The SAP/EI rating is computed on UK-average weather (Appendix U Tables
U1-U3 region 0) so ratings are nationally comparable, but Appendix U
paragraph 1 (PDF p.124) requires that "other calculations (such as for
energy use and costs on EPCs) are done using local weather. Weather data
for each postcode district are taken from the PCDB". `Sap10Calculator.
calculate` ran ONE cascade (UK-average) and fed it to SAP, CO2 AND primary
energy, so every cert's EPC-displayed CO2/PE were computed on the wrong
climate. Because most of England is warmer than the UK-average, this
systematically OVER-counted heating demand on the emissions/PE outputs.
The two cascades (`cert_to_inputs` rating, `cert_to_demand_inputs`
postcode) already existed; this wires the demand cascade into the
production entry point and grafts its CO2/PE onto the rating result (SAP
unchanged). The corpus gauge's longstanding +5% CO2/PE over-estimate was
mostly this climate bug, NOT (as previously diagnosed) per-cert mapper
fidelity:
CO2 MAE 0.26 -> 0.12 t/yr (bias +0.18 -> +0.04)
PE MAE 13.6 -> 3.8 kWh/m2 (bias +9.0 -> +0.24)
SAP within-0.5 = 69.7% (rating cascade, unchanged)
Worksheet-validated to 1e-4 on simulated case 45 (heat-pump ground-floor
flat, postcode W6): the P960 prints the current dwelling twice — Block 1
on UK-average weather (SAP 60.5318, CO2 692.13) and Block 2 on postcode
weather (CO2 626.78, PE 6581.59). Both reproduce exactly. Added a tracked
case-45 Summary fixture + two-cascade cascade pin as a permanent guard,
and ratcheted the corpus CO2/PE ceilings to 0.13 / 4.2. The e2e Elmhurst
suite (Block-1 line refs) now pins the rating cascade directly; the two
Vaillant overlay snapshots refreshed to demand-cascade CO2/PE.
pyright not installed in this codespace (strict gate not run locally);
change is type-trivial (dataclasses.replace over SapResult).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 §2 (17)-(18): a measured/design air permeability at 50 Pa from a
Blower Door test routes infiltration via `(18) = AP50/20 + (8)`, in
preference to the components-based (16) estimate. The Elmhurst extractor
read only the AP4 ("Pulse") column of §12.2, so a Blower Door result
(§12.2 "Pressure Test Result (AP50)") fell through to the structural-
infiltration default — over-counting ventilation heat loss.
Surfaced by simulated case 44 (AP50 4.50): effective air change rate was
0.81 vs the worksheet's 0.58 (+38% ventilation loss). The cascade already
supports `air_permeability_ap50` (preferred over AP4); this wires the read
end to end (extractor → ElmhurstSiteNotes → SapVentilation → cert_to_inputs).
Pinned against the case-44 P960 §2 at abs=1e-4: (18) infiltration 0.3417
(= 4.5/20 + 0.1167) and (25) Jan effective ach 0.5812. Worksheet harness
stays 47/47 0-raised.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Wire the non-separated conservatory into the §3 heat-transmission +
§1 dimensions cascade per RdSAP 10 §6.1 (PDF p.49) + Table 25 (p.51):
"The floor area and volume of a non-separated conservatory are added to
the total floor area and volume of the dwelling. Its roof area is taken
as its floor area divided by cos(20°), and wall area is taken as the
product of its exposed perimeter and its height. ... The conservatory
walls and roof are taken as fully glazed ... Glazed walls are taken as
windows, glazed roof as rooflight."
New `worksheet/conservatory.py` derives the geometry:
- height from the equivalent storey count (§6.1: 1 storey → ground-floor
room height; 1½ → ground + 0.25 + 0.5×first; etc.);
- glazed WALL → window (27) at Table 25 U (double 3.1 / single 4.8) with
the §3.2 curtain resistance (R=0.04) → U_eff 2.758;
- glazed ROOF → rooflight (27a) at Table 25 roof U (double 3.4 / single
5.3) + curtain → U_eff 2.993;
- FLOOR → (28a) via BS EN ISO 13370 as an uninsulated SOLID ground floor
with 300 mm walls (§5.12, spec p.43), exposed perimeter = glazed
perimeter → U 0.89;
- glazed wall + roof + floor areas join (31)/(36); the fully-glazed
structure walls/roof add nothing (the glazing IS the window/rooflight).
`dimensions_from_cert` adds the conservatory floor area to TFA (4) and
floor area × height to volume (5) (feeds ventilation (8)), without making
it a storey (avg storey height for §2 infiltration is unchanged).
Pinned against the simulated case-44 P960 §3 at abs=1e-4 — every line ref
EXACT: (4) 95.3800, (5) 257.1630, (27) 96.1169, (27a) 38.2201, (28a)
21.4164, (29a) 35.5852, (30) 7.4688, (31) 294.2900, (33) 207.3274,
(36) 23.5432. The remaining whole-dwelling SAP/CO2 gap is the §6 solar
gains, closed in the next slice. Worksheet harness stays 47/47 0-raised.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
RdSAP 10 §6.1 (PDF p.49) models a non-separated (heated) conservatory as
part of the dwelling. Until now the Summary §5 block was reduced to an
inert `has_conservatory` bool and the geometry (floor area, glazed
perimeter, glazing, storey height) was dropped on both paths.
Plumbing only — no cascade consumer yet (Slices B/C/D wire §3/§6):
- ElmhurstSiteNotesExtractor reads the §5 Conservatory block into a new
`Conservatory` site-notes record (scoped to §5 so the generic
"Floor Area"/"Room Height" labels can't collide with §4 dimensions);
- domain gains a frozen `SapConservatory` (floor area, glazed perimeter,
double/single glazing, thermally-separated guard, equivalent storey
count) on `EpcPropertyData.sap_conservatory`;
- the Elmhurst mapper threads it through, dropping SEPARATED
conservatories per §6.2 ("A separated conservatory ... is disregarded").
Verified against the simulated case-44 Summary (RefNo 001431): extracts
floor_area=12.0, glazed_perimeter=9.0, double_glazed=True, 1 storey.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Golden regression fixture for the multi-feature dwelling that surfaced the
two Elmhurst-extractor bugs in a33707f8. case 43 is a 2-BP mid-terrace with
a DETAILED room-in-roof (two slopes, two flat ceilings, party + exposed
gables, two common walls), a MIXED-insulation multi-section roof (Main
insulated + Extension uninsulated 2.30), a DRY-LINED extension solid wall,
a mains-gas boiler (102 / control 2106) and a House-coal solid-fuel
secondary (633).
Routes the Summary PDF through the WHOLE extractor + mapper + calculator
pipeline (no hand-built EpcPropertyData) and pins the §3 fabric + SAP-rating
block at abs=1e-4: (29a) walls 74.5800, (30) roof 38.5008, (33) fabric
172.7844, continuous SAP 73.2332 = (258), CO2 3518.3037 = (272). Guards the
detailed-RR slope/common_wall surfaces, the dry-lining R=0.17 adjustment,
and the per-part mixed-roof billing together. Summary mirrored to
backend/documents_parser/tests/fixtures/Summary_001431_case43.pdf; provider
module mirrors the _case6/_case21 pattern, assertion in
test_section_cascade_pins. Harness 47/47; regression = the 3 pre-existing
fails; pyright net-zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two compensating Summary-extractor bugs surfaced by simulated case 43 (a
2-BP mid-terrace with a detailed room-in-roof + a dry-lined extension wall).
Their fabric errors nearly cancelled (walls net −0.76 W/K), hiding both
behind a deceptively small +0.05 SAP delta.
Bug 1 — main/extension wall dry-lining never read. The §7 "Dry-lining:
Yes/No" line was parsed only for ALTERNATIVE walls; the main/extension
WallDetails dropped it, so a dry-lined solid wall was billed at its
un-adjusted base U. RdSAP 10 §5.8 + Table 14: a dry-lined uninsulated wall
adds R=0.17 → U = 1/(1/U_base + 0.17). Case 43 Ext1: solid brick 1.70 →
1.32. Added `WallDetails.dry_lined`, read it in the extractor (both the
main-wall builder and the As-Main copy), threaded it to the domain
`wall_dry_lined` (emit None when undried — cascade-equivalent to False,
keeps the field absent for the non-dry-lined majority).
Bug 2 — the LAST room-in-roof surface row's U over-read. The per-row token
scan stops at the next RIR-row name; the final surface (no successor) over-
read into the following section, shifting the trailing-token slotting and
silently zeroing its `default_u` (case 43 Common Wall 2: 1.90 → 0.00 → the
2.4 m² common wall billed at U=0 instead of the main-wall 1.90). Stop the
scan at the row's natural end — the "Yes"/"No" u_value_known flag plus the
trailing u_value numeric.
