Adds the file-backed Product catalogue — the stopgap source for costs
the ETL does not yet supply, behind the same ProductRepository port as
ProductPostgresRepository. The JSON file maps each Measure Type to its
fully-loaded unit cost; the per-Measure-Type contingency is joined from
config (not stored in the file), so config stays the single source of
truth for contingency — mirroring the Postgres repo's mapping.
Strict-raises (ValueError) on an absent measure type, a non-object
entry, or a missing/non-numeric unit_cost_per_m2, matching the
repo-wide strict-no-silent-default convention. tmp_path-backed tests,
no DB fixture needed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Records that the Elmhurst recommendation Summaries parse via the
extractor chain (not parse_site_notes_pdf), so the "parser gate" never
blocked the cascade pins. All four pins close at delta 0; loft 270→300
and the suspended-floor insulation-type field were the two gaps fixed.
Remaining: #1157 (HITL schema review) + ProductJsonRepository.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Completes #1159 end-to-end with solid and suspended-floor before/after
cascade pins on cert 001431, both closing at delta 0.000000.
Adds floor_insulation_type_str to BuildingPartOverlay (the generic
field-fold applicator picks it up with no change) and has
recommend_floor_insulation set it to "Retro-fitted". Insulating an
as-built floor re-lodges its insulation as retro-fitted; the calculator
keys on this for a suspended timber floor's sealed/unsealed
determination (cert_to_inputs.py: "retro" + no U-value supplied →
sealed). Without it the suspended-floor cascade left a +1.40 SAP gap
(the floor stayed "unsealed", wrong U-value); with it the cascade
closes exactly. Solid floors are unaffected by the seal logic and stay
at delta 0; both Elmhurst after-certs lodge "Retro-fitted", so setting
it uniformly is faithful.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Completes #1158 end-to-end. recommend_loft_insulation now emits a
300 mm overlay (was 270 mm). The Elmhurst before/after re-lodgement of
the loft-insulation measure on cert 001431 lodges the after-cert at
300 mm roof insulation; pinning before→overlay→after requires the
overlay to match that depth — at 270 mm the cascade left a +0.173 SAP
residual, at 300 mm it closes at delta 0.000000 on SAP/CO2/PE.
Adds test_loft_overlay_reproduces_the_relodged_after and updates the
roof generator unit test's thickness assertion to 300.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes#1154 — the Package Scorer's Elmhurst cascade pin. Drives
recommend_cavity_wall on the parsed `before` Summary, scores its
Option's overlay through PackageScorer, and asserts delta 0 (abs<=1e-4
on SAP/CO2/PE) vs the calculator's score on the re-lodged `after`
Summary.
Key finding: the handover's stated parser gate (parse_site_notes_pdf
throwing 'Manufacturer' on cert 001431) does NOT block these pins. The
Elmhurst recommendation Summaries route cleanly through the same
ElmhurstSiteNotesExtractor + EpcPropertyDataMapper chain the worksheet
e2e fixtures use (_elmhurst_worksheet_001431.build_epc). The Textract
path's window bug is unrelated and unused here.
The before→after field change is exactly wall_insulation_type 4
(uninsulated) → 2 (filled cavity), which is precisely the overlay
recommend_cavity_wall emits; the cascade closes at delta 0.000000 on
all three metrics. Before/after Summaries mirrored into
tests/domain/modelling/fixtures/ so the pin does not depend on the
unstaged workspace.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Captures issue status (#1153-#1161), the built compute spine, key
facts/gotchas (hand-built 000490 fixture, calculator entry, worktree-vs-main
import trap, test/commit conventions), and the two gates (parser fix -> wire
Elmhurst cascade pins; #1157 persist-Plan HITL schema review). For picking
the work back up in a fresh session.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
recommend_floor_insulation(epc, products) detects an uninsulated ground floor
(SapBuildingPart.floor_insulation_thickness blank/zero) and its construction
from floor_construction_type — 'Suspended timber' -> suspended_floor_insulation,
'Solid' -> solid_floor_insulation — emitting the matching single Option (a
floor is one construction, like a cavity wall) with the overlay
(floor_insulation_thickness = 100 mm) and a priced Cost (ground-floor area x
the Product's fully-loaded unit cost + contingency).
- building_geometry.ground_floor_area(epc, identifier): the lowest floor's
(floor == 0) area. Pinned 14.85 m^2 on 000490 MAIN.
- BuildingPartOverlay gains floor_insulation_thickness (generic Applicator
writes it unchanged). suspended (0.20) / solid (0.26) floor contingencies.
Progress on #1159 (generator + geometry); end-to-end + Elmhurst pin pending
the orchestrator (#1157) and parser. Four behaviour tests (suspended / solid
/ none / cost) + geometry pin. pyright strict clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
recommend_loft_insulation(epc, products) detects an uninsulated main loft
(SapBuildingPart.roof_insulation_thickness == 0) and emits a
Recommendation("Roof") with one loft_insulation Option carrying the overlay
(roof_insulation_thickness = 270 mm, the recommended top-up) and a priced
Cost (roof area x the Product's fully-loaded unit cost + contingency).
- building_geometry.roof_area(epc, identifier): the part's greatest
per-storey floor area (RdSAP 10 §3.8). Pinned 14.85 m^2 on 000490 MAIN.
- BuildingPartOverlay gains roof_insulation_thickness; the generic Overlay
Applicator writes it with NO change (validated by the tracer) — the
deep-module field-fold paying off.
- loft_insulation contingency (0.10) added.
