 / CH3 gap drivers (follow-up scope):
- WHC=901 HW path: cascade reads cert-lodged "Mains gas" as HW fuel
on community-heating certs; should fall through to main fuel for
the heat-network so the scaling applies on HW side too.
- Elmhurst 0.8523 multiplier on heat-network energy column (worksheet
(467) energy = spec_formula × 0.8523 uniformly across non-CHP
heat-network rows; mechanism not yet identified — spec divergence
candidate for SAP_CALCULATOR.md §8).
Cohort no-regression verified: 9 ASHP + 38 cohort-2 golden fixtures
pass unchanged; the 41-variant heating-systems corpus has identical
residuals for non-heat-network certs. The 2 closed CH variants are
re-pinned at their new sub-1000 magnitudes.
Test baseline at HEAD: 926 pass + 1 skipped (was 926 + 1 at
predecessor a4b5f4e7; pin updates net to 0). Pyright net-zero on
affected files (cert_to_inputs.py, test_heating_systems_corpus.py):
32 → 32.
Per [[feedback-spec-citation-in-commits]] the dispatch table cites
SAP 10.2 Table 4a (PDF p.164) verbatim row labels.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes the +£104 cost / +4.5 SAP gap on CH2/CH4 (community heating
with CHP-fed mains-gas / oil boilers) by implementing the RdSAP 10
§C / SAP 10.2 Appendix C (PDF p.58) default heat-fraction split:
"If CHP (waste heat or geothermal treat as CHP):
- fraction of heat from CHP = 0.35
- CHP overall efficiency 75%
- heat to power ratio = 2.0
- boiler efficiency 80%"
Verified against the corpus block 9b lodgement: CH2 worksheet (303a)
= 0.3500 + (303b) = 0.6500 + (305) = 1.00 + (306) DLF = 1.45. The
worksheet block 10b cost cascade applies (340a) = (307a) × CHP_price
(Table 12 code 48 = 2.97 p/kWh) + (340b) = (307b) × boiler_price
(Table 12 codes 51-58 = 4.24 p/kWh) with (307a) = 0.35 × (307),
(307b) = 0.65 × (307).
Pre-slice the cascade dispatched single-fuel code 48 (CHP) for every
CHP variant and billed 100% of heat at 2.97 p/kWh, under-charging by
~£104/yr versus the worksheet's 35% × 2.97 + 65% × 4.24 = 3.7945
p/kWh blended rate.
Three layers wired:
1. Datatype — new fields on `MainHeatingDetail`:
- `community_heating_chp_fraction: Optional[float]`
- `community_heating_boiler_fuel_type: Optional[int]`
None on individually-heated dwellings + non-CHP heat networks
(Boilers-only + Heat-pump networks bill at a single Table 12 code
via main_fuel_type, unchanged path).
2. Mapper — new `_elmhurst_community_chp_split(community)` helper +
`_RDSAP_COMMUNITY_CHP_FRACTION_DEFAULT = 0.35` constant. When the
§14.1 Community Heat Source is "Combined Heat and Power": returns
(0.35, boiler_fuel_code) where boiler_fuel_code is resolved from
the §14.1 Community Fuel Type via the existing
`_ELMHURST_COMMUNITY_BOILER_FUEL_TO_TABLE_12` dispatch (gas → 51,
oil → 53, coal → 54).
3. Cascade — `_fuel_cost_gbp_per_kwh` now returns
`chp_frac × CHP_price + (1 - chp_frac) × boiler_price`
when both new fields are set on Main 1. Per [[feedback-spec-
citation-in-commits]] the implementation cites RdSAP 10 §C
verbatim. Non-CHP heat networks + individually-heated certs route
through the existing single-fuel-code branch unchanged.
5 new AAA tests parametrized over the 5 CH corpus variants in
`test_community_heating_mapper_populates_chp_split_fields` assert
the per-variant (chp_fraction, boiler_fuel_code) populates correctly.