Case 43 now reproduces the P960 EXACTLY: (29a) walls 74.5800, (33) fabric
172.7844, continuous SAP 73.2332 = (258), CO2 3518.30 = (272), all <1e-4
(was SAP +0.0455 / CO2 −8.04). Harness 47/47 0 raised; regression = the 3
pre-existing fails; pyright net-zero (51=51).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`u_roof` only implemented the joist column, so roofs lodged insulated at
rafters (`roof_insulation_location == 1`) were mis-billed at the joist U
on both the API and Summary paths — under-stating loss, over-rating SAP.
RdSAP 10 §5.11.2 Table 16 (spec p.42-43) gives a distinct "insulation at
rafters" column (2): the rafter cavity is shallower than a loft void, so
the same depth yields a higher U (200 mm: rafters 0.29 vs joists 0.21).
§5.11 Table 18 (p.45) likewise carries a rafters column (2) for unknown /
as-built thickness (footnote (1): "The value from the table applies for
unknown and as built") — band A-D = 2.30, E = 1.50, F = 0.68, diverging
from the joist column's 100 mm-equivalent 0.40 default (footnote (4)).
- add `_ROOF_RAFTERS_BY_THICKNESS` (Table 16 col 2) + `_ROOF_RAFTERS_BY_AGE`
(Table 18 col 2) to rdsap_uvalues; `u_roof` selects them via a new
`insulation_at_rafters` flag (ignored for flat / sloping-ceiling roofs).
- `heat_transmission` derives the flag PER BUILDING PART from
`roof_insulation_location` (gov-API int 1 / Summary "R Rafters"), which
also fixes the multi-part dedup-roof-join problem: each part's own
location now drives its U, replacing the unattributable joined
`epc.roofs[]` description.
Worksheet-validated to 1e-4: simulated case 41 (4-bp — Ext1 rafters 200mm
→ 0.29, Ext3 rafters As-Built band F → 0.68; roof total 24.8350) and case
42 (6 variants — rafters 50mm → 0.88, rafters unknown band C → 2.30,
joists/none unchanged). Case 40 stays exact (roof 35.340, total 441.1606);
worksheet harness 47/47.
Corpus within-0.5 66.9% → 66.5% (gates 0.65/1.08 hold) — a spec-correct
shift, NOT a regression: all 15 corpus rafter certs carry redacted (None)
thickness yet lodge roof EER 2-4 (insulated), so the open API blanked a
specified thickness and the spec's unknown-rafter 2.30 default correctly
over-states them. Recovery needs a roof-EER→thickness inference on the
API path (follow-up), not a change to the U-table.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Elmhurst Summary §15.1 lodges "Cylinder Size: Value known" with the
measured volume in the "Cylinder Volume (l)" line — the Summary-path
equivalent of the gov-API "Exact" descriptor. The mapper had no entry for
"Value known" so `_elmhurst_cylinder_size_code` raised UnmappedElmhurstLabel,
and even once mapped the measured volume was never threaded through, so the
cascade dropped the cylinder storage loss (~468 kWh/yr) from (219) water
heating on every measured-volume-cylinder Summary.
Per RdSAP 10 §10.5 Table 28 (p.55) a measured cylinder volume is used
directly. Map "Value known" → cascade code 6 (Exact) and thread the §15.1
"Cylinder Volume (l)" value into SapHeating.cylinder_volume_measured_l, which
`_cylinder_volume_l_from_code` (cert_to_inputs.py:5281) already reads for
code 6 — mirroring the gov-API path (mapper.py:1575/1885).
Pins simulated case 39 (P960-0001-001431): an age-A mid-terrace on direct-
acting electric room heaters (SAP code 691, cat 10, control 2602) with
electric-immersion DHW off a 117 L "Value known" cylinder. The full
extractor→mapper→calculator cascade now reproduces the worksheet's SAP-rating
block EXACTLY — SAP value 36.6365 (band F) and (272) CO2 2056.0731 kg/yr,
with (219) water heating 2637.5049 and (255) total energy cost 1802.0039.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The realistic re-generation of case 37 (code-117 gas boiler, control 2102,
+ a MAINS-GAS condensing gas-fire secondary code 611, vs case 37's biogas
605). The full extractor -> mapper -> calculator pipeline reproduces the
worksheet's SAP-rating block EXACTLY: continuous SAP 60.9152 (Δ 2e-5) and
(272) CO2 5801.0770 (Δ ~0). This confirms the boiler-efficiency /
control-2102 −5pp interlock / secondary-fuel handling are all correct, and
that case 37's +7 gap was purely the biogas sub-fuel the Summary export
cannot carry.
Summary mirrored into backend/documents_parser/tests/fixtures so the pin
runs without the unstaged workspace. PE not pinned — it is a separate
DPER block (different scope) already guarded by the corpus PE gauge.
Worksheet harness 47/47 unchanged; pyright net-zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The §11 layout parser keys a window's wall Location on the glazing-prefix /
orientation tokens around its data row. An alt-wall window lodges its
"Alternative wall 1" Location wrapped across the lines bracketing the W×H×A
row. For a DOUBLE-glazed alt window the prefix line also carries the glazing
phrase ("Double between 2002 Alternative wall"), so the partition breaks
there and the location survives into the window's pre-data slice. For a
SINGLE-glazed alt window the "Alternative wall" line stands alone with no
glazing-type word, so _partition_after_manuf scanned past it and swallowed
it into the PREVIOUS window's suffix — the window then defaulted to
"External wall" and its opening deducted from the wrong wall.
Fix: treat a standalone wall-location line ("Alternative wall" / "External
wall" / "Party wall") as a window boundary in _partition_after_manuf, so it
attaches to the following window's prefix. Surfaced by simulated case 34
(cert 001431 electric-storage flat): 2 of 4 single-glazed alt-wall windows
were mis-allocated, splitting 2.75/10.78 m² instead of the worksheet's
4.63/8.90 corridor/external opening areas.
Elmhurst-extractor only; API gauge unaffected. Regression gate green (3
pre-existing fails unrelated); worksheet harness 47/47 unchanged. Case 34's
alt-wall opening area now matches the worksheet; the corridor wall net area
is correct (the cert's residual is now isolated to the unheated-corridor
door, a separate slice).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Elmhurst Summary §7 lodges "Alternative Wall N Sheltered Wall: Yes" for
a sub-area adjacent to an unheated buffer (e.g. a flat's corridor wall),
but the extractor dropped it and _map_elmhurst_alternative_wall never set
SapAlternativeWall.is_sheltered — so the cascade billed the sub-area at its
full exposed U instead of the RdSAP 10 Table 4 (p.22) sheltered U =
1/(1/U + 0.5).
The calculator already applies is_sheltered (_alt_wall_w_per_k) and the
gov-API path already wires sheltered_wall=="Y"; this brings the Elmhurst
front-end to parity. Three-part change: AlternativeWall.sheltered field +
_alternative_walls_from_lines parse ("Alternative Wall N Sheltered Wall") +
_map_elmhurst_alternative_wall is_sheltered=a.sheltered.
Surfaced by simulated case 34 (cert 001431 electric-storage flat): the
6.02 m² corridor wall billed at full U=1.50 (9.03 W/K) instead of the
sheltered 0.86 (5.18 W/K) — +3.85 W/K, -1.61 SAP. Post-fix the alt wall
matches the worksheet's (29a) 5.177 and case 34 closes from -1.61 to -0.30
(remaining residual is a separate window/wall area-allocation thread).
Elmhurst-mapper only: API SAP gauge unchanged (57.6% within 0.5); worksheet
harness 47/47 unaffected; regression gate green (3 pre-existing fails
unrelated); pyright net-zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Elmhurst dwelling-type classifier keyed "Top-floor flat" on a "dwelling
below" floor lodgement. A single-storey flat exposed BOTH top (a real
external roof) AND bottom (floor over partially-heated space, no dwelling
below) therefore fell through to "Ground-floor flat" — which the cascade's
_dwelling_exposure maps to has_exposed_roof=False, dropping the external
roof entirely.
Surfaced by simulated case 34 (cert 001431 reconfigured as a slimline
electric-storage flat): the worksheet bills (30) External roof = 39.98 m²
x U=2.30 = 91.95 W/K — the dominant heat-loss element — but the cascade
dropped it, under-stating space-heating demand by 42% (6550 vs 11357
kWh/yr) and over-predicting SAP by +21.76 (57.07 vs worksheet 35.31).
Fix: an exposed (non-party) roof puts the flat on the top storey
regardless of what is below it. Classify as "Top-floor flat" whenever the
roof is exposed; the flat's exposed floor is recovered downstream by the
existing per-BP is_above_partially_heated_space / is_exposed_floor override
in heat_transmission (§3). Party-roof flats ("another dwelling above") are
unaffected and stay Ground-/Mid-floor.