Progress on #1158 (generator + geometry); end-to-end + Elmhurst pin pending
the orchestrator (#1157) and the parser fix. Four behaviour tests
(geometry pin; detect / none / cost). pyright strict clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
scoring.py adds the telescoping marginal cascade that serves two of the three
ADR-0016 scoring roles:
- marginal_impacts(scorer, baseline, overlays): applies overlays cumulatively
in order and reports each measure's marginal MeasureImpact (sap_points +
carbon/energy savings). Role 3 (final-package attribution) — the marginals
telescope EXACTLY to the whole-package total.
- independent_option_impacts(scorer, baseline, options): role 1 — scores each
Option's overlay independently vs baseline, scoring each DISTINCT overlay
once (Options sharing an overlay reuse the result). Approximate signal for
the optimiser; never surfaced as a measure's true impact.
Role 2 (whole-package re-score) is PackageScorer.score directly. Three
behaviour tests on the real Sap10Calculator / a counting stand-in (hand-built
EPD): single-overlay marginal == improvement-over-baseline; two-overlay
marginals telescope to the package total; per-Option dedup scores each
distinct overlay once. Closes#1156. pyright strict clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
PackageScorer(calculator: SapCalculator).score(baseline, simulations) folds
the Simulation Overlays onto the baseline via the Overlay Applicator and
scores the throwaway EpcPropertyData on the injected deterministic SAP
calculator, returning Score(sap_continuous, co2_kg_per_yr,
primary_energy_kwh_per_yr). Depends on the SapCalculator abstraction, not a
concrete engine. This is the reusable scoring primitive (ADR-0016) — the
same call serves the optimiser's whole-package re-score and a future live
re-score of a user-assembled plan.
Two behaviour tests against the real Sap10Calculator on a hand-built EPD:
filling the main cavity improves SAP (right-directional through the real
physics); an empty package scores the unmodified baseline (pins the
SapResult->Score mapping). The Elmhurst before/after cascade PIN (#1154's
acceptance) lands once cert 001431 parses (external _extract_windows fix).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
recommend_cavity_wall now takes a ProductRepository and prices the Measure
Option: Cost(total = gross_heat_loss_wall_area(MAIN) x product.unit_cost_per_m2,
contingency_rate = product.contingency_rate). Detection is unchanged and runs
before pricing, so ineligible walls still return None without a catalogue hit.
Completes #1155 — the cavity-wall Recommendation Generator now detects an
uninsulated main cavity wall and emits a priced Option carrying the filled-
cavity overlay. Four behaviour tests (detection x3 + fully-loaded cost).
pyright strict clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Product(measure_type, unit_cost_per_m2, contingency_rate). ProductRepository
is the DDD port abstracting the catalogue source; ProductPostgresRepository
reads the externally-owned material table (defensive SQLModel view
MaterialRow) and maps an active row to a Product — total_cost becomes the
fully-loaded unit_cost_per_m2 — joining the per-measure-type contingency
(contingencies.py, mirrors Costs.CONTINGENCIES; cavity 0.10). Strict-raise
on missing/inactive row. A JSON-backed impl will follow behind the same
port for ETL-gap costs.
Two DB tests against an ephemeral Postgres (map active row; raise on
inactive-only). Toward #1155 cost (4b). Also generalises the CONTEXT
Simulation Overlay wording: windows are targeted by index, building-part
association carried via window_location (_window_bp_index). pyright clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Summary PDFs preprocessed from `pdftotext -layout` wrap the windows-table
header across several lines. The third header line's tail ("U value / g
value / Draught Proofed / Permanent Shutters") tokenises to "value value
Proofed Shutters" and lands directly above the FIRST window's data row.
Because the first window in a building part has `before_start = 0`, its
prefix block reaches back into that header remnant. The remnant is
neither an orientation nor a building-part fragment, so it survived the
pops in `_compose_window_descriptors` and leaked into glazing_type as
"value value Proofed Shutters Double between 2002 and 2021" (windows 2-3,
whose prefix starts after the previous window's manufacturer line, were
clean).
Fix: the glazing-type phrase always starts with a glazing-start word
(Single/Double/Triple/Secondary), so trim any prefix fragments preceding
that word before joining the glazing type. Orientation/bp pops still run
on the full prefix, so they are unaffected.
Reproduced from `sap worksheets/Recommendations Elmhurst Files/
cavity_wall_insulation - main wall/before/Summary_001431.pdf`. Added a
regression test driving the real `_extract_windows_from_layout` path with
the verbatim tokenised header+rows. 2306 passed (+4), pyright net-zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
domain/building_geometry.gross_heat_loss_wall_area(epc, identifier) sums
heat_loss_perimeter x room_height across a building part's storeys — the
heat-loss wall area (party walls excluded by construction), not total
wall area. Lives outside the calculator so Modelling cost quantities can
reuse it; the calculator computes the same quantity inline today and
should be DRY'd onto this later (coordinated with the calculator branch).
Pinned at 45.93 m^2 against the 000490 MAIN part. Toward #1155 cost
(behaviour 4). pyright strict clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
recommend_cavity_wall(epc) detects an uninsulated main cavity wall
(wall_construction=4, wall_insulation_type=4) and emits a Recommendation
whose single Measure Option carries the Simulation Overlay setting MAIN
wall_insulation_type=2 (Table 6 'Filled cavity'; cf. domain/sap10_ml/
rdsap_uvalues.py u_wall). Returns None for already-insulated or
non-cavity main walls.
Recommendation/MeasureOption reshaped per design review: the target is
encoded in the Option's overlay (addresses a building part / window /
system), not a typed key on Recommendation — generalises to glazing and
heating without changing the type. CONTEXT partition wording generalised
to match.
Three behaviour tests (hand-built EPD, no PDF). Cost (behaviour 4 of
#1155) outstanding — needs net heat-loss wall area + ProductRepository.