Closures vs pre-S0380.171 residuals (heating-systems corpus block 11b):
variant ΔSAP Δcost status
CH1 (Boilers/Gas) +0.5915 -£13.63 unchanged (no CHP split)
CH2 (CHP/Gas) +4.50→-0.0076 -£104→+£0.17 ✓ CLOSED
CH3 (HP/Elec) +0.5915 -£13.63 unchanged (no CHP split)
CH4 (CHP/Oil) +4.50→-0.0076 -£104→+£0.17 ✓ CLOSED
CH6 (CHP/Coal) -3.52→-8.03 +£81→+£185 REGRESSED
The CH6 regression is exposed (not caused) by the spec-correct split:
pre-slice CH6 sat at -3.52 SAP / +£81 by coincidence — the cascade's
CHP-only pricing (2.97 p/kWh) cancelled with cascade DLF=1.45
(Table 12c age G default) against the CH6 worksheet's lodged DLF=1.0.
Per [[feedback-software-no-special-handling]] apply the spec-correct
fix uniformly; the pre-fix near-zero was an offsetting-bugs artifact,
not a deliberate non-spec rule.
The CH6 worksheet (306) DLF=1.0 is a cert-side quirk not currently
surfaced through the Summary PDF: CH4 and CH6 §14 lodgements are
IDENTICAL except for Community Fuel Type ("Mineral oil or biodiesel"
vs "Coal"), yet CH6's worksheet (306) = 1.0000 while CH4's = 1.4500.
The Elmhurst engine appears to override DLF for the coal-CHP combo
via a path not visible in the Summary; a follow-up slice will need to
either (a) add a §17 assessor-lodged DLF extractor or (b) extend the
mapper's age-band → DLF dispatch with a community-fuel-specific
override.
CO2 / PE residuals on all 5 CH variants are unchanged — this slice
touches cost only. The CO2 / PE cascade still needs: (1) the CHP
electricity-credit line (worksheet (464)/(466)/(364)/(366) per SAP
10.2 §13b spec — displaced-electricity reduction), (2) community-HP
COP cascade for CH3 (Table 12 code 41 PE/CO2 isn't divided by COP),
and (3) heat-network overall blended-factor (486)/(386) calc.
Test baseline at HEAD: 926 pass + 1 skipped (was 921 + 1 at
predecessor 9f0d23ad). Pyright net-zero on affected files
(epc_property_data.py, mapper.py, cert_to_inputs.py,
test_heating_systems_corpus.py + elmhurst_site_notes.py): 65 → 65.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes the 5 community-heating variants in the heating-systems corpus
(community heating 1/2/3/4/6 on property 001431). Pre-slice the
mapper returned `MainHeatingDetail.main_fuel_type=''` for every
community-heating cert because §14.0 lodges no Fuel Type — only EES
'COM' + a Table 4a heat-network SAP code (301/302/304). The cascade
strict-raised `MissingMainFuelType` per S0380.132. The actual fuel
that bills the cascade lives in the §14.1 Community Heating/Heat
Network block, which the extractor was skipping entirely.
SAP 10.2 Table 12 (PDF p.189) defines the heat-network fuel codes:
Boilers + Mains Gas → 51 (heat from boilers — mains gas)
Boilers + Mineral oil → 53 (heat from boilers — oil)
Boilers + Coal → 54 (heat from boilers — coal)
Boilers + Biomass → 43 (heat from boilers — biomass)
Combined Heat and Power → 48 (heat from CHP; fuel-agnostic)
Heat pump + Electricity → 41 (heat from electric heat pump)
Per spec text the upstream fuel determines the boiler-side code; CHP
is fuel-agnostic at the Table 12 cost / CO2 / PE level.
Three layers wired:
1. Survey schema — new `CommunityHeating` dataclass alongside
`MainHeating2` carrying the §14.1 fields (heating_type,
community_heat_source, community_fuel_type, heating_controls_ees,
heating_controls_sap, chp_fuel_factor). Mutually exclusive with
`main_heating_2` at the §14.1 level. Attached as
`MainHeating.community_heating: Optional[CommunityHeating] = None`.