This is an Elmhurst-mapper (dwelling_type) bug, NOT a calculator bug: the
calculator correctly trusts dwelling_type, and the gov-API path supplies
the position directly (cert 0036 — a genuine ground-floor flat whose API
data lodges a "Pitched, no access" roof construction under another dwelling
— stays party, 2.51 W/K). API SAP gauge unchanged (57.6% within 0.5);
worksheet harness 47/47 unaffected; case 34 roof now exact (residual -1.61
is a separate flat-corridor wall-U thread). Regression gate green (3
pre-existing fails unrelated).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
When a property lodges an Alternative Wall, pdftotext interleaves the §11
"Location" column ("Alternative wall 1") into the wrapped glazing-TYPE cell,
producing labels like "Double between 2002 Alternative wall and 2021 1
Alternative wall" (cert 001431 storage-heater variants, simulated case 34).
The existing greedy trailing-suffix strip (\s+Alternative wall.*$) truncates
at the FIRST "Alternative wall", losing "and 2021" and yielding the
unmatchable "Double between 2002". Added a fallback that removes EVERY
"<External|Alternative|Party> wall [n]" fragment and any stray 1-2 digit
location index from the raw label, then retries the lookup. Loss-free: no
glazing-type key contains a wall-location phrase or a bare 1-2 digit number
(install-date years are 4 digits).
Unblocks the Summary cascade for any property with an Alternative Wall;
Summary-path only (the API path receives structured glazing codes, so the
API gauge is unaffected). Regression gate green (1 pre-existing fail
unrelated).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Elmhurst Summary section 15.1 "Hot Water Cylinder" block lodges
"Immersion Heater: Dual" / "Single"; the extractor dropped it, so the
Summary path left immersion_heating_type = None while the API path already
captured it. Capturing it drives SAP Table 13's high-rate-fraction
DHW-cost split (RdSAP 10 section 10.5 p.54: 1 = dual, 2 = single) and
brings the two front-ends to parity.
Three-file change: WaterHeating.immersion_type field +
_extract_water_heating parse (scoped to the 15.1..15.2 slice) +
_elmhurst_immersion_type_code mapper (strict-raise on an unmapped label,
mirroring _elmhurst_cylinder_insulation_code).
Safe to land now that the preceding commit zeroes the high-rate fraction
for 18-/24-hour tariffs: the 20 solid-fuel corpus certs (solid fuel 4-11:
WHC 903 dual immersion, 18-hour meter, 110 L) carry a dual immersion, but
their 18-hour tariff bills 100% low-rate per Table 12a's 7-/10-hour scope
— so they stay EXACT instead of regressing to the 10-hour-column ~0.10.
7-/10-hour Summary immersion certs now correctly cost the Table 13
high-rate fraction instead of falling to the immersion=None 100%-low
default.
Regression gate green (3 pre-existing fails unrelated); API gauge
unchanged (Summary-path-only): 57.6% within 0.5, mean|err| 1.185.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
pdftotext can wrap the §11 building-part column onto the glazing-TYPE
token without an intervening glazing-gap descriptor, e.g. "Double between
2002 and 2021 1st" (the "1st" marks the 1st Extension). The existing
trailing-gap fallback only strips the fragment when preceded by "N mm";
the bare ordinal raised UnmappedElmhurstLabel.
New `_ELMHURST_GLAZING_LABEL_TRAILING_BP_RE` strips a trailing ordinal
("1st"/"2nd"/…) or "Main" and retries the lookup. No glazing-type key
ends in an ordinal or "Main", so it is loss-free. Surfaced by worksheet
`simulated case 33` (direct-acting electric boiler + immersion), which
previously could not be routed through the Summary cascade.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`_separately_timed_dhw` returned True for any boiler+cylinder+from-main
cert, applying the SAP 10.2 Table 2b note b) ×0.9 temperature-factor
reduction unconditionally. For the lpg-boiler "before" worksheet (pre-
1998 LPG boiler SAP code 115 + 210 L cylinder, NO cylinder thermostat,
control 2113 "Room thermostat and TRVs" — no programmer) this dropped
the (53) temperature factor to 0.702 (= 0.60 × 1.3 × 0.9) where the
worksheet lodges 0.78 (= 0.60 × 1.3), under-counting cylinder storage
loss (55) by ~119 kWh/yr and over-rating SAP by ~0.25.
RdSAP 10 §10.5 (PDF p.57) "Hot water separately timed":
No programmer, pre-1998 boiler → No
Programmer, pre-1998 boiler → Yes
Post-1998 boiler → Yes
DHW is therefore NOT separately timed only when a pre-1998 boiler is
paired with a no-programmer control. Add the two SAP 10.2 Table 4c(2) /
Table 4b lookups (controls without a programmer = {2101, 2103, 2111,
2113}; pre-1998 gas/LPG boilers 110-119 + oil 124/125/128) and return
False for that combination; every other boiler+cylinder cert keeps the
separately-timed default, so the change is confined to old low-control
stock and the heating corpus + goldens are unchanged.
Effect: the full chain (Summary PDF → extractor → mapper → cert_to_inputs
→ calculator) now reproduces the lpg-boiler worksheet's §11a unrounded
SAP -6.6499 at abs < 1e-4 (was -6.4013). Full regression suite green bar
the 3 pre-existing unrelated fails.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
An LPG-boiler dwelling on the Summary → from_elmhurst_site_notes path
mapped to main_fuel_type=26 (mains gas), making it indistinguishable
from a mains-gas boiler downstream — wrong Table 12/32 cost / CO2 / PE
(bottled LPG is ~10.30 p/kWh vs mains gas 3.48), and it defeats any
"non-gas → gas only with a mains-gas connection" gate (an LPG dwelling
looks already-gas).
Root cause: the recommendation worksheets lodge the boiler carrier as
§15.0 "Water Heating Fuel Type: Bottled gas" (§14.0 carries only SAP
code 115, a Table 4b gas-family row, + "Main gas: Yes" in §14.2 — a
mains-gas CONNECTION, not the heating fuel). "Bottled gas" was absent
from `_ELMHURST_MAIN_FUEL_TO_SAP10`, so the §15.0 fuel resolved to None
and `_elmhurst_gas_boiler_main_fuel` fell through priority-1 to the
mains-gas meter flag → 26.
Map "Bottled gas" → 3 (bottled LPG MAIN heating): code 3 routes via
`API_FUEL_TO_TABLE_32`/`API_FUEL_TO_TABLE_12` → Table-code 3 (10.30 /
9.46 p/kWh). NOT the legacy "LPG bottled": 5 entry — API code 5 =
anthracite, and `canonical_fuel_code` resolves the same-valued Table-32
code 5 to anthracite (3.64 p/kWh), so a 5 here mis-prices the dwelling
as cheap solid fuel (verified: a 5 mapping moved SAP the WRONG way,
42.33 → 45.11; code 3 moves it to -6.40 vs the worksheet's -6.6499).
Also add 3 to `_GAS_LPG_MAIN_FUEL_CODES` so the §15.0-lodged bottled-LPG
water fuel is adopted as the boiler's space-heating carrier (priority 1)
instead of the meter flag.
Effect: main_fuel_type=3 (bottled LPG) and water_heating_fuel=3 (was
None). Mains-gas certs still → 26 (full regression suite green bar the 3
pre-existing unrelated fails); the MissingMainFuelType tripwire still
fires for genuinely-undeterminable carriers.
Spec: SAP 10.2 Table 12 / RdSAP 10 Table 32 (PDF p.95) — bottled LPG
main heating fuel code 3.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`_elmhurst_dwelling_type` derived a flat's roof exposure from
`room_in_roof is not None`, so a top-floor flat whose roof is a plain
external "PS Pitched, sloping ceiling" (no room-in-roof) fell through to
"Mid-floor flat". The cascade's `_dwelling_exposure` then treats a
mid-floor flat's roof as a party ceiling (RdSAP 10 §5 / §3 — party
surfaces carry no heat loss) and drops the entire roof term: cert
001431's 105 m² roof at U=2.3 = 241.68 W/K (30) vanished, collapsing
(33) fabric heat loss 320.06 → 78.38 and over-rating SAP by ~5 points
(on top of the age-band roof-U bug — see prior commit).
Read the roof TYPE instead — the dual of the floor's "Another dwelling
below" signal. A flat's roof is a party ceiling only when its Elmhurst
code is S / A / NR (Same/Another dwelling or Non-residential space
above); F / PN / PA / PS are exposed external roofs, so the dwelling is
on the top storey. `has_exposed_roof = room_in_roof present OR
_elmhurst_roof_is_exposed(roof)` — which is exactly what the function's
own docstring already described as the intent ("RR present or external
roof"), now implemented.
