RdSAP10 `wall_construction == 6` is canonically WALL_SYSTEM_BUILT, but the gov-EPC basement heuristic hijacked it: Elmhurst lodges both "SY System build" and "B Basement wall" as code 6, so a system-built wall was mis-flagged `main_wall_is_basement` and routed to the RdSAP §5.17 `u_basement_wall` override instead of the system-built U-value table. System-built stays on its canonical code 6; the basement signal moves to an explicit `is_basement` (SapAlternativeWall) / `wall_is_basement` (SapBuildingPart) Optional[bool] flag, set by the Elmhurst mapper from the distinct "SY"/"B" codes via `_elmhurst_wall_is_basement` (True for B, False for SY, None otherwise). The `main_wall_is_basement` / `is_basement_wall` properties honour the flag when set and fall back to the gov-EPC API code-6 heuristic when None — so the API path (basement lodged as integer 6, no flag) and the cert 000565 "B" cohort are unchanged. Acceptance (a recommendation-summary generator depends on it): a system-built MAIN wall reports wall_construction == 6 AND main_wall_is_basement is False; a genuine basement main wall still reports main_wall_is_basement is True. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .devcontainer | ||
| .github/workflows | ||
| .idea | ||
| .vscode | ||
| applications | ||
| asset_list | ||
| backend | ||
| backlog | ||
| datatypes | ||
| deployment/terraform | ||
| docs | ||
| domain | ||
| epr_data_exports | ||
| etl | ||
| infrastructure | ||
| model_data/requirements | ||
| orchestration | ||
| recommendations | ||
| repositories | ||
| sap worksheets | ||
| scripts | ||
| sfr/principal_pitch | ||
| survey_report | ||
| tests | ||
| utilities | ||
| utils | ||
| .coveragerc | ||
| .dockerignore | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| ara_backend_design.md | ||
| BaseUtility.py | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| conftest.py | ||
| CONTEXT.md | ||
| devcontainer.sh | ||
| Dockerfile.test | ||
| Dockerfile.test.dockerignore | ||
| Makefile | ||
| MEMORY.md | ||
| package-lock.json | ||
| package.json | ||
| pyproject.toml | ||
| pyrightconfig.json | ||
| pytest.ini | ||
| README.md | ||
| run_lambda_local.sh | ||
| serverless.yml | ||
| test.requirements.txt | ||
| tox.ini | ||
| UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md | ||
Model Repository
This repository contains the code pertaining to the development of the data science and machine learning products being utilised by Hestia.
The different folders in this repository relate to services that can be used independently, or can be imported and used as part of a larger application
Getting Started
Prerequisites
Dev Container Setup
This repo uses a Docker Compose-based dev container. The model-backend service joins a shared-dev Docker network so it can communicate with other local services (e.g. a frontend container) running on your machine.
VS Code users: The initializeCommand in devcontainer.json creates the shared-dev network automatically before the container starts. No manual step required — just open the repo and select Reopen in Container.
Non-VS Code / CI workflows: Run the following once before starting the container:
make dev-setup
This is idempotent and safe to re-run if the network already exists.
Folders
backend/
This folder contains the code for the fastapi backend service, which provides an interface to much of the functionality in this repository, for the frontend
model_data/
This folder contains related to the reading and preparation of assessment model data, including pulling out epc attributes
Testing
All tests can be run, against the configuration in pytest.ini running
pytest
This will run the complete panel of tests and report on coverage in the locations specified by the pytest.ini file.
To run tests in a specific service, e.g. inside of model_data, simply run
pytest --cov-config=model_data/.coveragerc --cov=model_data
This will produce the test results and coverage reports