Walked the worksheet section-by-section (dimensions, ventilation, fabric, internal/solar gains, MIT, space-heating requirement, fuel cost) against the calculator's matching intermediates. Internal gains and heat loss matched closely, but solar gains (worksheet line 83) was 2.2x off in January (56.9 W vs our 123.4 W) — traced to the Elmhurst BUILD entering all 12 real windows (3 orientations: NW 7.05 m2, NE 1.21 m2, SE 7.06 m2) as a single synthetic 15.32 m2 "North" group, understating solar gain. Verified by reproducing both build artifacts in the calculator: real windows + real Table-11 gating = 76.33 (our answer, matches lodged 76 exactly); collapsing to a synthetic single-North window + forcing Table 11 on = 72.62, reproducing Elmhurst's 72 almost exactly. Confirms neither residual is a mapping or calculator bug — one is a deliberate, regression-tested spec choice (Table 11) and the other is an artifact of how this specific Elmhurst reconciliation build was entered. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .claude/skills | ||
| .devcontainer | ||
| .github/workflows | ||
| .idea | ||
| .vscode | ||
| applications | ||
| asset_list | ||
| backend | ||
| backlog | ||
| datatypes | ||
| deployment/terraform | ||
| docs | ||
| domain | ||
| epr_data_exports | ||
| etl | ||
| harness | ||
| infrastructure | ||
| model_data/requirements | ||
| orchestration | ||
| recommendations | ||
| repositories | ||
| sap worksheets | ||
| scripts | ||
| sfr/principal_pitch | ||
| survey_report | ||
| tests | ||
| utilities | ||
| utils | ||
| .coveragerc | ||
| .dockerignore | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| ara_backend_design.md | ||
| BaseUtility.py | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| conftest.py | ||
| CONTEXT.md | ||
| devcontainer.sh | ||
| Dockerfile.test | ||
| Dockerfile.test.dockerignore | ||
| Makefile | ||
| MEMORY.md | ||
| modelling_audit.md | ||
| next_claude_prompt.txt | ||
| P960-0001-001431-2.pdf | ||
| package-lock.json | ||
| package.json | ||
| playground.py.local-backup | ||
| pyproject.toml | ||
| pyrightconfig.json | ||
| pytest.ini | ||
| README.md | ||
| run_lambda_local.sh | ||
| serverless.yml | ||
| Summary_001431-3.pdf | ||
| test.requirements.txt | ||
| tox.ini | ||
| UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md | ||
Model Repository
This repository contains the code pertaining to the development of the data science and machine learning products being utilised by Hestia.
The different folders in this repository relate to services that can be used independently, or can be imported and used as part of a larger application
Getting Started
Prerequisites
Dev Container Setup
This repo uses a Docker Compose-based dev container. The model-backend service joins a shared-dev Docker network so it can communicate with other local services (e.g. a frontend container) running on your machine.
VS Code users: The initializeCommand in devcontainer.json creates the shared-dev network automatically before the container starts. No manual step required — just open the repo and select Reopen in Container.
Non-VS Code / CI workflows: Run the following once before starting the container:
make dev-setup
This is idempotent and safe to re-run if the network already exists.
Folders
backend/
This folder contains the code for the fastapi backend service, which provides an interface to much of the functionality in this repository, for the frontend
model_data/
This folder contains related to the reading and preparation of assessment model data, including pulling out epc attributes
Testing
All tests can be run, against the configuration in pytest.ini running
pytest
This will run the complete panel of tests and report on coverage in the locations specified by the pytest.ini file.
To run tests in a specific service, e.g. inside of model_data, simply run
pytest --cov-config=model_data/.coveragerc --cov=model_data
This will produce the test results and coverage reports