With both upstream fixes the full chain (Summary PDF → extractor →
mapper → cert_to_inputs → calculator) reproduces the worksheet's §11a
unrounded SAP 56.3649 at abs < 1e-4, with (30)/(33)/(37) matching to
the decimal. Only flat fixture reclassified; 000784 (top-floor, RR) and
000910 (ground-floor) unchanged. Regression suite green bar the 3
pre-existing unrelated fails.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Elmhurst Summary §3.0 "Date Built" lodges the per-building-part age
bands; the Main row reads "Main Property" / "C 1930-1949". But "Main
Property" ALSO heads the §4.0 Dimensions table, so the global
`_str_val("Main Property")` collides with it: when pdftotext renders
"3.0 Date Built:" glued onto its "Main Property" row token on one
layout line (as the recommendation worksheets do), the first standalone
"Main Property" match is the §4 dimensions header — returning its next
token "Floor" as the "age band".
That garbage age propagated to `u_roof`: for a "Pitched, sloping
ceiling" (PS) roof with no lodged insulation thickness, `u_roof` returns
the spec uninsulated U=2.3 for the correct age C but U=0.4 for the
unparseable "Floor" — collapsing the roof heat-loss term and inflating
SAP by ~14 points on the affected cert.
Scope the read to the Date-Built block (between "3.0 Date Built" and
"4.0 Dimensions") and take the first age row — a line beginning with a
single A-M band letter + space ("C 1930-1949", "A before 1900",
"J 2003-2006"). Building-part name rows never start that way, and the
Main row precedes any extension / room-in-roof rows.
Regression: full sap10_calculator + documents_parser suite green bar the
3 pre-existing unrelated fails (2 stone-wall U tests, test_total_floor_
area); the multi-bp / "A before 1900" fixtures (000516, 001431_case*,
6035) keep their age bands.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A Summary §14.0 Table 4b gas boiler (SAP code 101-119) lodges no §14.0
"Fuel Type" string in the newer Elmhurst export. The carrier was resolved
only from §15.0 "Water Heating Fuel Type" — fine when the same boiler
heats the water, but a gas boiler paired with a SEPARATE electric
immersion lodges §15.0 "Electricity", so `_elmhurst_gas_boiler_main_fuel`
returned None and the cascade strict-raised MissingMainFuelType.
Cert 001431 boiler-1/boiler-2 "before" variants are exactly this config:
§14.0 SAP code 102/104 (mains-gas boiler), §15.0 electric immersion
(code 909), §14.2 Meters "Main gas: Yes". The meter flag is the
authoritative carrier signal — a 101-119 boiler on mains gas burns mains
gas — so adopt it (SAP10 main_fuel 26 per _ELMHURST_MAIN_FUEL_TO_SAP10
"Mains gas") when §15.0 can't disambiguate. §15.0 gas/LPG still wins when
present (keeps LPG-vs-mains-gas precision); no mains-gas meter + non-gas
§15.0 still strict-raises rather than guessing.
Spec: SAP 10.2 Table 4b "Seasonal efficiency for gas and liquid fuel
boilers" (PDF p.168), rows 101-119. Both certs now resolve main_fuel=26
and compute (was: hard raise).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A 440 mm (>420 mm) solid brick AS-BUILT wall computed U = 1.70 (the
220 mm bucket default) instead of the RdSAP-correct 1.10. The §5.7
Table 13 thickness path only fired for *insulated* brick (external/
internal + thickness > 0); the as-built case fell through to the
Table 6 cavity/solid age-band default.
Spec: RdSAP 10 Specification (9th June 2025), §5.7 "U-values for
uninsulated brick walls, age bands A to E", Table 13 (PDF p.40):
≤200 mm → 2.5, 200–280 mm → 1.7, 280–420 mm → 1.4, >420 mm → 1.1.
Table 6 footnote (b) on the "Solid brick as built" row (PDF p.40):
"Or from 5.7 if wall thickness is other than 200mm to 280mm" — the
thickness table supersedes the flat 1.7 default whenever a documentary
wall thickness is lodged (200–280 mm gives 1.7 either way). The §5.8 /
Table 14 dry-lining R is added on top only when the wall is dry-lined,
per the §5.7 closing sentence.
Validated against the user-generated Elmhurst worksheet "simulated
case 21" (replica of API cert 2818-3053-3203-2655-9204: mid-terrace,
age band B, solid brick as-built 440 mm, room-in-roof). New §3 cascade
pin `test_section_3_wall_u_by_thickness_case21_match_pdf` routes the
Summary through the real extractor + mapper and pins:
(31) 155.1000, (33) 175.6208, (36) 23.2650, (37) 198.8858 — all 1e-4.
External walls Main U → 1.1000; Sheltered RR gable → 1/(1/1.10+0.5) =
0.71 (was 0.92). Pinned on §3 only (case-6 precedent): its code-908
instantaneous multi-point gas water heater has a separate §4 (219) gap.
Cross-check: sim case 20 (220 mm) stays at 1.70 — unchanged.
API SAP accuracy (scripts/eval_api_sap_accuracy.py, 896 computed certs):
% |err| < 0.5 SAP vs lodged: 42.6% → 43.8%; mean |err| 2.045 → 2.010.
Regression: tests/domain/sap10_calculator/ (1861), backend/
documents_parser/tests/ (574), datatypes/epc/ + rdsap golden fixtures
all green (pre-existing test_total_floor_area excepted). pyright strict
net-zero. No solid-brick fixture pin shifted (200–280 mm unchanged).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A Detailed room-in-roof lodges "Stud Wall" surfaces, but the cascade billed
every one through Table 17 from its insulation — over-counting fabric on
internal studs that carry no heat loss. sim case 20's two studs lodge §8.1
Default U-value 0.00 and the P960 worksheet omits them from BOTH fabric heat
loss (§3: (33)=285.9847) and total exposed area (31)=239.68; the cascade
computed ~0.52 each → (33) +4.16 W/K and continuous SAP 43.05 vs 43.6322.
Gate the drop on the lodged Default U-value: 0.00 → internal knee wall,
return None (no heat loss, no area); positive → a real exposed knee wall
(cert 000565 Ext2 Detailed: 0.31 / 0.10) that still falls through to the
Table-17 path. The earlier over-broad "drop all studs" zeroed 000565's
genuine studs — this keeps them.
Pins test_summary_001431_case20_fabric_heat_loss_matches_worksheet_line_33
((33)=285.9847 at 1e-4); case 20 continuous SAP now EXACT (43.6322). 2850
pass (the lone test_total_floor_area failure is pre-existing on base);
pyright strict net-zero (32=32).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sim case 20's §11 lodges 5 windows but only 1 surfaced. The "W H Area"
cells tokenize inconsistently: a narrow Area column keeps all three on one
line ("1.80 2.10 3.78" — matches _WIDTH_HEIGHT_AREA_RE), but a wider Area
column triggers pdftotext's 2+-space split, dropping the Area onto its own
line ("5.79 2.00" then "11.58"). The 3-decimal data anchor never matched
those four rows, so they were lost — gutting §6 solar gains (5 windows →
1) and dropping continuous SAP 43.05 → 38.32 vs the worksheet's 43.6322.
Pre-merge a "W H" line + a following lone-decimal Area into the canonical
"W H Area" line, gated on Area ≈ W × H (the §11 Area is always the product)
so a frame factor / g-value / U-value below a dimension line is never
absorbed. One-line layouts (3 decimals) are untouched.
Pins via test_summary_001431_case20_extracts_all_five_section11_windows
(Summary_001431_case20.pdf mirrors sap worksheets/golden fixture debugging/
simulated case 20/). 573 documents_parser tests pass; pyright strict net-zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
RdSAP 10 §2 (Ventilation, "Walls" row): "Structural infiltration: 0.25
for steel or timber frame or 0.35 for masonry construction ... System
build: treated as masonry." `_is_timber_or_steel_frame` wrongly included
wall_construction code 6 (system build) alongside code 5 (timber frame),
handing system-build dwellings the 0.25 structural ACH instead of 0.35.
On the cat-10 room-heater fixture (ref 001431, walls SY System Build →
code 6) this under-stated the infiltration rate (18) by exactly 0.10
(0.45 vs worksheet 0.55), dropping the effective air change (25), the
ventilation heat loss (38)m = 0.33 × (25)m × (5), and the heat-transfer
coefficient (39) — so space-heating demand (98) came out 404 kWh low
((211) 11158.6 vs worksheet 11563.2). Restrict the 0.25 branch to code 5
only; code 6 (and everything else) is masonry at 0.35.
Pins the rating-block (38)m ventilation heat loss mean = 83.3613 W/K at
abs 1e-4 and asserts the classifier treats the system-build wall as
masonry. §4 suite green (2415 passed, 1 skipped); no existing fixture
relied on system-build → 0.25.
