57241322ea
CH6's P960 worksheet input lodges Distribution Loss = "Two adjoining dwellings sharing a single heating system" → (306) DLF = 1.0000, vs CH4's "Calculated" → 1.5 → (306) = 1.4500. That DLF choice swings SAP/cost/CO2/PE materially, but it is NOT present in the Summary PDF that the corpus pipeline consumes (Summary → ElmhurstSiteNotesExtractor → mapper → calculator). Proven empirically with a user-supplied controlled pair (CH adjoined dwellings/Summary_001431 (1) vs (2)): the two Summaries are byte-identical across every RdSAP INPUT field, differing only in the derived header (SAP 80 vs 75, bill £954 vs £1237, emissions 5.407 vs 7.394 t). A case-insensitive scan of the CH6 Summary for "distribution"/"adjoin" returns 0 hits. Since CH4/CH6 Summaries are themselves identical bar fuel type, no Summary-derivable rule can yield CH4=1.45 AND CH6=1.0. Doc-only change (comment in _EXPECTATIONS); 20/20 community-heating corpus tests pass. Closes the CH6 re-litigation: pin held. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .devcontainer | ||
| .github/workflows | ||
| .idea | ||
| .vscode | ||
| applications | ||
| asset_list | ||
| backend | ||
| backlog | ||
| datatypes | ||
| deployment/terraform | ||
| docs | ||
| domain | ||
| epr_data_exports | ||
| etl | ||
| infrastructure | ||
| model_data/requirements | ||
| orchestration | ||
| recommendations | ||
| repositories | ||
| sap worksheets/heating systems examples | ||
| scripts | ||
| sfr/principal_pitch | ||
| survey_report | ||
| tests | ||
| utilities | ||
| utils | ||
| .coveragerc | ||
| .dockerignore | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| ara_backend_design.md | ||
| BaseUtility.py | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| conftest.py | ||
| CONTEXT.md | ||
| devcontainer.sh | ||
| Dockerfile.test | ||
| Dockerfile.test.dockerignore | ||
| Makefile | ||
| MEMORY.md | ||
| package-lock.json | ||
| package.json | ||
| pyproject.toml | ||
| pyrightconfig.json | ||
| pytest.ini | ||
| README.md | ||
| run_lambda_local.sh | ||
| serverless.yml | ||
| test.requirements.txt | ||
| tox.ini | ||
| UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md | ||
Model Repository
This repository contains the code pertaining to the development of the data science and machine learning products being utilised by Hestia.
The different folders in this repository relate to services that can be used independently, or can be imported and used as part of a larger application
Getting Started
Prerequisites
Dev Container Setup
This repo uses a Docker Compose-based dev container. The model-backend service joins a shared-dev Docker network so it can communicate with other local services (e.g. a frontend container) running on your machine.
VS Code users: The initializeCommand in devcontainer.json creates the shared-dev network automatically before the container starts. No manual step required — just open the repo and select Reopen in Container.
Non-VS Code / CI workflows: Run the following once before starting the container:
make dev-setup
This is idempotent and safe to re-run if the network already exists.
Folders
backend/
This folder contains the code for the fastapi backend service, which provides an interface to much of the functionality in this repository, for the frontend
model_data/
This folder contains related to the reading and preparation of assessment model data, including pulling out epc attributes
Testing
All tests can be run, against the configuration in pytest.ini running
pytest
This will run the complete panel of tests and report on coverage in the locations specified by the pytest.ini file.
To run tests in a specific service, e.g. inside of model_data, simply run
pytest --cov-config=model_data/.coveragerc --cov=model_data
This will produce the test results and coverage reports