WIP on #1155. pyright strict clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds the user-simulated 001431 case (the cert that drove S0380.189/.190)
as an Elmhurst-only e2e fixture: Summary PDF → extractor → mapper →
calculator, every Block-1 SapResult field pinned against the
P960-0001-001431 worksheet at abs=1e-4. All 11 pins pass with zero
residual — the case is clean, confirming the S0380.190 gas-combi fuel
derivation closes the Summary path natively.
Verified the handover's flagged "+0.0007 SAP" was a target artifact, not
a cascade gap: the worksheet displays ECF (257) rounded to 1.6047 and
integer SAP (258)=78; the cascade's continuous SAP is computed from the
UNROUNDED ECF = (255)*(256)/((4)+45) = 660.9750*0.4200/173.0, giving
77.6147 — which matches the worksheet's own unrounded value. Pinning the
continuous SAP from the display-rounded ECF (→ 77.6144) was the wrong
target. Block-1 line refs all match exactly: (211) 10699.7225, (219)
3327.1592, (231) 86.0, (232) 283.2229, (255) 660.9750, (272) 3000.1664,
Σ(98) 8987.7669.
Summary mirrored into the tracked fixtures dir as
Summary_001431_gas_combi.pdf (distinct name — the corpus reuses cert
001431 across every heating variant); source Summary + worksheet tracked
under sap worksheets/golden fixture debugging/ as the pin ground truth.
2302 passed (+11), 0 failed; pyright net-zero on new/changed files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The newer Elmhurst Summary export lodges a gas combi as §14.0 "Fuel Type"
empty + "Main Heating SAP Code" 104 (EES "BGW"), with no fuel string. The
site-notes mapper left `main_fuel_type=''`, so `cert_to_inputs` raised
`MissingMainFuelType` — blocking the whole gas-combi Summary path
(reproduced on the simulated 001431 case).
SAP 10.2 Table 4b (PDF p.168) rows 101-119 are "Gas boilers (including
mains gas, LPG and biogas)": the code fixes the boiler type/efficiency but
NOT the carrier, so 104 alone can't distinguish mains gas from LPG. The
disambiguator is §15.0 "Water Heating Fuel Type" — a combi/boiler heats
space + water from one appliance — exactly mirroring the existing
liquid-fuel (codes 120-141) fallback. `_elmhurst_gas_boiler_main_fuel`
adopts the §15.0 carrier only when the SAP code is in 101-119 AND §15.0
resolves to a gas/LPG fuel, so a regular boiler + electric immersion
(§15.0 = "Electricity") still strict-raises rather than mis-billing gas
as electric.
2291 passed (+1), 0 failed; pyright net-zero on both files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
EpcSimulation is the Simulation Overlay — a narrow all-optional partial
mirror of EpcPropertyData/SapBuildingPart (wall surface first), targeting
building parts by BuildingPartIdentifier (composition, not inheritance).
apply_simulations(baseline, simulations) deep-copies the baseline, folds
overlays in order (later wins on a shared field) via a generic non-None
field write, and returns a throwaway EpcPropertyData for the calculator;
the baseline is never mutated.
Four behaviour tests (hand-built EPD from the 000490 fixture, no PDF):
targeted-write-leaves-others-untouched, empty-overlay no-op, sequential
last-wins, baseline-immutability. pyright strict clean.
Slice 1 of the Modelling stage rebuild (ADR-0016). Closes#1153.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reframe Recommendation as a target surface (partitions the EpcPropertyData
surface, so selected overlays never collide); add Measure Option,
Simulation Overlay (EpcSimulation), Product, Cost, Contingency, and
Measure Dependency. ADR-0016 fixes the scoring/optimisation approach
(warm-start grouped-knapsack MILP -> deterministic package re-score ->
greedy repair, with a final-package marginal cascade for display
attribution), resolving the open question in ADR-0005 §14.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Point-in-time note for the next agent: what S0380.185-189 shipped (worksheet
PE/CO2 pins, the two D_PV electricity-vs-gain fixes, and the thermal-mass-
parameter Table 22 fix), the per-line diagnosis template, the two worksheet-
block / gains-vs-solar traps, and the ranked open slices (Summary-path fuel
derivation first, then pin the simulated 001431 case, then cert 6035).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The §7 mean-internal-temperature cascade hardcoded the thermal mass parameter
(TMP) to 250 kJ/m²K at all 5 call sites, ignoring construction. RdSAP 10
§5.16 Table 22 (PDF p.48) makes TMP construction-dependent:
100 kJ/m²K — timber frame, cob, park home (regardless of internal
insulation); OR masonry (stone/solid brick/cavity/system
built) WITH internal insulation.
250 kJ/m²K — masonry WITHOUT internal insulation.
A too-high TMP inflates the §7 time constant τ = Cm/(3.6·H) (e.g. 40 h vs
16 h), under-cuts the temperature reduction between heating periods, and
over-states mean internal temperature → over-states space heating.
`_thermal_mass_parameter_kj_per_m2_k(epc)` classifies the MAIN building's
wall via the RdSAP `wall_construction` codes (5/7/8 = timber/cob/park) and
`wall_insulation_type` codes (3/7 = internal); unknown/curtain fall back to
the masonry 250 (no regression on unlisted classes). 17-case parametrised
test covers every Table 22 branch.
Diagnosis (per-line walk vs the user-simulated 001431 worksheet, same
archetype as golden cert 6035): fabric (26-37), internal gains (73), climate
(96)m and HTC (39) all EXACT; the entire +8.78 PE / -1.76 SAP gap was §7 MIT
(92) +0.71 °C, traced to TMP 250 vs Table 22's 100 (solid brick WITH internal
insulation). Fix closes the simulated case to 1e-4 on PE and CO2.