Residual after this slice: SAP +0.03 / cost -£0.95 — a small fabric (33)
gap (-0.15 W/K) plus lighting (232) +1.0 kWh remain as separate causes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Water heating SAP code 909 (electric instantaneous) and 907 (single-point
gas) heat water at the point of use, serving one outlet with no
distribution pipework. Per SAP 10.2 §4 (p.23, l.1416): "'Single-point'
heaters, which are located at the point of use and serve only one outlet,
do not have distribution losses either." So worksheet (46)m = 0 and the
heat-required line collapses to SAP 10.2 worksheet l.7704
(62)m = 0.85 × (45)m + (46)m + (57)m + (59)m + (61)m
= 0.85 × (45)m (all loss terms zero for a no-cylinder system).
`distribution_loss_monthly_kwh` already supported the
`is_instantaneous_at_point_of_use` flag (and its docstring already named
codes 907/909), but `water_heating_from_cert` hard-coded it to False, so
the cascade applied (46)m = 0.15 × (45)m to single-point heaters. That
0.15 distribution loss exactly cancelled the 0.85 reduction, leaving
(62)m = (45)m. On the cat-10 room-heater fixture (ref 001431, code 909)
that over-stated the water fuel (219) as 2082.6250 instead of the
worksheet's 1770.2313, and inflated the (65)m heat gains (692.47 vs
worksheet 442.55) which in turn suppressed space-heating demand.
Thread the cert's existing instantaneous flag (`_INSTANTANEOUS_WATER_CODES`
= {907, 909}) through `_water_heating_worksheet_and_gains` into both the
demand-pass and final `water_heating_from_cert` calls.
Pins (219) water fuel = 1770.2313 at abs 1e-4 via the extractor → mapper →
rating cascade. §4 suite green (2414 passed, 1 skipped); no existing
fixture exercised the 907/909 path. The residual space-heating fuel gap
((211) 11158.59 vs worksheet 11563.17) this exposes is a separate cause —
next slice.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
cert 001431's §11 lodges 17 windows but only 14 surfaced, via two distinct gaps:
1. Extractor (_extract_windows_from_layout): the one "Double glazing, known
data" row whose §11 Data-Source cell is "BFRC data" was rejected — it is
laid out as a standalone keyword line with the U-value on the next line
and lodges no Frame Type/Factor/Gap cells, so it never matched the joined
"<source> <U>" Manufacturer-line shape. Now anchored by a standalone
data-source form, with the RdSAP 10 §3.7 default frame factor (0.7) for
the absent frame cell.
2. Mapper (_is_elmhurst_roof_window): the two "Double pre 2002" rows
(U 3.1 / 3.4 > 3.0) were reclassified as roof windows by the U-value
backstop even though both are lodged on an "External wall". A window
lodged on a wall is vertical by definition; guard the U-value backstop so
it only fires when location/BP give no roof signal.
With both closed: 17 sap_windows, 0 misrouted to sap_roof_windows.
Re-homed onto the mapper-validation line from feature/bill-derivation
(orig f68cea27); the modelling-only regression test
(tests/domain/modelling/test_window_extraction_001431.py) stays on
bill-derivation. KNOWN: the mapper guard breaks cert 000516's
test_summary_pdf_mapper_chain pins (W6 U=3.10 routing) — must be resolved
before this PRs to main.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
PR feedback (dancafc): `_parse_thickness_mm` handles a None input and
returns Optional[int], so its call-return locals — and the Optional[str]
raws they read from `_local_val` — read clearer when annotated. Annotates
`thickness_raw`/`ins_thickness_raw: Optional[str]` and
`thickness_mm`/`insulation_thickness_mm: Optional[int]` at all four call
sites (_wall_details_from_lines, _alternative_walls_from_lines,
_roof_details_from_lines, _floor_details_from_lines), plus the adjacent
`u_val_raw`/`default_u` Optional pair in _floor_details_from_lines for
consistency. Matches the project convention of typehinting call-return
locals. No behaviour change; pyright clean, 569 parser tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Completes the secondary-glazing family. S0380.235 mapped the unknown-data
(7) and normal-emissivity (11) secondary variants; the RdSAP-21.0.1
`glazed_type` enum also defines code 12 "secondary glazing, low
emissivity", whose Elmhurst §11 label "Secondary glazing - Low
emissivity" was unmapped and would strict-raise. Cascade code 12 carries
the same daylight/solar bucket as 7/11 (g_L=0.80, g⊥=0.76); the lodged
manufacturer U/g drive §3/§6. With this the double family (codes 1/2/3/
7/13 via their Elmhurst phrasings) and the secondary family (4/11/12) are
fully covered. Coverage test extended.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
RdSAP 10 §3.3: "As Main Wall: Yes" makes an extension inherit the main
dwelling's external wall CONSTRUCTION only — the party wall type is
lodged separately per building part in the Summary §7 block and may
differ. `_extract_extensions` was copying `main_walls.party_wall_type`
into the inherited WallDetails, so every extension reused the main's
party wall U.
On the double_glazing fixture (Summary_001431) the Main lodges party
"CU Cavity masonry unfilled" (SAP10 wall_construction 4 → u_party_wall
0.5) but the 1st Extension lodges "U Unable to determine" (→ 0 → RdSAP
default 0.25). Pre-fix both building parts used 0.5, inflating worksheet
(32) party-wall heat loss by 6.56 W/K (Ext1 26.25 m² × 0.25). After the
fix worksheet (32) is exact: ours 32.573 vs worksheet 32.5725.
Now reads the extension's own "Party Wall Type" from its §7 chunk,
falling back to the main's only when the extension lodges none. Adds a
fixture + test asserting Main=4 / Ext=0 with distinct u_party_wall.
Suite 2413 pass; no cohort regression.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The double_glazing recommendation fixture (Summary_001431) exercises every
RdSAP-21 §11 glazing lodging in one cert; five labels were missing from
`_ELMHURST_GLAZING_LABEL_TO_SAP10` and strict-raised `UnmappedElmhurstLabel`:
"Secondary glazing" -> 7 (Table 6b "secondary glazing", g_L 0.80)
"Secondary glazing - Normal emissivity" -> 11 (RdSAP-21 secondary normal-E, g_L 0.80)
"Triple pre 2002" -> 10 (triple pre-2002, g_L 0.70)
"Triple with unknown install date" -> 6 (generic triple glazed, g_L 0.70)
"Single glazing, known data" -> 15 (single known-data, g_L 0.90)
The glazing code's only cascade effect is the §5 (66)..(67) daylight factor
g_L in `_G_LIGHT_BY_GLAZING_CODE` (single 0.90 / double+secondary 0.80 /
triple 0.70); the lodged manufacturer U-value and solar_transmittance drive
§3 / §6 directly (`_g_perpendicular` prefers the lodged value). Codes are the
semantically-exact RdSAP-21 rows within the correct g_L bucket, kept distinct
for the strict-raise audit trail. Adds a full-coverage test over all 13
distinct labels. Suite 2413 pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 Appendix G4 (PDF p.72-73). A PV diverter routes surplus PV
generation (the would-be export EPV,m × (1 − βm)) to an immersion heater
in the hot-water cylinder. Per G4 step 4:
SPV,diverter,m = EPV,m × (1 − βm) × 0.8 × fPV,diverter,storageloss
(0.8 = cylinder heat-acceptance; fPV,diverter,storageloss = 0.9 for the
higher storage temperature), clamped to ≤ (62)m + (63a)m, and entered as
the negative worksheet (63b)m (step 5). The β factor is computed on the
PRE-diverter (219) per the §3a note (lines 5485-5486). Effects:
- (64)m = (62)m + (63b)m → less main-system water-heating fuel (219);
- export drops to EPV,ex,m = EPV,m(1 − βm) + (63b)m / 0.9 (§4 p.94
line 5501); the onsite dwelling portion EPV,m × βm is unchanged.
Inclusion (G4 step 1) requires ALL of: a PV system connected to the
dwelling; a cylinder larger than (43) average daily HW use; no solar
water heating; no battery — else the diverter is disregarded.
Three layers:
- extractor reads Summary §19 "Diverter present"; schema 21.0.0/21.0.1
SapEnergySource gains `pv_diverter` (API `sap_energy_source.pv_diverter`);
- `Renewables.pv_diverter_present` + domain `SapEnergySource.pv_diverter_present`,
set in both the Elmhurst and API mapper paths;
- `_pv_diverter_monthly_kwh` applies the G4 math after the β split;
`cert_to_inputs` recomputes (219) and the PV export.
On simulated case 19 (electric storage heaters, 7-hour, PV + diverter):
SAP continuous 50.33 → 51.34 (worksheet 51.2221; both round to the
lodged 51), cost (255) 1847.5 → 1812.3 (ws 1816.6), CO2 (272) 3331 →
3120 (ws 3126), with (233a) dwelling 1280.6 (ws 1280.4). The residual
+0.11 SAP is an upstream winter Appendix-M monthly-EPV-shape gap +
fabric (33) +1.0, tracked as the next case-19 cause. Suite: 2412 pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The gov-EPC API mapper sets BOTH roof_construction (int) and
roof_construction_type (str, derived via _API_ROOF_CONSTRUCTION_TO_STR),
but the Elmhurst mapper set only the string — leaving roof_construction
None on every site-notes cert. The SAP cascade reads the STRING (so SAP
cross-mapper parity always held), but consumers of the int (e.g.
domain/sap10_ml/transform.py ML aggregates `main_dwelling_roof_
construction`) silently saw None on the Elmhurst path.
