mirror of
https://github.com/Hestia-Homes/Model.git
synced 2026-07-19 17:03:02 +00:00
782c686969
modelling_e2e properties with main fuel 39 failed at the price boundary (UnpricedFuelCode since #44fff767; previously mis-rated as non-electric → the ~14-SAP over-rating flagged in earlier review). Code 39 is SAP Table 12 "electricity, any tariff" (epc_codes.csv main_fuel 39 = "electricity, unspecified tariff"; spec footnote (j): defines an electric system, cost/CO2/PE = standard electricity). It was absent from API_FUEL_TO_TABLE_32, so to_table_32_code(39) was None → is_electric_fuel_code(39) False and pricing raised. Fix: map API_FUEL_TO_TABLE_32[39] = 30 (standard electricity) — the canonical place Khalim's fuel work added codes. One line makes classification, pricing, CO2/PE and the billing carrier all agree (39 → 30 → ELECTRICITY). Tests: to_table_32_code(39)==30, is_electric_fuel_code(39) True, price == standard electricity, and the billing carrier resolves to ELECTRICITY. 0 corpus impact (no lodged corpus cert uses 39); accuracy + mapper-corpus gates green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| climate | ||
| rdsap | ||
| validation | ||
| worksheet | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| test_bre_worked_examples.py | ||
| test_calculator.py | ||
| test_pcdb_etl.py | ||
| test_pcdb_lookup.py | ||
| test_pcdb_table_322_lookup.py | ||
| test_pcdb_table_323_lookup.py | ||
| test_pcdb_table_329_lookup.py | ||
| test_pcdb_table_362_lookup.py | ||
| test_postcode_weather.py | ||
| test_real_cert_sap_accuracy.py | ||
| test_table_12.py | ||
| test_table_12a.py | ||
| test_table_13.py | ||
| test_table_32.py | ||