Blast radius: only golden cert 6035 re-pins (solid brick + internal
insulation) — SAP resid -6 → -2, PE +46.42 → +19.16, CO2 +1.07 → +0.42. The
47 dr87 cohort, 6 U985 fixtures and 41-variant heating corpus are all
masonry-no-internal → TMP unchanged at 250, all still pass. 2290 pass
(+17 new), 0 fail; pyright net-zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A single durable doc so agents can pick up the calculator without reading
historical handovers: (1) the accuracy bar for the two input paths
(site-notes 1e-4 vs worksheet; API 1e-4 when a worksheet exists, ±0.5
register fallback otherwise; cross-mapper parity); (2) the per-line-walk
debugging loop incl. comparing site-notes vs API; (3) the tools &
pipeline (Summary PDF → extractor → from_elmhurst_site_notes →
cert_to_inputs → calculate_sap_from_inputs → SapResult, plus the API
from_api_response front-end, section helpers, and where the test vectors
live). Pointer added from SAP_CALCULATOR.md; HANDOVER_* flagged as
point-in-time notes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 Appendix M1 §3a (p.93) defines PV-eligible demand as
D_PV,m = E_L,m + E_A,m + E_cook,m + E_ES,m + (231)·n_m/365 + E_space,m + E_water,m
where E_L,m is the lighting ELECTRICITY (Appendix L eq L10, = line (232)).
The cascade fed `internal_gains_result.lighting_monthly_w` — the L12 internal
heat GAIN G_L,m = E_L,m × 0.85 ("assuming 15%" of lighting energy does not
become internal heat) — into D_PV, understating it by 15% of lighting on
every PV cert. That depressed the monthly β onsite/export split and
under-credited PV primary energy uniformly across the year.
Same gain-vs-electricity class as the cooking fix S0380.73 (L18 gain vs L20
electricity). Fix: scale the (shape-identical) lighting gain profile to the
annual E_L `lighting_kwh_per_yr` (= (232)), mirroring the (219)m hot-water
scale-to-annual. Magnitude-only, so the shape-weighted lighting CO2/PE
effective factor (Σkwh×f/Σkwh, magnitude-invariant) is unchanged; appliances
need no scaling (G_A = E_A, no 0.85). Diagnosis was empirical first (calc
lighting D_PV 95.1 vs worksheet (232) 111.88, ratio exactly 0.85) then
confirmed against the spec text (L9d/L10/L12, M1 §3a).
Impact (calc − full-precision dr87 worksheet): ALL 47 worksheet certs now
match at <1e-4 on BOTH PE (max |Δ| 0.0000 kWh/m²) and CO2 (max |Δ| 0.0000 kg)
— the convergence target, met cohort-wide. Combined with S0380.187 this
closes the entire gas+PV + ASHP PV residual. Re-pinned 47 worksheet residuals
to 0.0000 and 31 drifted lodged residuals (PV certs). SAP integers unchanged;
chain SAP 1e-4 intact (164 pass). 2273 pass, 0 regressions; pyright net-zero.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The PV onsite/export β-split (SAP 10.2 Appendix M1 §3a, p.93) divides PV
generation by the monthly PV-eligible electricity demand D_PV,m. The cascade
included main and water electricity (when those fuels are electric) but had
no term for SECONDARY space heating. For the 10 cohort-2 gas-main +
electric-secondary + PV certs, the (215)m secondary electric fuel was dropped
from D_PV,m — understating demand in the heating months only, depressing the
monthly β, and under-crediting onsite PV primary energy.
Spec: Appendix M1 §3a counts E_space,m as the dwelling's TOTAL electric
space-heating demand; for a gas-main/electric-secondary dwelling that is the
secondary fuel. Diagnosis was decisive: E_PV (generation) matched the
worksheet exactly every month, the onsite (233a) split diverged ONLY in
heating months (Jun-Sep near-exact), and all 10 affected certs have PV while
all clean gas certs have none. Empirically adding (215)m to D_PV closed cert
3136 onsite 726.9 → 790.3 (worksheet 792.1).
Impact (calc − full-precision dr87 worksheet), the 10 certs:
PE +0.5..+1.5 → +0.02..+0.046 kWh/m²; CO2 −0.5..−1.1 → +0.002..+0.0095 kg.
The whole 47-cert cohort now matches at PE <0.05 / CO2 <0.025. SAP integers
unchanged; chain SAP 1e-4 pins intact (164 pass). The uniform ~0.03 PE remnant
on PV certs is the separate (233a)/(233b) summer-month D_PV discrepancy.
Re-pinned the 10 worksheet + 9 lodged golden residuals (improvements).
2273 pass, 0 regressions; pyright net-zero (file's 32 errors pre-existing).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The existing golden test compares calc PE/CO2 against the integer-rounded
lodged register values (energy_consumption_current / co2_emissions_current),
which conflates real calculator gaps with register rounding. This adds a
parallel pin against each cert's Elmhurst dr87 worksheet (286)/(272) at full
precision — a clean calculator-vs-Elmhurst signal for the 47 worksheet-backed
certs (9 ASHP + 38 cohort-2).
Findings at capture (calc − worksheet, on the worksheet's own decimal TFA):
- 37/47 exact on both PE (<0.05 kWh/m²) and CO2 (<0.02 kg).
- 10 higher-consumption gas certs carry PE +0.5..+1.5 kWh/m² AND
CO2 -0.5..-1.1 kg simultaneously. PE-over + CO2-under on the same
certs is the fingerprint of a small gas→electricity fuel-split
difference (elec PE 1.51 > gas 1.13, but elec CO2 0.136 < gas 0.21),
not a factor-value error — next slice candidate.