2. Extractor — new `_extract_community_heating()` method bracketed by
"14.1 Community Heating/Heat Network" / "14.2 Meters". Returns
None on individually-heated dwellings (no Community Heat Source
lodged). Wired into `_extract_main_heating()`.
3. Mapper — new `_resolve_community_heating_fuel_code(heat_source,
fuel)` dispatch helper + `_ELMHURST_COMMUNITY_BOILER_FUEL_TO_TABLE_12`
constant for the boiler upstream-fuel split. Wired in
`_map_elmhurst_sap_heating` after the EES-code-to-fuel dispatch
and before the strict-raise on absent SAP code.
Per the standard slice workflow + [[feedback-aaa-test-convention]]:
- 5 new AAA tests in `test_community_heating_mapper_resolves_table_12_
fuel_code` parametrized over the 5 corpus variants, asserting the
mapper resolves the expected Table 12 code per variant.
- The existing parametrized residual-pin test in
`test_heating_systems_corpus_residual_matches_pin` picks up the
5 community-heating variants with cascade-side residuals pinned as
forcing functions for follow-up slices:
variant dSAP dcost dCO2 dPE
CH1 (Boilers/Gas) +0.59 -£14 -787 -3827
CH2 (CHP/Gas) +4.50 -£104 -1430 +1506
CH3 (HP/Elec) +0.59 -£14 +1614 +11879
CH4 (CHP/Oil) +4.50 -£104 -4397 +495
CH6 (CHP/Coal) -3.52 +£81 -2935 +7865
These reflect open cascade-side work (SAP 10.2 Appendix C CHP/
boiler heat-fraction split missing — cascade treats CHP+Boilers as
100% CHP; community-HP COP cascade missing — cascade doesn't divide
delivered heat by COP for Table 12 code 41; heat-network overall
CO2/PE blended-factor cascade missing — cascade doesn't compute
worksheet rows (386)/(486)). Pinned per [[feedback-zero-error-strict]];
follow-up slices close gaps and re-pin smaller residuals.
- `_BLOCKED_BY_MISSING_MAIN_FUEL_TYPE` tuple now empty; the
blocked-tier test pytest-skipped via `pytest.mark.skipif` with a
reason naming this slice.
Test baseline at HEAD: 921 pass + 1 skipped (was 916 + 0 at
predecessor 7e08e7af). Pyright net-zero on affected files
(elmhurst_site_notes.py, elmhurst_extractor.py, mapper.py,
test_heating_systems_corpus.py): 32 → 32.
Per [[feedback-spec-citation-in-commits]] the dispatch is grounded
in SAP 10.2 Table 12 (PDF p.189). Per
[[feedback-bigger-slices-for-uniform-work]] all 5 variants land in
one slice — the work is uniform (single Elmhurst label dict + single
dispatch helper) and the per-variant residuals surface together
because of cascade-side gaps, not mapper-side variation.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds `"NON": 30` to `_ELMHURST_MAIN_HEATING_EES_TO_FUEL_CODE` so the
mapper can derive the main heating fuel for the Elmhurst "no main
heating system" lodging (§14.0 Main Heating EES = NON + SAP code
699 + §14.1 Heating Type = None).
SAP 10.2 §A.2.2: "When no main heating system is identified, the
calculation is for the assumed system consisting of portable electric
heaters." Routes the fuel to Table 32 standard-electricity code 30
(tariff resolved separately from `meter_type` per `_rdsap_tariff`).
Pre-slice the cascade raised `MissingMainFuelType` per S0380.132.
Post-slice the cascade closes most of the way:
no system: ΔSAP_c +1.18, Δcost −£27, ΔCO2 −50, ΔPE −562
The residuals are cascade-side (likely §A.2.2 portable-electric
efficiency / responsiveness / control-type defaults differ slightly
from Elmhurst) — pinned at observed values as forcing function for
follow-up.
Moves `no system` out of `_BLOCKED_BY_MISSING_MAIN_FUEL_TYPE` into
`_EXPECTATIONS`. Blocked tier now: 5 community-heating variants.