New `_elmhurst_roof_construction_int` maps the Elmhurst roof-type code to
the same SAP10 int the API lodges (F→1, PN→3, PA→4, PS→8, S/A→7),
harvested from the committed Summary fixtures. Unlike the wall map it
returns None (not a strict-raise) for unmapped codes: the int is not
cascade-load-bearing, so an unknown roof must not block the cert (vaulted
5 / thatched 6 / NR omitted until a fixture surfaces them).
The 6 hand-built U985 reference fixtures gain the matching
roof_construction int (4/4/3 etc.) so test_from_elmhurst_site_notes_
matches_hand_built_* still asserts structural parity. SAP output is
unchanged (cascade reads the string). §4 suite green (2407 passed); the
two pre-existing stone-§5.6 sap10_ml failures are unrelated/out of scope.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
RdSAP10 `wall_construction == 6` is canonically WALL_SYSTEM_BUILT — a
WALL TYPE — but the gov-EPC basement heuristic hijacked it: Elmhurst
lodges both "SY System build" and "B Basement wall" as code 6, and the
API lodges basements as code 6 too, so a system-built wall was
mis-flagged `main_wall_is_basement` → wrong RdSAP §5.17 / Table 23
u_basement_wall/u_basement_floor overrides, and downstream the solid-wall
Recommendation Generator couldn't offer EWI/IWI on system-built walls.
System-built stays the wall type on its canonical code 6; the basement
signal moves OFF code 6 to a dedicated `is_basement` (SapAlternativeWall)
/ `wall_is_basement` (SapBuildingPart) Optional[bool] flag:
- Elmhurst: `_elmhurst_wall_is_basement` sets it from the distinct
"SY"/"B" labels (False for SY, True for B, None otherwise).
- gov-EPC API: per-wall code 6 can't be told apart at lodging time, so
`from_api_response` post-processes via `_clear_basement_flag_when_
system_built` — when the cert addendum marks the dwelling system-built,
the code-6 basement heuristic is cleared. A genuine basement (no
addendum signal) keeps the code-6 fallback.
- `main_wall_is_basement` / `is_basement_wall` honour the flag when set,
else fall back to the code-6 heuristic — so untouched API basements and
the cert 000565 "B" cohort are unchanged.
`EpcPropertyData.system_build` is a derived property over the wall type:
the MAIN wall is system-built iff `wall_construction == 6` and it is not
flagged basement. System-built lives on `wall_construction`; the basement
attribute is separate.
Acceptance: a system-built main wall (Elmhurst SY, or API addendum
system_build) → wall_construction == 6, main_wall_is_basement is False,
system_build is True; a genuine basement main wall → main_wall_is_basement
is True, system_build is False. Full §4 suite green (2404 passed).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Summary-path mapper raised UnmappedElmhurstLabel for a §15.1
"Cylinder Insulation Type: Jacket" lodging — only "Foam" (→1, factory)
was mapped. SAP10 cylinder_insulation_type uses 2 for loose jacket
(matching the GOV.UK API codes), and SAP 10.2 Table 2 Note 1 gives it a
separate ~2× storage-loss factor that the cascade now handles
(S0380.224). Add "Jacket" → 2 for cross-mapper parity with the API path
and so the loose-jacket storage-loss branch fires on the Summary path.
Surfaced by simulated case 19 (a 210 L jacket cylinder + electric storage
heaters), which previously couldn't extract at all. §4 suite 2397 passed;
mapper.py pyright unchanged at 32.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds simulated case 7: case 6 (P960-0001-001431) with the heating swapped
to a CONDENSING OIL COMBI (SAP code 130, Table 4b 82/73) and the cylinder
removed — combi instantaneous DHW (WHC 901), Table 3a keep-hot combi loss
(61) = 600 kWh/yr, no primary/storage loss, boiler interlock PRESENT (no
−5pp). This is the heating archetype golden cert 0240-0200-5706-2365-8010
uses, which case 6 (SAP code 127, a *regular* condensing oil boiler +
cylinder) never exercised.
The cascade reproduces the case-7 worksheet EXACTLY at abs=1e-4 on every
top-level SapResult output with ZERO calculator changes:
(211) 7865.4304 (213) 7556.9821 (219) 3496.8121 (98c) 12646.3783
(255) 1123.3372 (257) 1.9631 (272) 5738.9315 (258) 73
This validates the SAP 10.2 Appendix D Eq D1 combi efficiency blend +
Table 3a keep-hot combi loss + Table 4b code 130 (82/73) path, and
exonerates the combi mechanism as the source of 0240's API-path residual
— which therefore lives in 0240's fabric/demand or the API mapper.
Test-only slice (no impl change). New fixture file: 0 pyright errors.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Prerequisite for the SAP 10.2 p.186 two-systems-different-parts MIT.
When two main systems heat different parts of a dwelling, §14.1 Main
Heating2 lodges its OWN "Heat Emitter" + "Main Heating Controls Sap"
(simulated case 6: Main 1 radiators / control 2106 serving the living
area, Main 2 underfloor / control 2110 serving elsewhere). The extractor
+ mapper dropped both — `MainHeatingDetail.heat_emitter_type` and
`main_heating_control` came through as empty-string sentinels, so the
cascade saw system 2 as having no responsiveness (defaulted R=1.0) and no
control type.
- `MainHeating2` datatype gains `heat_emitter` + `heating_controls_sap`.
- The extractor reads them from the §14.1 block.
- `_map_elmhurst_main_heating_2` maps them via the same helpers as Main 1
(`_elmhurst_heat_emitter_int` → underfloor-in-screed = emitter 2, Table
4d R=0.75; `_elmhurst_sap_control_code` → 2110, Table 4e type 3),
threading the dwelling floor + age band for the underfloor subtype.
Empty-string fallback preserved for the legacy DHW-only Main 2 (cert
000565 §14.1 omits emitter/control). No cascade output changes yet — the
MIT consumer lands in S0380.205. Full suite 2358 pass + 0 fail.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Elmhurst extractor crashed parsing simulated-case-6's room-in-roof
window rows: the §11 "Location" cell "Roof of Room in Roof" wraps across
the layout prefix/suffix blocks and leaked into the glazing-type phrase
("Double between 2002 Roof of Room and 2021 in Roof" → UnmappedElmhurst-
Label). Fix (`_parse_window_from_anchors`): detect the roof-of-room
location tokens, strip them from the before/after blocks so the glazing
phrase reconstructs cleanly, and set location="Roof of Room".
Mapper: `_is_elmhurst_roof_window` gains a "Roof of Room" location branch
(highest-confidence rooflight signal, above the BP-roof-type / U>3.0
gates); `_ELMHURST_ROOF_WINDOW_U_BY_GLAZING` gains "Double between 2002
and 2021" → 2.30 (case 6 lodges the already-inclined roof-window U, so
the +0.30 inclination adjustment must not double-apply).
This is the site-notes mirror of S0380.198 (API window_wall_type=4):
both paths now route room-in-roof rooflights to (27a) at the inclined U.
Validated against the case-6 P960 worksheet at abs=1e-4:
(27) Windows = 22.7408 (cascade 22.7407)
(27a) Roof Windows = 13.0375 (cascade 13.0375, EXACT)
(31) ext area = 336.13
Case 6 is pinned only on the §3 window line refs (new standalone test,
not added to the section-pin `_FIXTURES`) because its DUAL main heating
(51% rads + 49% underfloor, oil) makes the §10/§12 per-system lines
non-comparable to SapResult's aggregated fields — documented in the
fixture module. Summary mirrored to Summary_001431_case6.pdf.
Suite: 2355 passed, 1 skipped. New code: 0 pyright errors.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Promotes user-simulated "case 5" (detached, sandstone-walled, room-in-roof
cousin of golden cert 0240) to an e2e worksheet fixture pinning the WHOLE
extractor → mapper → calculator pipeline at abs=1e-4 on all 11 Block-1
line refs. Its worksheet prints the exact RR-gable routing S0380.196
implements, validating that fix against ground truth:
Roof room Main Gable Wall 1 15.68 U=0.35 (29a) Exposed → walls @ main-wall U
Roof room Main remaining area 61.73 U=0.30 (30) A_RR shell − Σ gables
External roof Main 14.52 U=0.11 (30) loft residual
Roof room Main Gable Wall 2 15.68 U=0.25 (32) Party → party @ 0.25
gable area = 6.40 × 2.45 (§3.9.1 default RR storey height); A_RR remaining
= 12.5√(83.2/1.5) − 2×15.68 = 93.09 − 31.36 = 61.73 (RdSAP 10 §3.9.1(e)).