An earlier "41/47 PE gaps" reading was a JSON-integer-TFA division artifact;
comparing on the worksheet's decimal TFA (which the calculator also uses)
collapses it to the real 10. Worksheet values frozen as literals (the dr87
PDFs are untracked, so not parsed at test time) per the worksheet_unrounded_sap
convention. Also replaced a pre-existing pytest.approx with abs-diff to keep
the file at zero pyright errors (feedback_abs_diff_over_pytest_approx).
106 passed (was 59); pyright 0 errors.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CH6's P960 worksheet input lodges Distribution Loss = "Two adjoining
dwellings sharing a single heating system" → (306) DLF = 1.0000, vs CH4's
"Calculated" → 1.5 → (306) = 1.4500. That DLF choice swings SAP/cost/CO2/PE
materially, but it is NOT present in the Summary PDF that the corpus pipeline
consumes (Summary → ElmhurstSiteNotesExtractor → mapper → calculator).
Proven empirically with a user-supplied controlled pair (CH adjoined
dwellings/Summary_001431 (1) vs (2)): the two Summaries are byte-identical
across every RdSAP INPUT field, differing only in the derived header
(SAP 80 vs 75, bill £954 vs £1237, emissions 5.407 vs 7.394 t). A
case-insensitive scan of the CH6 Summary for "distribution"/"adjoin" returns
0 hits. Since CH4/CH6 Summaries are themselves identical bar fuel type, no
Summary-derivable rule can yield CH4=1.45 AND CH6=1.0.
Doc-only change (comment in _EXPECTATIONS); 20/20 community-heating corpus
tests pass. Closes the CH6 re-litigation: pin held.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The PropertyBaselineOrchestrator now reads the current Fuel Rates snapshot
once per batch, builds a BillDerivation, and prices each scored property's
SapResult -> EnergyBreakdown into a Bill carried on PropertyBaselinePerformance
(None only on the stub no-calculator path). The Bill is flattened onto nullable
bill_* flat columns (per-section kwh+cost, standing charges, SEG credit, total)
on the postgres table, with bill_total_annual_bill_gbp as the not-null
discriminator on read-back. Section absent from the bill stays None, not 0.
Updated all four orchestrator construction sites to inject the FuelRatesRepository
port (handler + three test sites), and the FE migration doc to reflect the
prefixed columns and that they are now populated.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 worksheet block 12b/13b (367)/(467) for a community heating
electric heat pump (Table 4a code 304 → Table 12 fuel 41 "heat from
electric heat pump"). The HP meters grid electricity, so per Table 12
note (s)/(t) + block 12b/13b footnote (a) its emission/PE factor is the
MONTHLY Table 12d/12e cascade (fuel 41 = standard-electricity profile),
weighted by the network heat profile, then × 1/heat-source-eff (1/COP):
(367)/(467) = [(307)+(310)] / COP × Σ((307+310)_m × factor_m)/Σ(...)
Per-line walk of CH3 (the displayed (367) 0.1535 / (467) 1.5717 are PDF
artifacts; the (373)/(473) totals reconcile only with):
CO2 factor = 0.15040 (monthly Table 12d wtd) vs cascade annual 0.136
PE factor = 1.55692 (monthly Table 12e wtd) vs cascade annual 1.501
Pre-slice the cascade routed code 304 through the non-electric branch
(`_co2_factor_kg_per_kwh(main) × 1/COP` = annual × scaling). New
`_is_heat_network_electric_main` (heat-network main whose fuel has a
Table 12d monthly set — i.e. fuel 41) routes all four factor helpers
(main + HW, CO2 + PE) through the monthly cascade × 1/COP. Non-electric
heat networks (gas 51 / oil 53 / coal 54) have no monthly set → annual
path unchanged (CH1, CH6 untouched).
Closure (CH3 was already SAP+cost EXACT):
CH3 (HP/Elec) CO2 −75.32→+0.0000 (= [(307+310)/3]×(0.1504−0.136)),
PE −249.32→−0.0000 (× (1.5569−1.501)) — FULLY EXACT
Corpus now 40/41 EXACT on all four metrics. Only CH6 remains: its
worksheet lodges a manual DLF=1.0 ("two adjoining dwellings") absent
from the Summary PDF (byte-identical to CH4 bar fuel type) — an
architectural limit, not a cascade gap. 2226 pass + 1 skip + 0 fail
(tolerances 1e-4 all metrics); pyright net-zero 43→43.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Rebaseliner is the assemble-and-score step (ADR-0013 amendment); its
SapResult is the scored picture that Bill Derivation also prices (ADR-0014),
so rebaseline() now returns a RebaselineResult{effective, reason, sap_result}
instead of (Performance, reason). CalculatorRebaseliner sets sap_result on
both branches (the bill prices it whether lodged or calculated figures win);
StubRebaseliner returns sap_result=None (runs no calculator). Orchestrator
unpacks the result; the bill wiring lands in the next slice.
Also refreshes the stale ML-era docstrings in rebaseliner.py to the
assemble-and-score model (the calculator, not ML, is the rebaseliner
mechanism per ADR-0013).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 §10b: hot water for a community-heating dwelling bills at the
heat-network rate, not the cert-lodged fuel. Elmhurst §15.0 lodges
`water_heating_fuel_type = "Mains gas"` (3.48 p/kWh) as a placeholder on
community certs; the worksheet (342) Water-heating cost = (310) × the
S0380.171 CHP heat-fraction blend — the SAME rate as space heating (340).
Per-line walk of the CH2 block 10b:
(340) space = 11837.83 × 0.037955 = 449.3047 (cascade EXACT)
(342) water = 3854.12 × 0.037955 = 146.2830 (cascade billed
3854.12 × 0.0348 = 134.12 → −£12.16, the whole residual)
(350) lighting + (351) standing → (355) 754.1502.
