mirror of
https://github.com/Hestia-Homes/Model.git
synced 2026-06-08 11:17:27 +00:00
bb8307413f
A "Pitched, sloping ceiling" (roof_construction == 8) lodges its
insulation in the dedicated `sloping_ceiling_insulation_thickness` field,
not `roof_insulation_thickness` (which stays None — the loft-joist field
is meaningless for a slope-following ceiling). The schema dataclasses
dropped that field, so `from_dict` discarded it and the cascade treated
the slope as uninsulated; worse, the pre-1950 None-fallback forced 0 mm
(U=2.30), over-stating roof heat loss ~74%.
Surface the field on SapBuildingPart (schemas 21.0.0 / 21.0.1) and prefer
it in `_api_resolve_sloping_ceiling_thickness` when it carries a NUMERIC
thickness: "100mm" now reaches Table 17 column (1a) "Insulated slope –
sloping ceiling, mineral wool/EPS" (RdSAP 10 §5.11.3 p.44 — 100 mm →
U=0.40) instead of 2.30. Categorical lodgements ("AB" As Built / "NI")
are not measured thicknesses, so they fall through to the existing
as-built rule (Table 18 col (3) via is_pitched_sloping_ceiling).
Cert 9884-3059-9202-7506 (code 8, age B, sloping 100 mm): SAP −5.54 → +0.06.
Cert 8036-2925-6600-0202: −4.94 → +1.55. No regressions in the roof-8
cohort (the "AB" certs are unchanged). Eval headline 43.8% → 44.3% within
0.5; golden fixtures incl. 6035 green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| domain | ||
| loaders | ||
| schema | ||
| search | ||
| surveys | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| construction_age_band.py | ||
| efficiency.py | ||
| floor.py | ||
| fuel.py | ||
| heating_controls.py | ||
| hotwater.py | ||
| main_heating.py | ||
| property_type_built_form.py | ||
| roof.py | ||
| walls.py | ||
| windows.py | ||