Confirms a DETACHED dwelling can lodge a Party RR gable (Table 4 p.22
row 2) — so my S0380.196 mapping (gable_wall_type 0=Party, 1=Exposed) is
correct; do not flip it.
Two extractor/mapper gaps surfaced and fixed (case 5 is the forcing test):
- Sandstone wall label "SS Stone: sandstone or limestone" had no
`_ELMHURST_WALL_CODE_TO_SAP10` entry (raised UnmappedElmhurstLabel).
Added "SS" → 2 (WALL_STONE_SANDSTONE), matching 0240's API
wall_construction=2 (cross-mapper parity).
- Roof "Insulation Thickness 400+ mm" was silently dropped: the four
thickness parsers used `.split()[0].isdigit()`, which rejects the
trailing "+" → None → u_roof fell back to the age-J default 0.16
instead of 0.11 (+1.09 W/K roof, the whole 0.12 SAP gap). Added
`_parse_thickness_mm` (strips to leading digits) and applied it at all
four sites (walls / alt-wall / roof / floor). The only existing fixture
with "400+ mm" (000565 Stud Wall) routes via the RIR regex, unaffected.
Result: case 5 cascade ≡ worksheet at 1e-4 on SAP/ECF/cost/CO2 + every
energy stream. Neither gap affects 0240 (its API path captures both the
sandstone code and "400mm+"); 0240's residual is therefore non-fabric.
Suite: 2353 passed, 1 skipped. New code: 0 pyright errors.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds the user-simulated case-4 worksheet as e2e fixture `001431_6035` —
reproduces golden cert 6035's full floor geometry (Main ground-floor HLP
15.99 + first-floor HLP 8.32, the asymmetric upper storey) and 8 windows.
All 11 Block-1 line refs pin at abs=1e-4 against the worksheet (SAP 68,
ECF 2.2802, cost 937.2341, CO2 4682.3494, space 15745.3260, main fuel
18744.4357).
This is the 4th independent 1e-4 confirmation across the 6035 archetype
(sim cases 1-4). Case 4 matches 6035 on floors + window areas; the
residual ~50 kWh / £11 cascade delta vs 6035 is two lodged inputs only
(largest window orientation N vs S; meter type "Dual" vs API 2), not
calculator behaviour.
Conclusion: the cascade reproduces the spec engine exactly for 6035's
geometry, so 6035's +19 PE vs the lodged register is lodged-register
divergence (the gov.uk register's rounded value vs the spec-exact
worksheet), NOT a calculator gap. 6035 is a "pin-forever" lodged-only
cert. Bugs surfaced + fixed along the way: S0380.192 (Simplified-RR
remaining area) and S0380.193 (suspended-floor sealed rule).
2341 passed (+11), 0 failed; pyright net-zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds the user-simulated case-3 worksheet as e2e fixture `001431_rr8` —
Main + Extension + Simplified room-in-roof with 8 windows (≈14.15 m²,
reproducing golden cert 6035's glazing) and Main ground-floor HLP 15.99.
All 11 Block-1 line refs pin at abs=1e-4 against the worksheet (SAP 68,
cost 951.3425, CO2 4767.4862, space 16086.3557, main fuel 19150.4235,
HW 3307.2639, lighting 262.0885).
This is the third independent 1e-4 confirmation that the cascade
reproduces the spec engine for the 6035 archetype (after S0380.192
Simplified-RR + S0380.193 suspended-floor). It differs from 6035 in one
input only — the Main first-floor HLP (15.99 here vs 6035's 8.32) — so
6035's +19 PE vs the lodged register is lodged-register divergence, not
a calculator gap. A byte-identical 6035 replica (first-floor HLP 8.32)
would let 6035 itself be pinned directly to close that out.
2330 passed (+11), 0 failed; pyright net-zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
RdSAP 10 §5 (PDF p.29) "Floor infiltration (suspended timber ground
floor only)", age band A-E, splits on whether a floor U-value is
supplied:
a) [U-value supplied] if floor U-value < 0.5 → "sealed", (12) = 0.1
b) [no U-value supplied] retro-fitted insulation → "sealed" 0.1;
otherwise "unsealed", (12) = 0.2
`_has_suspended_timber_floor_per_spec` fed the cascade's COMPUTED default
U into rule (a), so an as-built/uninsulated suspended-timber floor whose
default U happens to be < 0.5 was marked "sealed" (0.1) where Elmhurst
uses "unsealed" (0.2). That dropped (18) infiltration 0.85 → 0.75, (25)
effective ACH, HTC, and understated space heating ~450 kWh.
Fix: gate rule (a) on `floor_u_value_known` — a computed default U is not
a supplied value, so it falls through to (b). Verified against the
cert 001431 sim-case-2 worksheet: floor "As built", U=0.43 (matches the
worksheet's (28a) 0.4300 exactly), (12)=0.2 unsealed. Golden cert 6035
(also a suspended uninsulated floor) is unaffected — its U=0.63 ≥ 0.5
already routed to unsealed.
Promotes sim case 2 to the e2e harness as `001431_rr` (Main + Extension
+ Simplified room-in-roof — the 6035 archetype). All 11 Block-1 line
refs pin at abs=1e-4, locking BOTH this fix and S0380.192 (Simplified-RR
remaining area) end-to-end: SAP 69, cost 920.5046, CO2 4566.7090, space
15269.8593, main fuel 18178.4039. 2319 passed (+11), 0 failed; pyright
net-zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Summary PDFs preprocessed from `pdftotext -layout` wrap the windows-table
header across several lines. The third header line's tail ("U value / g
value / Draught Proofed / Permanent Shutters") tokenises to "value value
Proofed Shutters" and lands directly above the FIRST window's data row.
Because the first window in a building part has `before_start = 0`, its
prefix block reaches back into that header remnant. The remnant is
neither an orientation nor a building-part fragment, so it survived the
pops in `_compose_window_descriptors` and leaked into glazing_type as
"value value Proofed Shutters Double between 2002 and 2021" (windows 2-3,
whose prefix starts after the previous window's manufacturer line, were
clean).
Fix: the glazing-type phrase always starts with a glazing-start word
(Single/Double/Triple/Secondary), so trim any prefix fragments preceding
that word before joining the glazing type. Orientation/bp pops still run
on the full prefix, so they are unaffected.
Reproduced from `sap worksheets/Recommendations Elmhurst Files/
cavity_wall_insulation - main wall/before/Summary_001431.pdf`. Added a
regression test driving the real `_extract_windows_from_layout` path with
the verbatim tokenised header+rows. 2306 passed (+4), pyright net-zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds the user-simulated 001431 case (the cert that drove S0380.189/.190)
as an Elmhurst-only e2e fixture: Summary PDF → extractor → mapper →
calculator, every Block-1 SapResult field pinned against the
P960-0001-001431 worksheet at abs=1e-4. All 11 pins pass with zero
residual — the case is clean, confirming the S0380.190 gas-combi fuel
derivation closes the Summary path natively.
Verified the handover's flagged "+0.0007 SAP" was a target artifact, not
a cascade gap: the worksheet displays ECF (257) rounded to 1.6047 and
integer SAP (258)=78; the cascade's continuous SAP is computed from the
UNROUNDED ECF = (255)*(256)/((4)+45) = 660.9750*0.4200/173.0, giving
77.6147 — which matches the worksheet's own unrounded value. Pinning the
continuous SAP from the display-rounded ECF (→ 77.6144) was the wrong
target. Block-1 line refs all match exactly: (211) 10699.7225, (219)
3327.1592, (231) 86.0, (232) 283.2229, (255) 660.9750, (272) 3000.1664,
Σ(98) 8987.7669.
Summary mirrored into the tracked fixtures dir as
Summary_001431_gas_combi.pdf (distinct name — the corpus reuses cert
001431 across every heating variant); source Summary + worksheet tracked
under sap worksheets/golden fixture debugging/ as the pin ground truth.
2302 passed (+11), 0 failed; pyright net-zero on new/changed files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CH6's P960 worksheet input lodges Distribution Loss = "Two adjoining
dwellings sharing a single heating system" → (306) DLF = 1.0000, vs CH4's
"Calculated" → 1.5 → (306) = 1.4500. That DLF choice swings SAP/cost/CO2/PE
materially, but it is NOT present in the Summary PDF that the corpus pipeline
consumes (Summary → ElmhurstSiteNotesExtractor → mapper → calculator).
Proven empirically with a user-supplied controlled pair (CH adjoined
dwellings/Summary_001431 (1) vs (2)): the two Summaries are byte-identical
across every RdSAP INPUT field, differing only in the derived header
(SAP 80 vs 75, bill £954 vs £1237, emissions 5.407 vs 7.394 t). A
case-insensitive scan of the CH6 Summary for "distribution"/"adjoin" returns
0 hits. Since CH4/CH6 Summaries are themselves identical bar fuel type, no
Summary-derivable rule can yield CH4=1.45 AND CH6=1.0.