`_hot_water_fuel_cost_gbp_per_kwh`'s `inherit_main_for_community_heating`
path already routes HW cost through `_fuel_cost_gbp_per_kwh(main)` (the
CHP blend), but its gate `_is_community_heating_hw_from_main` excluded
code 302. S0380.182 wired the 302 CO2/PE credit via
`_heat_network_code_302_effective_factor`, which intercepts the HW
CO2/PE helpers ABOVE this predicate's branch — so extending the
predicate to include 302 now affects ONLY the cost path.
Closures:
CH2 (CHP/Gas) SAP +0.5277→−0.0000, cost −£12.16→−£0.00 — FULLY EXACT
CH4 (CHP/Oil) SAP +0.5277→−0.0000, cost −£12.16→−£0.00 — FULLY EXACT
CH6 (CHP/Coal) SAP −7.49→−8.02, cost +£172.68→+£184.84 — its HW now
also bills the blend, compounding the DLF=1.0 quirk
(cascade DLF=1.45); same separate CH6 DLF front.
Corpus now 39 variants EXACT on all four metrics (CH2/CH4 join). Open:
CH3 CO2/PE (code-304 community-HP COP), CH6 all-metric (DLF=1.0 manual
override the Summary doesn't carry). 2225 pass + 1 skip + 0 fail
(tolerances 1e-4 all metrics); pyright net-zero 32→32.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The SapResult -> EnergyBreakdown adapter (ADR-0014), a classmethod on the
target mirroring Performance.from_sap_result. Folds each positive per-end-use
delivered kWh into a billable EnergyLine: main/main-2/secondary heating and
hot water at their resolved fuel (sap_code_to_fuel); lighting/pumps-fans/
appliances/cooking/cooling as electricity. PV export carries to exported_kwh
for the SEG credit. Zero-kWh end uses emit no line; a positive kWh with no
fuel code raises rather than billing at a default (strict, mirrors the
calculator).
Adds BillSection.COOLING (electricity, from space_cooling_fuel_kwh_per_yr).
BillDerivation already prices any section it is given, so no change there.
Also corrects the ADR-0014 amendment: SapResult carries the calculator's own
fuel codes (raw API or Table-32 per mapper, ADR-0015); sap_fuel normalizes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The fuel codes the calculator now puts on SapResult are its own codes — raw
gov-API enums or already-Table-32, depending on the source mapper (ADR-0015).
sap_code_to_fuel now runs the code through table_32.to_table_32_code
(promoted from private _to_table_32_code) — T32-first, then API-translate,
the SAME normalization the calculator's pricing/CO2 helpers use — before the
Table-32 -> Fuel dispatch, so the bill's carrier matches what the calculator
billed (incl. the API/T32 collision codes, e.g. 20 = wood-logs not heat-net).
Falls back to the raw code for billing fuels the price table omits (the 41-58
heat-network range), which resolve to HEAT_NETWORK -> UnpricedFuel — stricter
than, and intentionally divergent from, the calculator's lossy
default-to-mains-gas for an unpriced code (ADR-0014 §5).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 worksheet block 12b (CO2) / 13b (PE) for community heating
"CHP and boilers" (SAP code 302). Per unit of network heat fuel
H = (307)+(310) the effective generation factor is:
chp×100/(362)×f_fuel − chp×(361)/(362)×f_disp + (1−chp)×100/(367)×f_fuel
(363)/(463) CHP fuel = chp_frac × 100/heat_eff × f_fuel
(364)/(464) less credit = −chp_frac × elec_eff/heat_eff × f_disp
(368)/(468) boiler fuel = (1−chp_frac) × 100/boiler_eff × f_fuel
f_fuel = Table 12 heat-network fuel factor (the CHP unit and the back-up
boilers burn the same community fuel — verified vs CH2 gas / CH4 oil /
CH6 coal worksheets (363)/(368)); f_disp = Table 12f (PDF p.196) credit
for the CHP-generated electricity. RdSAP 10 §C (p.58) defaults: heat eff
50% (362), electrical eff 25% (361), boiler eff 80% (367); CHP heat frac
0.35 per-cert via community_heating_chp_fraction.
New `_heat_network_code_302_effective_factor` + Table 12f flexible
constants (0.420 CO2 / 2.369 PE) + RdSAP §C efficiency constants, wired
into all four factor helpers (main + HW, CO2 + PE) ahead of the existing
single-fuel / 1-over-heat-source-eff path. The worksheet (368)/(468)
boiler emissions DISPLAY rounded/mis-aligned in the PDF, but the
(373)/(473)/(386)/(486) totals reconcile only with the boiler at the
full Table 12 factor — verified EXACT.
Two spec citations applied:
- Table 12f flexible-operation default for RdSAP community CHP is an
Elmhurst engine choice (Table 12f notes make "standard" the default);
mirrored per [[feedback-software-no-special-handling]] and documented
in SAP_CALCULATOR.md §8.3.
- Table 12 heat-network oil/biodiesel CO2 (codes 53/56) corrected
0.298 → 0.335 per Table 12 (p.189) "assumes 'gas oil'"; the code-302
oil cascade (CH4) was the first to exercise it. PE 1.180 was already
correct. No other variant uses these codes (no regression).
Closures (CO2 + PE only — the CHP credit does not touch cost/SAP):
CH2 (CHP/Gas) CO2 −1411.49→+0.0000, PE +1331.23→+0.0000 EXACT
CH4 (CHP/Oil) CO2 −4378.24→−0.0000, PE +319.81→−0.0000 EXACT
CH6 (CHP/Coal) CO2/PE re-pinned (+2411.54 / +5023.48) — its worksheet
lodges a manual DLF=1.0 the Summary doesn't carry, so
cascade DLF=1.45 over-scales H; same root as the CH6
SAP −7.49 / cost +£172 (separate DLF front).