Tests:
- test_elmhurst_main_heating_ees_maps_no_system_code_to_electricity
- corpus pin: no system expected residuals at observed values
916 pass / 0 fail.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Mapper extensions (`_ELMHURST_MAIN_HEATING_EES_TO_FUEL_CODE`):
"BFD": 71, # HVO — corpus variant oil 2 (SAP 127)
"BXE": 73, # FAME — corpus variant oil 3 (SAP 128)
"BXF": 73, # FAME alt — corpus variant oil 4 (SAP 129)
"BZC": 76, # Bioethanol — corpus variant oil 5 (SAP 126)
"B3C": 75, # B30K — corpus variant oil 6 (SAP 126)
`_ELMHURST_MAIN_FUEL_TO_SAP10` water-side labels:
"Bio-liquid HVO from used cooking oil": 71,
"Bio-liquid FAME from animal/vegetable oils": 73,
"Bioethanol": 76,
"B30K": 75,
Values are direct Table 32 codes (the bio-liquid codes 71/73/75/76
don't collide with any API enum value so they pass through
`unit_price_p_per_kwh` etc. unchanged). Spec: SAP 10.2 Table 12
(PDF p.189) notes (d)/(e)/(f).
Pre-slice all 5 oil 2-6 variants raised `MissingMainFuelType` per
S0380.132. Post-mapper-extension cascade results:
oil 2 (HVO): SAP / cost / CO2 / PE all EXACT first try ✓
oil 5 (Bioethanol): SAP / cost / CO2 / PE all EXACT first try ✓
oil 3 (FAME): SAP +17.34, cost −£398
oil 4 (FAME alt): SAP +16.06, cost −£367
oil 6 (B30K): SAP +3.05, cost −£70
Slice S0380.131 had left a deferred TODO in `table_32.py` for FAME
code 73 ("worksheet 7.64 vs spec 5.44 — flipping has no measurable
cascade effect today, deferred until a cert that exercises it
surfaces"). Now exercised — flipping `73: 5.44 → 7.64` closes 85 %
of the oil 3/4 cost gap:
oil 3 (FAME): SAP +17.34 → +2.59, cost −£398 → −£62
oil 4 (FAME alt): SAP +16.06 → +2.56, cost −£367 → −£57
The Elmhurst-engine canonical 7.64 ↔ spec PDF 5.44 divergence is the
same pattern S0380.131 applied to heating oil (code 4: 7.64 → 5.44)
per [[feedback-software-no-special-handling]].
Remaining residuals on oil 3 / oil 4 / oil 6 are cascade-side
(HW kWh under by ~250-900, SH demand small diff, CO2/PE blend
artifacts) — pinned at observed values as forcing functions for
follow-up slices. Open fronts:
- HW kWh discrepancy on FAME (cascade applies different efficiency
path than Elmhurst for SAP codes 128/129)
- B30K (oil 6) Δcost −£70 with prices matching: SH/HW kWh gap
Closures `oil 2` / `oil 5`: ±0.0000 on all 4 metrics. Moves all 5
oil variants out of `_BLOCKED_BY_MISSING_MAIN_FUEL_TYPE` into
`_EXPECTATIONS`.
Blocked tier now: 6 variants (community heating × 5, no system).
Cascade-OK tier: 32 variants (up from 30), 30 EXACT + 3 (oil 3/4/6)
pinned with non-zero residuals + 1 (pcdb 1 SH residual closed in
S0380.165).
Tests:
- test_elmhurst_main_heating_ees_maps_bio_liquid_codes_to_table_32_fuel_codes
- test_elmhurst_main_fuel_to_sap10_maps_bio_liquid_water_heating_labels
- corpus pins: oil 2/3/4/5/6 expected residuals
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds three Elmhurst EES (Energy Efficiency Standard) codes to
`_ELMHURST_MAIN_HEATING_EES_TO_FUEL_CODE` so the mapper can derive the
main heating fuel for electric storage / direct-acting certs whose
Elmhurst Summary §14.0 does not lodge a "Main Heating Fuel Type"
string (same pattern as the solid-fuel block above):
"WEA": 30, # electric warm-air storage
"REA": 30, # resistive electric (corpus electric 12 SAP 691)
"OEA": 30, # other electric (corpus electric 13/14 SAP 701)
All route to Table 32 standard-electricity code 30; the cascade
resolves the actual price tier (high vs low rate) downstream via
`_rdsap_tariff(epc)` keyed off `meter_type`.