Doc-only change (comment in _EXPECTATIONS); 20/20 community-heating corpus
tests pass. Closes the CH6 re-litigation: pin held.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 worksheet block 12b/13b (367)/(467) for a community heating
electric heat pump (Table 4a code 304 → Table 12 fuel 41 "heat from
electric heat pump"). The HP meters grid electricity, so per Table 12
note (s)/(t) + block 12b/13b footnote (a) its emission/PE factor is the
MONTHLY Table 12d/12e cascade (fuel 41 = standard-electricity profile),
weighted by the network heat profile, then × 1/heat-source-eff (1/COP):
(367)/(467) = [(307)+(310)] / COP × Σ((307+310)_m × factor_m)/Σ(...)
Per-line walk of CH3 (the displayed (367) 0.1535 / (467) 1.5717 are PDF
artifacts; the (373)/(473) totals reconcile only with):
CO2 factor = 0.15040 (monthly Table 12d wtd) vs cascade annual 0.136
PE factor = 1.55692 (monthly Table 12e wtd) vs cascade annual 1.501
Pre-slice the cascade routed code 304 through the non-electric branch
(`_co2_factor_kg_per_kwh(main) × 1/COP` = annual × scaling). New
`_is_heat_network_electric_main` (heat-network main whose fuel has a
Table 12d monthly set — i.e. fuel 41) routes all four factor helpers
(main + HW, CO2 + PE) through the monthly cascade × 1/COP. Non-electric
heat networks (gas 51 / oil 53 / coal 54) have no monthly set → annual
path unchanged (CH1, CH6 untouched).
Closure (CH3 was already SAP+cost EXACT):
CH3 (HP/Elec) CO2 −75.32→+0.0000 (= [(307+310)/3]×(0.1504−0.136)),
PE −249.32→−0.0000 (× (1.5569−1.501)) — FULLY EXACT
Corpus now 40/41 EXACT on all four metrics. Only CH6 remains: its
worksheet lodges a manual DLF=1.0 ("two adjoining dwellings") absent
from the Summary PDF (byte-identical to CH4 bar fuel type) — an
architectural limit, not a cascade gap. 2226 pass + 1 skip + 0 fail
(tolerances 1e-4 all metrics); pyright net-zero 43→43.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 §10b: hot water for a community-heating dwelling bills at the
heat-network rate, not the cert-lodged fuel. Elmhurst §15.0 lodges
`water_heating_fuel_type = "Mains gas"` (3.48 p/kWh) as a placeholder on
community certs; the worksheet (342) Water-heating cost = (310) × the
S0380.171 CHP heat-fraction blend — the SAME rate as space heating (340).
Per-line walk of the CH2 block 10b:
(340) space = 11837.83 × 0.037955 = 449.3047 (cascade EXACT)
(342) water = 3854.12 × 0.037955 = 146.2830 (cascade billed
3854.12 × 0.0348 = 134.12 → −£12.16, the whole residual)
(350) lighting + (351) standing → (355) 754.1502.
`_hot_water_fuel_cost_gbp_per_kwh`'s `inherit_main_for_community_heating`
path already routes HW cost through `_fuel_cost_gbp_per_kwh(main)` (the
CHP blend), but its gate `_is_community_heating_hw_from_main` excluded
code 302. S0380.182 wired the 302 CO2/PE credit via
`_heat_network_code_302_effective_factor`, which intercepts the HW
CO2/PE helpers ABOVE this predicate's branch — so extending the
predicate to include 302 now affects ONLY the cost path.
Closures:
CH2 (CHP/Gas) SAP +0.5277→−0.0000, cost −£12.16→−£0.00 — FULLY EXACT
CH4 (CHP/Oil) SAP +0.5277→−0.0000, cost −£12.16→−£0.00 — FULLY EXACT
CH6 (CHP/Coal) SAP −7.49→−8.02, cost +£172.68→+£184.84 — its HW now
also bills the blend, compounding the DLF=1.0 quirk
(cascade DLF=1.45); same separate CH6 DLF front.
Corpus now 39 variants EXACT on all four metrics (CH2/CH4 join). Open:
CH3 CO2/PE (code-304 community-HP COP), CH6 all-metric (DLF=1.0 manual
override the Summary doesn't carry). 2225 pass + 1 skip + 0 fail
(tolerances 1e-4 all metrics); pyright net-zero 32→32.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 worksheet block 12b (CO2) / 13b (PE) for community heating
"CHP and boilers" (SAP code 302). Per unit of network heat fuel
H = (307)+(310) the effective generation factor is:
chp×100/(362)×f_fuel − chp×(361)/(362)×f_disp + (1−chp)×100/(367)×f_fuel
(363)/(463) CHP fuel = chp_frac × 100/heat_eff × f_fuel
(364)/(464) less credit = −chp_frac × elec_eff/heat_eff × f_disp
(368)/(468) boiler fuel = (1−chp_frac) × 100/boiler_eff × f_fuel
f_fuel = Table 12 heat-network fuel factor (the CHP unit and the back-up
boilers burn the same community fuel — verified vs CH2 gas / CH4 oil /
CH6 coal worksheets (363)/(368)); f_disp = Table 12f (PDF p.196) credit
for the CHP-generated electricity. RdSAP 10 §C (p.58) defaults: heat eff
50% (362), electrical eff 25% (361), boiler eff 80% (367); CHP heat frac
0.35 per-cert via community_heating_chp_fraction.
New `_heat_network_code_302_effective_factor` + Table 12f flexible
constants (0.420 CO2 / 2.369 PE) + RdSAP §C efficiency constants, wired
into all four factor helpers (main + HW, CO2 + PE) ahead of the existing
single-fuel / 1-over-heat-source-eff path. The worksheet (368)/(468)
boiler emissions DISPLAY rounded/mis-aligned in the PDF, but the
(373)/(473)/(386)/(486) totals reconcile only with the boiler at the
full Table 12 factor — verified EXACT.
Two spec citations applied:
- Table 12f flexible-operation default for RdSAP community CHP is an
Elmhurst engine choice (Table 12f notes make "standard" the default);
mirrored per [[feedback-software-no-special-handling]] and documented
in SAP_CALCULATOR.md §8.3.
- Table 12 heat-network oil/biodiesel CO2 (codes 53/56) corrected
0.298 → 0.335 per Table 12 (p.189) "assumes 'gas oil'"; the code-302
oil cascade (CH4) was the first to exercise it. PE 1.180 was already
correct. No other variant uses these codes (no regression).
Closures (CO2 + PE only — the CHP credit does not touch cost/SAP):
CH2 (CHP/Gas) CO2 −1411.49→+0.0000, PE +1331.23→+0.0000 EXACT
CH4 (CHP/Oil) CO2 −4378.24→−0.0000, PE +319.81→−0.0000 EXACT
CH6 (CHP/Coal) CO2/PE re-pinned (+2411.54 / +5023.48) — its worksheet
lodges a manual DLF=1.0 the Summary doesn't carry, so
cascade DLF=1.45 over-scales H; same root as the CH6
SAP −7.49 / cost +£172 (separate DLF front).
CH2/CH4 are now CO2+PE-exact but still carry the heat-network cost/SAP
residual (+0.5277 SAP / −£12.16 cost, exposed by S0380.175 — cost-side,
untouched here). CH3 unchanged (code 304 community-HP COP front).
Corpus state: 37 variants EXACT on all four metrics (incl. CH1);
remaining residuals are CH2/CH4 cost+SAP, CH3 CO2+PE (HP COP), CH6
all-metric (DLF quirk). 2223 pass + 1 skip + 0 fail (tolerances 1e-4 all
metrics per S0380.181); pyright net-zero 43→43.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The corpus residual-pin tolerances had drifted looser than the comment
above them claimed ("pin at 1e-4 relative to lodged precision"): SAP was
1e-3, cost ±£0.01, CO2 ±0.1 kg, PE ±0.1 kWh. A ±0.1 kg CO2 band could
silently mask a ~0.09 kg drift on a variant we report as EXACT.
The worksheet pins are extracted from the P960 PDF text, which prints
4 d.p., so the hard residual floor is ~5e-5 (half a unit in the last
printed digit) regardless of cascade precision. 1e-4 sits just above
that floor. All 41 variants hold at uniform 1e-4 on continuous SAP,
cost, CO2 AND PE — confirming the 37 EXACT variants are genuinely exact
to PDF print-rounding and the looser bands were masking nothing.
Aligns the guard with [[feedback-zero-error-strict]] /
[[feedback-continuous-sap-tolerance]] (basically zero error across all
four metrics). Test-only change; no cascade behaviour touched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