CH2/CH4 are now CO2+PE-exact but still carry the heat-network cost/SAP
residual (+0.5277 SAP / −£12.16 cost, exposed by S0380.175 — cost-side,
untouched here). CH3 unchanged (code 304 community-HP COP front).
Corpus state: 37 variants EXACT on all four metrics (incl. CH1);
remaining residuals are CH2/CH4 cost+SAP, CH3 CO2+PE (HP COP), CH6
all-metric (DLF quirk). 2223 pass + 1 skip + 0 fail (tolerances 1e-4 all
metrics per S0380.181); pyright net-zero 43→43.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ADR-0014 BillDerivation attributes each end-use (HEATING / HOT_WATER /
SECONDARY / APPLIANCES / COOKING) to a fuel carrier and credits PV
export. SapResult already carried the per-end-use kWh but not WHICH
fuel each end-use burns, nor the annual exported kWh — so a downstream
SapResult->EnergyBreakdown adapter could not pick the right tariff.
Surfaces five output-only fields, threaded exactly like the recently
merged appliances/cooking change (2f039aeb):
main_heating_fuel_code RdSAP10 Table 32 / SAP 10.2 Table 12 fuel
main_2_heating_fuel_code code column (the lodged fuel code, e.g.
secondary_heating_fuel_code mains gas 26). None when the corresponding
hot_water_fuel_code system is absent / fuel not resolvable.
pv_exported_kwh_per_yr SAP 10.2 Appendix M1 §3-4 annual export kWh
(0.0 when no PV).
cert_to_inputs.py populates the four fuel codes from the existing
resolvers the cost/CO2 cascade already uses — `_main_fuel_code`,
`_secondary_fuel_code`, `_water_heating_fuel_code` (not reinvented);
Main 2 is the second `main_heating_details` entry, guarded for length.
There is a single CalculatorInputs construction site (cert_to_demand_
inputs delegates to cert_to_inputs). `pv_exported_kwh_per_yr` already
existed on CalculatorInputs; SapResult collapses its Optional to 0.0.
HARD CONSTRAINT honoured — output-only, zero rating drift. These fields
do NOT feed ECF / total_fuel_cost_gbp / co2_kg_per_yr / primary_energy_*
/ sap_score / any monthly value. Every golden-fixture, Elmhurst e2e
SapResult pin, section cascade pin, and heating-corpus residual stays
byte-identical: calculator suite 1658 -> 1661 passed (+3 new tests),
4 skipped, 0 failed before and after. pyright net-zero (51 -> 51 in
domain/; no new errors in the touched test files).
New tests: a synthetic threading test (four fuel codes + PV export pass
unchanged through calculate_sap_from_inputs; None PV collapses to 0.0)
and a cert-level pin (mains-gas combi cert 000516 -> main fuel code 26,
no Main 2, secondary 30, HW 26). Synthetic CalculatorInputs / SapResult
fixtures updated for the new SapResult fields (defaults cover Inputs).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The corpus residual-pin tolerances had drifted looser than the comment
above them claimed ("pin at 1e-4 relative to lodged precision"): SAP was
1e-3, cost ±£0.01, CO2 ±0.1 kg, PE ±0.1 kWh. A ±0.1 kg CO2 band could
silently mask a ~0.09 kg drift on a variant we report as EXACT.
The worksheet pins are extracted from the P960 PDF text, which prints
4 d.p., so the hard residual floor is ~5e-5 (half a unit in the last
printed digit) regardless of cascade precision. 1e-4 sits just above
that floor. All 41 variants hold at uniform 1e-4 on continuous SAP,
cost, CO2 AND PE — confirming the 37 EXACT variants are genuinely exact
to PDF print-rounding and the looser bands were masking nothing.
Aligns the guard with [[feedback-zero-error-strict]] /
[[feedback-continuous-sap-tolerance]] (basically zero error across all
four metrics). Test-only change; no cascade behaviour touched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Captures a /grill-with-docs session resolving how BillDerivation gets the
fuel each end use burns, and what Rebaselining actually is.
- ADR-0014 amendment: per-end-use fuel is a calculator OUTPUT (resolved
Table-32 codes on SapResult: main-1/main-2/secondary/HW + pv_exported_kwh);
the adapter is a pure SapResult->EnergyBreakdown map. Corrects stale §3
(is_gas_code... -> sap_fuel.sap_code_to_fuel). Adds COOLING section.
Interim, pending ADR-0015.
- ADR-0013 amendment: the calculator is the SCORING ENGINE within
Rebaselining (assemble the Effective EPC picture, then score), not the
whole of it; the Rebaseliner exposes its SapResult so the orchestrator
composes Effective Performance AND the Bill from one scoring.
- ADR-0015 (new): mappers own cert normalization; EpcPropertyData becomes a
strict type. Explains why fuel resolution sits in the calculator today.
- CONTEXT.md: Effective EPC = the assembled picture; Rebaselining = assemble
(overrides / neighbour-estimation / old-schema remap) then score.
- EpcPropertyData docstring points at ADR-0015.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SAP 10.2 Appendix C §C3.2 (PDF p.51), verbatim: "CO2 emissions and
Primary Energy associated with the electricity used for pumping water
through the distribution system are allowed for by adding electrical
energy equal to 1% of the energy required for space and water heating."
Worksheet line (313) = 0.01 × [(307)+(310)]; its CO2 (372) and PE (472)
bill on the Table 12d/12e monthly factors for fuel code 50 ("electricity
for pumping in distribution network"), weighted by the monthly heat
profile per worksheet footnote (a). (307)m/(310)m = (space_demand +
hw_output) / efficiency (the cascade models a heat network's generator
efficiency as 1/DLF).