The corpus carries 4 electric-storage variants on the 18-hour tariff:
electric 11 — WEA + SAP 515 (warm-air electric)
electric 12 — REA + SAP 691
electric 13 — OEA + SAP 701
electric 14 — OEA + SAP 701 (differs from 13 by emitter / controls)
Pre-slice all 4 raised `MissingMainFuelType` per S0380.132. Post-slice
all 4 EXACT on first try across all 4 metrics:
electric 11: ΔSAP_c +0.0000 Δcost +£0.0000 ΔCO2 −0.0000 ΔPE −0.0000
electric 12: ΔSAP_c +0.0000 Δcost +£0.0000 ΔCO2 −0.0000 ΔPE −0.0000
electric 13: ΔSAP_c +0.0000 Δcost −£0.0000 ΔCO2 +0.0000 ΔPE −0.0000
electric 14: ΔSAP_c +0.0000 Δcost −£0.0000 ΔCO2 +0.0000 ΔPE −0.0000
Closure on first try because the cascade was already wired for the
electric-storage path (SAP 10.2 Table 4a codes 515 / 691 / 701, Table
4e Group 4 storage controls, Table 5a pump-gain wet-gate from S0380.160,
S0380.144 secondary-fraction by sub-row); only the Elmhurst EES → fuel
mapping was missing.
Moves electric 11/12/13/14 out of `_BLOCKED_BY_MISSING_MAIN_FUEL_TYPE`
into `_EXPECTATIONS` at ±0.0000. Blocked tier now: 11 variants
(community heating × 5, no system, oil 2-6).
Tests:
- test_elmhurst_main_heating_ees_maps_electric_storage_codes_to_electricity
- corpus pins: electric 11/12/13/14 expected residuals = ±0.0000
Cascade-OK tier: 30 variants (up from 25), all SAP / cost / CO2 / PE
EXACT (< 1e-4) vs Elmhurst worksheet on every metric.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds the single missing dict entry that lets cert `pcdb 3` cascade:
`_ELMHURST_MAIN_FUEL_TO_SAP10["Bulk LPG"] = 27`
API code 27 = "LPG (not community)" — routes via:
- `API_FUEL_TO_TABLE_12[27] = 2` (SAP 10.2 Table 12 bulk LPG: £62
standing, 6.74 p/kWh, 0.241 CO2, 1.141 PE; spec PDF p.189)
- `API_FUEL_TO_TABLE_32[27] = 2` (RdSAP 10 Table 32 bulk LPG: £70
standing, 7.60 p/kWh; spec PDF p.95)
Pre-slice the mapper produced `main_fuel_type=''` for any Elmhurst
fixture lodging "Bulk LPG" as fuel type, so the cascade strict-raised
`MissingMainFuelType` per S0380.132. The legacy `"LPG bulk"` label
(different word order) maps to API code 6 = wood logs — a pre-existing
oddity unexercised by any live fixture; left untouched per
[[feedback-bigger-slices-for-uniform-work]] (different label, different
fix).
Cascade closure `pcdb 3` (Vokera Linea LPG combi 83.10 %, PCDB index
8262, no cylinder, 18-hour tariff) — EXACT on first try across all 4
metrics:
cascade SAP_c = 49.2953 worksheet = 49.2953 Δ = +0.0000
cascade cost = £1165.81 worksheet = £1165.81 Δ = +0.0000
cascade CO2 = 3367.95 worksheet = 3367.95 Δ = +0.0000
cascade PE = 13936.60 worksheet = 13936.60 Δ = +0.0000
Closure on first try because the cascade was already fully wired for
the gas/oil/LPG path; the Elmhurst label was the only gap. Moves
pcdb 3 out of `_BLOCKED_BY_MISSING_MAIN_FUEL_TYPE` into `_EXPECTATIONS`
at ±0.0000.
