mirror of
https://github.com/Hestia-Homes/Model.git
synced 2026-07-12 13:29:04 +00:00
72ef0f0e7b
When a heat-pump cert lodges a PCDB Table 362 record, the APM override set BOTH the space efficiency (N3.6) and the water efficiency (N3.7a) from the heat pump unconditionally. But the PCDB η_water applies only when the DHW is heated BY the heat pump (water-heating code "from main": 901/902/914). A separate electric immersion (WHC 903) heats the water at 100% regardless of the space system, so applying the HP's water SCOP (187.5% × 0.6 in-use = 112.5%) under-counted the immersion's hot-water fuel. Gate the η_water override on the DHW-from-main codes; a separate immersion keeps its own 100% efficiency. Space η_space still always uses the APM value (the heat pump is the space main). Worksheet-validated to 1e-4 on simulated case 45 (HP space + WHC-903 immersion): water fuel (62) 1893.57 -> 2130.2639, total cost (255) 619.7433, CO2 692.13 — all matching the P960 exactly; SAP 60.53 -> rounds to the worksheet's 61. RdSAP-21.0.1 corpus unchanged (no HP+WHC903 certs in it). Pinned in test_cert_to_inputs (immersion fuel is main-independent). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| climate | ||
| rdsap | ||
| validation | ||
| worksheet | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| test_bre_worked_examples.py | ||
| test_calculator.py | ||
| test_pcdb_etl.py | ||
| test_pcdb_lookup.py | ||
| test_pcdb_table_322_lookup.py | ||
| test_pcdb_table_329_lookup.py | ||
| test_pcdb_table_362_lookup.py | ||
| test_postcode_weather.py | ||
| test_table_12.py | ||
| test_table_12a.py | ||
| test_table_13.py | ||
| test_table_32.py | ||