Model/docs/adr/0023-lighting-eligibility-and-overlay.md
Khalim Conn-Kowlessar b460f81233 docs: lighting eligibility, overlay + pricing design (ADR-0023 + CONTEXT)
Resolved in a grill-with-docs pass. recommend_lighting converts ALL non-LED
bulbs (incandescent + CFL + low-energy-unknown) to LED — all the way to LED, not
the legacy "fill to low energy", because SAP §12-1 rates LED efficacy (100)
above LEL (80) / CFL (55). A free Optimiser candidate (it improves SAP), unlike
ventilation's forced dependency. Its overlay is the first whole-dwelling,
top-level surface: a LightingOverlay carrying the four bulb-count fields by
their exact EPC names, folded directly onto EpcPropertyData (led=total, others
0). Priced per-bulb x non-LED count, contingency 0.26, measure_type
low_energy_lighting (MEASURE_MAP-aligned; "LED" in the description). Validation:
real before/after cascade pins (zero-existing-LEDs + some-existing-LEDs) at 1e-4,
clean (no fabric coupling). Ground-truth confirmed: 20 incandescent -> 20 LED
drops lighting (232) 783.7 -> 232.7 kWh/yr.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-05 12:02:40 +00:00

42 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Lighting Eligibility, Overlay, and Pricing
The lighting Recommendation Generator offers an LED upgrade. Three decisions are load-bearing and non-obvious: that it converts **all** non-LED bulbs to LED (not the legacy "fill to low-energy"), that its Simulation Overlay is the first **whole-dwelling, top-level** surface, and that it is a **free Optimiser candidate** rather than a forced dependency like ventilation.
## Decision
**One dispatching generator, one Measure, all non-LED bulbs to LED.** `recommend_lighting(epc, products)` emits one "Lighting" Recommendation with a **single** Measure Option:
- **Scope:** the dwelling's four lodged fixed-lighting bulb counts — `led_`, `cfl_`, `incandescent_`, `low_energy_fixed_lighting_bulbs_count` (the last is RdSAP "low energy, LED/CFL unknown", LEL). The Measure converts **every non-LED bulb** (incandescent + CFL + LEL) to **LED**. Trigger: `incandescent + cfl + low_energy_unknown > 0`. When that sum is zero — already all-LED, **or** no bulb counts lodged (the calculator's L5b/L8c fallback case, where we have no inventory to size against) — no Recommendation is offered.
- **All the way to LED, not "low energy".** SAP 10.2 RdSAP §12-1 rates lamp efficacy LED **100** > LEL **80** > CFL **55** > incandescent **11.2** lm/W, so converting *every* non-LED type — including CFL and LEL — strictly improves efficacy and lighting energy (Appendix L, worksheet line (232)). The legacy generator only filled outlets to "low energy" and treated CFL as already-efficient; we go to LED for the larger, honest SAP gain.
- **Free Optimiser candidate**, run in `_candidate_recommendations` alongside the fabric measures — **not** a forced Measure Dependency. Ventilation is forced precisely because it only ever *costs* SAP; an LED upgrade *improves* SAP at low cost, so the Optimiser should be free to keep or leave it for least-cost-to-target. (Validated on the real cert: 20 incandescent → 20 LED drops lighting (232) from 783.7 → 232.7 kWh/yr.)
**The overlay is the first whole-dwelling, top-level surface.** Unlike walls/roofs/floors (per `SapBuildingPart`) or glazing (per `sap_windows` index), the bulb counts live **top-level on `EpcPropertyData`**. `EpcSimulation` gains `lighting: Optional[LightingOverlay]` (the 4th overlay surface, after building parts, windows, ventilation):
```python
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class LightingOverlay: # all-optional partial; counts are absolute
led_fixed_lighting_bulbs_count: Optional[int] = None
cfl_fixed_lighting_bulbs_count: Optional[int] = None
incandescent_fixed_lighting_bulbs_count: Optional[int] = None
low_energy_fixed_lighting_bulbs_count: Optional[int] = None
```
The field names match the EPC exactly so the applicator folds by `setattr` (as `_fold_ventilation` does), writing **directly onto the result `EpcPropertyData`** — no nested object, simpler than ventilation. The counts are **absolute target states** (like `wall_insulation_thickness=100`): the generator reads the baseline, sums `total`, and emits `led=total, cfl=0, incandescent=0, low_energy=0`. This handles both scenarios uniformly — "zero existing LEDs" (`led 0→total`) and "some existing LEDs" (`led tops up to total`).
**Pricing: flat per-bulb price × count of non-LED bulbs.** `Cost.total = (incandescent + cfl + low_energy_unknown) × product.unit_cost_per_m2`, reusing that field as a per-bulb price exactly as glazing reuses it per-window and ventilation per-unit; `contingency_rate = 0.26` (the legacy `low_energy_lighting` rate). LEL bulbs are priced too, since they're converted.
**`measure_type = "low_energy_lighting"`.** Although the Measure installs LED specifically, `measure_type` is a cross-cutting catalogue classification that `MEASURE_MAP` / `Funding` and reporting key on, so we keep the established legacy name and put "LED" in the Option **description** and the all-LED overlay — not in a new `led_lighting` type the rest of the system wouldn't recognise.
## Considered options
- **Fill to 100% "low energy" (legacy behaviour), leaving CFL as-is.** Rejected: the calculator rates LED above CFL (100 vs 55 lm/W), so going all-LED is a strictly larger, truthful SAP gain — and the real Elmhurst after-cert lodges LED, not a CFL/LEL mix.
- **A forced Measure Dependency (like ventilation).** Rejected: lighting *improves* SAP, so there is a genuine cost/benefit choice for the Optimiser — a free candidate is honest; a forced injection is not.
- **`measure_type = "led_lighting"`.** Rejected: precise but divergent — `MEASURE_MAP`/`Funding` and legacy reporting key on `low_energy_lighting`; the precision lives in the description instead.
- **A leaner overlay (single `all_led` flag the applicator expands).** Rejected: the four absolute counts mirror the EPC by name, keep the generic by-name fold, and stay greppable — consistent with every other overlay carrying real EPC fields.
## Consequences
- `EpcSimulation` grows its first **whole-dwelling, top-level** overlay surface (`lighting`) — the applicator's fold writes onto the `EpcPropertyData` directly rather than a nested object or a targeted part/window.
- Lighting is wired into the free candidate pool (`_candidate_recommendations`), priced in the catalogue and contingency table under `low_energy_lighting`, and added to the `_GENERATOR_MEASURE_TYPES` forcing test.
- Validation uses real Elmhurst before/after certs (two scenarios: "zero existing LEDs" and "some existing LEDs") as 1e-4 cascade pins. Lighting changes only bulb counts → Appendix L (232), with **no fabric coupling** (contrast glazing's draught-proofing/frame-factor), so the pins are expected to close cleanly with no xfail.
- A genuinely all-incandescent dwelling that lodged **zero** bulb counts (a data gap) gets no Recommendation — a data-completeness limitation, not a modelling choice, since we refuse to fabricate an outlet count.