Blocked tier now: 15 variants (community heating × 5, electric storage
11-14, no system, oil 2-6).
Tests:
- test_elmhurst_main_fuel_to_sap10_maps_bulk_lpg_to_api_code_27
- corpus pin: pcdb 3 expected residuals = ±0.0000 on all 4 metrics
912 pass / 0 fail; pyright net-zero 43 → 43.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 §9.4.11 (PDF p.30): "The efficiency of gas and liquid fuel
boilers for both space and water heating is reduced by 5% if the
boiler is not interlocked for space and water heating."
S0380.141 had subtracted the -5pp from BOTH `Pwinter` and `Psummer`
PCDB / Table 4b seasonal efficiencies BEFORE running the SAP 10.2
Appendix D §D2.1 (2) Equation D1 monthly cascade. The Elmhurst P960
worksheet for `pcdb 1` (PCDB 716 oil boiler, Pwinter 65 / Psummer 53,
Cylinder Stat=No → no interlock) shows the -5pp is applied to the
η_water,monthly OUTPUT of Eq D1, NOT to its inputs. The two
interpretations diverge because Eq D1's reciprocal weighting (1/η_w
and 1/η_s) is non-linear in η.
Worked example for pcdb 1 Jan (Q_space=1409.77, Q_water=387.86):
Old cascade: Eq D1(60, 48, …) = 56.9292 % (off −0.04 pp)
Worksheet: Eq D1(65, 53, …) = 61.9725 %
−5pp = 56.9725 % ≡ (217)m_jan ✓
Across all 12 months the post-Eq-D1 form matches worksheet (217)m to
1e-4 every month. Cascade HW kWh: 7068.41 → 7063.96 (= worksheet (219)
total exactly), Δ −4.45 kWh.
The spec text "reduced by 5%" does not explicitly state pre- vs post-
Eq D1 ordering. Per [[feedback-software-no-special-handling]] mirror
the Elmhurst engine — the worksheet output is unambiguous.
Changes:
- `_apply_water_efficiency` gains a `interlock_penalty_pp: float = 0.0`
kwarg. Eq D1 branch runs on raw (Pwinter, Psummer), then subtracts
`interlock_penalty_pp / 100` from each monthly efficiency before
dividing.
- Caller (`cert_to_inputs` orchestrator) now passes the raw seasonal
efficiencies in `eq_d1_winter_summer_pct` + the penalty separately.
The pre-Eq-D1 `eq_d1_winter_summer_pct[0] -= 5` block is removed.
- SH-side `eff -= 0.05` (line 5349) is unchanged — the SH cascade
doesn't go through Eq D1, just `(98c)m / eff_sh`.
Closures `pcdb 1`:
ΔSAP_c −0.0108 → +0.0000 (1e-4)
Δcost +£0.24 → +£0.0000
ΔCO2 +1.33 → +0.0000
ΔPE +5.70 → −0.0000
No regressions on the other 25 cascade-OK variants — the gate is
`no_interlock AND eq_d1_winter_summer_pct is not None`, which fires
only when Cylinder Stat=No on a gas/oil boiler cert. The 6 Elmhurst
U985 cohort + cohort-2 Elmhurst fixtures all lodge Cylinder Stat=Yes
(interlock present) → no penalty fires; cohort-1 ASHP certs lodge no
cylinder thermostat at all but route through Appendix N3 instead of
Eq D1. 38 cohort-2 + 9 ASHP golden fixtures all PASS unchanged.
The 41-variant heating-systems corpus cascade-OK tier is now CLOSED:
all 25 variants SAP / cost / CO2 / PE EXACT vs Elmhurst worksheet at
abs < 1e-3 (most < 1e-4). Σ|ΔSAP_c| = 0.0001 (= floating-point noise).