This un-defers the (372)/(472) front the post-S0380.179 handover flagged
"don't guess until the factor source is identified": the source is
§C3.2 + Table 12d/12e code 50, NOT an empirical constant. The apparent
0.1994/0.2114 "factor" is an Elmhurst DISPLAY artifact — the worksheet
shows the (372) energy column as 0.01×(307) (space only) while computing
emissions on 0.01×(307+310) per the §C3.2 text. Verified EXACT line-by-
line against the CH2 corpus worksheet: (372)=23.6007 CO2 (rating),
(472)=208.2267 PE (demand).
New `_heat_network_distribution_electricity` helper (gated on
`_is_heat_network_main`) precomputes the energy + effective CO2/PE
factors; three new CalculatorInputs fields + calculator.py CO2/PE
summation terms (0.0/None → no-op for individually-heated certs).
Closures:
CH1 (Boilers/Gas) CO2 −23.60→−0.00, PE −208.23→+0.00 — FULLY EXACT
CH3 (HP/Elec) CO2 −98.92→−75.32, PE −457.54→−249.32 (distribution
component closed; code-304 community-HP COP remains)
CH2/CH4/CH6 gain their (372)/(472) component (CO2 +23.6, PE
+208.2); dominant CHP displaced-electricity credit
residual (Table 12f + block 12b/13b) is next slice.
No regression on the other 36 corpus variants (helper returns None off
heat-network mains) + golden + U985 fixtures. 2223 pass + 1 skip + 0
fail; pyright net-zero 43→43.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Captures the corpus state (36 EXACT + 5 pinned community-heating
variants), the SAP 302 CHP credit cluster as the highest-leverage
remaining front, the unresolved 0.8523 / 0.1994 worksheet-factor
mysteries to per-line-walk before hypothesising, and — importantly —
the new test layout (tests/domain/sap10_calculator/) that changes every
verification command.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
PR feedback: adapters here are <aggregate>_<backend>_repository (e.g.
property_baseline_postgres_repository). Rename the fuel-rates adapter to
match — file static_file_fuel_rates_repository.py ->
fuel_rates_static_file_repository.py and class StaticFileFuelRatesRepository
-> FuelRatesStaticFileRepository, plus its test. git mv preserves history.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
PR feedback: the threshold constants were obscure. Rename to state intent —
_SAP10_2_FLOOR -> _MIN_TRUSTED_SAP_VERSION, _SAP_ABS_TOL ->
_MAX_SAP_SCORE_DIVERGENCE, _REL_TOL -> _MAX_RELATIVE_DIVERGENCE — matching
the existing _log_divergence vocabulary, and fold the rationale into the
comments: the calculator emits a continuous SAP score vs the lodged rounded
integer, so a gap up to 0.5 is rounding, beyond it a genuine disagreement
worth recording; CO2/PEUI are not rounded so they get a 1% relative band.
Behaviour unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The calculator tests lived under domain/sap10_calculator/{tests,worksheet/
tests,rdsap/tests,climate/tests,validation/tests}, none of which are in
pytest.ini testpaths — so CI (which collects tests/) never ran them. Relocate
all five dirs to tests/domain/sap10_calculator/{,worksheet,rdsap,climate,
validation}, mirroring the tests/domain/property_baseline/ convention, so the
cascade-pin / golden / e2e conformance suites run in CI.
Mechanics:
- git mv preserves history (110 files).
- Flattening the trailing /tests keeps each file's depth-to-repo-root
identical, so all 16 repo-root parents[4] fixture refs stay valid. Only
test_pcdb_etl.py's parents[1] (→ pcdb data) and one hardcoded absolute
golden-fixture path in test_cert_to_inputs.py needed rebasing.
- Cross-imports rewritten domain.sap10_calculator.worksheet.tests →
tests.domain.sap10_calculator.worksheet (21 files incl. the external
importer backend/documents_parser/tests/test_summary_pdf_mapper_chain.py).
- Golden-fixture path strings in test_summary_pdf_mapper_chain.py +
scripts/fetch_cohort2_api_jsons.py updated to the new location (the JSONs
moved with the rdsap tests).
load_cells / gitignored worksheet xlsx: the xlsx-pinned tests (test_dimensions
/ ventilation / water_heating) read 2026-05-19-17-18 RdSap10Worksheet.xlsx,
which is gitignored (.gitignore `*.xlsx`) and so absent in CI. _xlsx_loader.
load_cells now pytest.skip()s when the file is absent, so those tests run
locally and skip cleanly in CI instead of erroring — no new CI failures from
the move, and the gitignore policy is respected.
Verified: tests/domain/sap10_calculator + backend/documents_parser +
tests/domain/property_baseline = 2248 pass, 1 skipped; pyright resolves the
new import paths with zero import-resolution errors.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
test_heating_systems_corpus.py (and one pcdb-1 cross-check in
test_cert_to_inputs.py) read the 001431 controlled-variable corpus PDFs
directly at runtime from `sap worksheets/heating systems examples/`, but
that directory was never committed — it was supplied locally on
2026-05-30 and only ever existed on dev machines. CI therefore errored
with "no Summary PDF in …" for all 57 corpus variants.
Commit the 82 corpus PDFs (41 populated variant folders × Summary +
P960, 4.7 MB) in place so the cascade-vs-worksheet residual pins run in
CI, matching the existing convention where the U985 / 000565
conformance fixtures are committed under
backend/documents_parser/tests/fixtures/ (31 PDFs already tracked).
Only the .pdf fixtures are added; the stray .DS_Store and a P960 .txt
dump in pcdb 1/ are left untracked.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