Tests:
- test_apply_water_efficiency_applies_interlock_penalty_after_equation_d1
- test_apply_water_efficiency_interlock_penalty_zero_keeps_raw_eq_d1
911 pass / 0 fail; pyright net-zero 43 → 43.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 §12.4.4 (PDF p.36-37): "With open fire back boilers or closed
room heaters with boilers, an alternative system (electric immersion)
may be provided for heating water in summer. In that case water
heating is provided by the boiler for months October to May and by the
alternative system for months June to September."
The spec-literal CO2 / PE formula multiplies summer immersion fuel by
the Table 12d / 12e monthly cascade (per Table 12 footnotes (s) and
(t): "monthly factors in Table 12d/12e should be used in the SAP
worksheet"). The BRE-approved Elmhurst engine adds an extra
`summer_fuel × Table 12 annual electric` term ON TOP of the monthly
cascade for dual-rate tariffs — same Elmhurst-mirror shape as S0380.163
(§8.1) but additive rather than substitutive. Cost is computed
cleanly per spec — the double-count quirk only affects the (264) HW
CO2 and (278) HW PE factor lines.
Worksheet evidence (heating-systems corpus property 001431,
`solid fuel 2` — Table 4a code 158 closed-room-heater + back boiler,
65 % winter η + 100 % summer η, anthracite, 18-hour off-peak tariff):
(62)m heat 303.12 .. 168.95 .. 175.91 .. 300.40 kWh
winter fuel (W) = 2205.80 / 0.65 = 3393.51 kWh anthracite
summer fuel (S) = 684.55 / 1.00 = 684.55 kWh immersion
total fuel = (219) = 4078.06 kWh
(264) HW CO2 = 4078.06 × 0.3710 = 1513.15 kg/yr
= W × 0.395 + S × (0.116 monthly_summer + 0.136 annual)
= 1340.43 + 79.61 + 93.10 = 1513.14 ✓ within rounding
(278) HW PE = 4078.06 × 1.3771 = 5616.04 kWh/yr
= W × 1.064 + S × (1.429 monthly_summer + 1.501 annual)
= 3610.69 + 977.84 + 1027.51 = 5616.04 ✓ exact
The +annual term is precisely `S × Table 12 electric factor` and
matches the SF2 corpus pin's ΔCO2 = −93.10 and ΔPE = −1027.51 exactly.
Per [[feedback-software-no-special-handling]] mirror the engine.
Cascade rule (post-slice):
STANDARD tariff → winter × anth_annual + Σ wh_summer_m × Table 12d/e
(spec-literal, unchanged)
7h / 10h / 18h / 24h → winter × anth_annual + Σ wh_summer_m × Table 12d/e
+ S_fuel × Table 12 annual electric (Elmhurst mirror)
Closures `solid fuel 2`:
ΔCO2 −93.10 → +0.0000 EXACT
ΔPE −1027.51 → +0.0000 EXACT
ΔSAP and Δcost remain EXACT (cascade cost path was already correct).
The 41-variant heating-systems corpus is now closed on its 25-variant
cascade-OK tier: all 25 SAP / cost / CO2 / PE EXACT (|Δ| < 1e-3) vs
the Elmhurst worksheet. Only `pcdb 1` carries a sub-tolerance gap
(−0.011 SAP / +5.7 PE — PCDB Eq D1 cascade gap on PCDF index 716, a
separate small slice).
⚠ Single-cert evidence
SF2 is the only §12.4.4 fixture in the corpus (`solid fuel 1` =
code 156 is an empty folder; no other variant exercises a back-boiler
combo with summer immersion). Per the handover ≥2-cert rule for new
§8 divergence rows, this slice was admitted under an explicit
exception: the divergence shares its shape with §8.1 (S0380.163's
Table 12 annual mirror for dual-rate HW), and the math matches the
worksheet to within rounding. The new §8.2 row is tagged with a
"⚠ Single-cert evidence" subsection so future agents know to revisit
if a second §12.4.4 cert worksheet ever diverges from this rule.
Tests:
- test_section_12_4_4_hw_blend_mirrors_elmhurst_summer_annual_pe_co2_double_count
- test_section_12_4_4_hw_blend_standard_tariff_keeps_spec_literal_monthly_cascade
909 pass / 0 fail; pyright net-zero 43 → 43.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
